| Literature DB >> 27807590 |
Rebecca T Levinson1, Todd Hulgan2, Spyros A Kalams2, Joshua P Fessel3, David C Samuels4.
Abstract
Background. Herpes zoster, or shingles, is a common, painful reactivation of latent varicella zoster virus infection. Understanding host factors that predispose to herpes zoster may permit development of more effective prevention strategies. Our objective was to examine mitochondrial haplogroups as a potential host factor related to herpes zoster incidence. Methods. Study participants were drawn from BioVU, a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) biobank connected to deidentified electronic medical records (EMRs) from Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Our study used 9691 Caucasian individuals with herpes zoster status determined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 053-053.9. Cases and controls were matched on sex and date of birth within 5 years. Mitochondrial haplogroups were defined from mitochondrial DNA variants genotyped on the Illumina 660W or Illumina Infinium Human-Exome Beadchip. Sex and date of birth were extracted from the EMR. Results. European mitochondrial haplogroup H had a protective association with herpes zoster status (odds ratio [OR] = .82; 95% confidence interval [CI], .71-.94; P = .005), whereas haplogroup clade IWX was a risk factor for herpes zoster status (OR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.07-1.77; P = .01). Conclusions. Mitochondrial haplogroup influences herpes zoster risk. Knowledge of a patient's mitochondrial haplogroup could allow for a precision approach to the management of herpes zoster risk through vaccination strategies and management of other modifiable risk factors.Entities:
Keywords: herpes zoster; immunosenescence; mitochondrial haplogroup; shingles
Year: 2016 PMID: 27807590 PMCID: PMC5088697 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofw184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis ISSN: 2328-8957 Impact factor: 3.835
Summary of Demographics in Whole Unmatched Dataset and by Mitochondrial Haplogroup
| Characteristic | All | H | IWX | J | T | Uk | Other |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Unmatched Data | ||||||||
| Number of Individuals | 20 551 | 9798 | 1322 | 2123 | 2246 | 4577 | 485 | |
| Sex (%Male) | 9278 (45.1) | 4365 (44.5) | 575 (43.5) | 974 (45.9) | 1043 (46.4) | 2117 (46.3) | 204 (42.1) | .11 |
| Zoster (%Cases) | 881 (4.3) | 379 (3.9)* | 76 (5.7)* | 101 (4.8) | 98 (4.4) | 208 (4.5) | 19 (3.9) | .02 |
| Cases vaccinated (%) | 107 (0.5) | 49 (0.5) | 8 (0.6) | 7 (0.3) | 13 (0.6) | 27 (0.6) | 3 (0.6) | .79 |
| Median age first zoster (IQR) | 67 (57, 77) | 68 (56, 76) | 65 (57, 75) | 68 (59, 77) | 67 (57, 78) | 67 (56, 77) | 70 (52, 82) | .80 |
| Median age last record (IQR) | 63 (52, 76) | 63 (52, 76) | 64 (51, 76) | 63 (52, 75) | 63 (52, 76) | 64 (52, 76) | 62 (50, 75) | .59 |
Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
a The significance across all haplogroups by χ2 test, Fisher test, or Kruskal–Wallis test.
*P < .01. Significance of each haplogroup vs all others column.
Figure 1.Criteria for defining and matching herpes zoster cases and controls. The flowchart describes the pipeline from initial genotyped sets through matching and splitting into analysis sets. Exclusionary criteria, and case and control definition along with the relative numbers that passed through each filtering step, are presented. A total of 881 cases were matched and randomly split into 2 sets of 417 and 464 cases. Abbreviations: CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
Summary of Demographics for All Individuals and by Mitochondrial Haplogroup in the Matched Dataset Before Randomization
| Characteristic | All | H | IWX | J | T | Uk | Other |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Matched Dataset (Set 1 + Set 2) | ||||||||
| Number of Individuals | 9691 | 4602 | 641 | 1015 | 1061 | 2153 | 219 | |
| Sex (%Male) | 3608 (37.2) | 1665 (36.2)** | 231 (36.0) | 405 (39.9) | 414 (39.0) | 825 (38.3) | 68 (31.1) | .04 |
| Zoster (%Cases) | 881 (9.1) | 379 (8.2)* | 76 (11.9)** | 101 (10.0) | 98 (9.2) | 208 (9.7) | 190 (8.7) | .04 |
| Cases vaccinated (%) | 107 (1.1) | 49 (1.1) | 8 (1.2) | 7 (0.7) | 13 (1.2) | 27 (1.3) | 3 (1.4) | .71 |
| Median age first zoster (IQR) | 67 (57, 77) | 68 (56, 76) | 65 (57, 75) | 68 (59, 77) | 67 (57, 78) | 67 (56, 77) | 70 (52, 82) | .80 |
Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
a The significance across all haplogroups by χ2 test, Fisher test, or Kruskal–Wallis test.
