Literature DB >> 12755206

Postoperative integrity of veterinary surgical gloves.

Ben J Character1, Ron M McLaughlin, Cheryl S Hedlund, Carolyn R Boyle, Steven H Elder.   

Abstract

A multicenter, prospective study was performed to document the incidence of defective gloves postoperatively in veterinary surgery and to correlate defects with a variety of influencing factors. Gloves were collected after surgical procedures performed by the small animal clinical services at two veterinary teaching hospitals and one institution's student surgery laboratories. Gloves were evaluated for defects using electrical resistance testing. The overall incidence of glove defects was 23.3%. Significantly more defects occurred in gloves used for nonsoft-tissue procedures and in gloves worn on the nondominant hand. Eighty-four percent of all defects occurred in procedures lasting >60 minutes. No differences were detected in the brands of gloves used nor among surgeons of different experience levels. The individuals performing the surgery were not able to accurately predict the presence of a defect in their gloves. Surgeons should remain alert for possible glove defects and consider measures such as changing gloves every 60 minutes or double-gloving to minimize potential complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12755206     DOI: 10.5326/0390311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc        ISSN: 0587-2871            Impact factor:   1.023


  4 in total

1.  Glove perforation rate with orthopedic gloving versus double gloving technique in tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Kimberly Egeler; Nicole Stephenson; Natasha Stanke
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Colored Indicator Undergloves Increase the Detection of Glove Perforations by Surgeons During Small Animal Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lee B Meakin; Oliver P Gilman; Kevin J Parsons; Neil J Burton; Sorrel J Langley-Hobbs
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 1.495

3.  Surgical hand preparation in an equine hospital: Comparison of general practice with a standardised protocol and characterisation of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus recovered.

Authors:  Tina Rocktäschel; Katharina Renner-Martin; Christiane Cuny; Walter Brehm; Uwe Truyen; Stephanie Speck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Observational study of patient and surgeon preoperative preparation in ten companion animal clinics in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Maureen E C Anderson; Brittany A Foster; J Scott Weese
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.741

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.