Literature DB >> 19021782

Factors affecting unintentional harvesting selectivity in a monomorphic species.

Nils Bunnefeld1, David Baines, David Newborn, E J Milner-Gulland.   

Abstract

1. Changes in the abundance of populations have always perplexed ecologists but long-term studies are revealing new insights into population dynamic processes. Long-term data are often derived from harvest records although many wild populations face high harvesting pressures leading to overharvesting and extinction. Additionally, harvest records used to describe population processes such as fluctuations in abundance and reproductive success often assume a random off-take. 2. Selective harvesting based on phenotypic characteristics occurs in many species (e.g. trophy hunting, fisheries) and has important implications for population dynamics, conservation and management. 3. In species with no marked morphological differences between the age and sex classes, such as the red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus during the shooting season, hunters cannot consciously select for a specific sex or age class during the shooting process but harvest records could still give a biased reflection of the population structure because of differences in behaviour between age and sex classes. 4. This study compared age and sex ratios in the bag with those in the population before shooting for red grouse at different points in the shooting season and different densities, which has rarely been tested before. 5. More young than old grouse were shot at large bag sizes and vice versa for small bag sizes than would be expected from the population composition before shooting. The susceptibility of old males to shooting compared to females increased with bag size and was high at the first time the area was shot but decreased with the number of times an area was harvested. 6. These findings stress that the assumption made in many studies that harvest records reflect the age and sex ratio of the population and therefore reflect productivity can be misleading. 7. In this paper, as in the literature, it is also shown that number of grouse shot reflects grouse density and therefore that hunting selectivity might influence population dynamics in a cyclic species. 8. The study is not only relevant for red grouse but applies to systems showing interactions between selective harvesting and wider ecological processes, such as age- and sex-related parasitism and territoriality, which may drive population fluctuations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19021782     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01500.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  13 in total

1.  Data from selective harvests underestimate temporal trends in quantitative traits.

Authors:  Fanie Pelletier; Marco Festa-Bianchet; Jon T Jorgenson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Brain size and the risk of getting shot.

Authors:  Anders Pape Møller; Johannes Erritzøe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Express your personality or go along with the group: what determines the behaviour of shoaling perch?

Authors:  Carin Magnhagen; Nils Bunnefeld
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Citizen science based monitoring of Greylag goose (Anser anser) in Bavaria (Germany): combining count data and bag data to estimate long-term trends between 1988/89 and 2010/11.

Authors:  Andreas Grauer; Andreas König; Nils Bunnefeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Interaction effects between weather and space use on harvesting effort and patterns in red deer.

Authors:  Inger M Rivrud; Erling L Meisingset; Leif E Loe; Atle Mysterud
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The relative importance of direct and indirect effects of hunting mortality on the population dynamics of brown bears.

Authors:  Jacinthe Gosselin; Andreas Zedrosser; Jon E Swenson; Fanie Pelletier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Who bites the bullet first? The susceptibility of leopards Panthera pardus to trophy hunting.

Authors:  Alex Richard Braczkowski; Guy Andrew Balme; Amy Dickman; David Whyte Macdonald; Julien Fattebert; Tristan Dickerson; Paul Johnson; Luke Hunter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Can hunting data be used to estimate unbiased population parameters? A case study on brown bears.

Authors:  Martin Leclerc; Joanie Van de Walle; Andreas Zedrosser; Jon E Swenson; Fanie Pelletier
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments.

Authors:  Tom C Cameron; Daniel O'Sullivan; Alan Reynolds; Joseph P Hicks; Stuart B Piertney; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Multiple behavioural, morphological and cognitive developmental changes arise from a single alteration to early life spatial environment, resulting in fitness consequences for released pheasants.

Authors:  Mark A Whiteside; Rufus Sage; Joah R Madden
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.