*P < .01. Significance of each haplogroup vs all others column.
**P < .05. Significance of each haplogroup vs all others column.
Summary of Demographics in the Randomly Defined Discovery and Replication Datasets
| Characteristic | All | H | IWX | J | T | Uk | Other |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery Set (Set 1) | ||||||||
| Number of Individuals | 4587 | 2199 | 296 | 481 | 505 | 991 | 115 | |
| Sex (%Male) | 1628 (35.5)b | 745 (33.9)** | 106 (35.8) | 172 (35.8) | 198 (39.2) | 372 (37.5) | 35 (30.4) | .12 |
| Zoster (%Cases) | 417 (9.1) | 180 (8.2)** | 40 (13.5)* | 47 (9.8) | 51 (10.1) | 85 (8.6) | 14 (12.2) | .04 |
| Cases vaccinated (%) | 47 (1.0) | 18 (0.8) | 4 (1.4) | 4 (0.8) | 7 (1.4) | 12 (1.2) | 2 (1.7) | .53 |
| Median age first zoster (IQR) | 68 (56,77) | 67 (54,76) | 67 (59, 77) | 67 (59, 78) | 71 (58, 82) | 69 (56, 77) | 70 (58, 81) | .60 |
| Replication Set (Set 2) | ||||||||
| Number of Individuals | 5104 | 2403 | 345 | 534 | 556 | 1162 | 104 | |
| Sex (%Male) | 1980 (38.8)b | 920 (38.3) | 125 (36.2) | 233 (43.6)** | 216 (38.8) | 453 (40.0) | 33 (31.7) | .12 |
| Zoster (%Cases) | 464 (9.1) | 199 (8.3) | 36 (10.4) | 54 (10.1) | 47 (8.5) | 123 (10.6) | 5 (4.8) | .11 |
| Cases vaccinated (%) | 60 (1.2) | 31 (1.3) | 4 (1.2) | 3 (0.6) | 6 (1.1) | 15 (1.3) | 1 (0.96) | .82 |
| Median age first zoster (IQR) | 67 (57, 76) | 68 (58, 77) | 61 (57, 74) | 68 (59, 77) | 65 (55, 74) | 66 (56, 76) | 70 (35, 80) | .69 |
Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
a The significance across all haplogroups by χ2 test, Fisher test, or Kruskal–Wallis test.
b Discovery set is statistically different than replication set in all individuals.
*P < .01. Significance of each haplogroup vs all others column.
**P < .05. Significance of each haplogroup vs all others column.
Figure 2.Association of haplogroups H and IWX with herpes zoster by Mantel-Haentsel tests. Forest plots for (A) haplogroup H and (B) clade IWX with case and control numbers, odds ratio (OR), and P value. The merged group has greater power for group H, whereas for IWX a significant association was only seen in Dataset 1. (C) Stratification by sex. In H the protective effect is stronger in males, and the risk effect of IWX is stronger in females.
Figure 3.Kaplan-Meier curves showing unadjusted probability of not having a herpes zoster International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code over time. Data analyzed were age at first herpes zoster ICD-9 for the cases and age at last medical record for the controls. Incidence of a herpes zoster ICD-9 code was considered an event. We compared (A) haplogroup H subjects to all subjects not in haplogroup H and (B) IWX haplogroup clade subjects vs all others. Censored values from the end of the medical record are denoted by vertical lines.