Ann Y Lee1,2, Nicolas Droppelmann1,3, Katherine S Panageas4, Qin Zhou4, Charlotte E Ariyan1, Mary S Brady1, Paul B Chapman5, Daniel G Coit6. 1. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 2. New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 3. Catholic University of Chile School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. coitd@mskcc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pathologic stage II melanoma patients have variable outcomes when divided by substage. We hypothesized that an understanding of the patterns of initial relapse by substage will better inform follow-up guidelines. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 738 adult patients with pathologic stage II cutaneous melanoma treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1993 and 2013. Clinical records were reviewed to determine time, location, and method of detection of initial relapse. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 52 months, 219 patients relapsed. Relapses were detected more frequently in higher substages. Initial relapses were most commonly local/in-transit for IIA and IIB and systemic for IIC. Lung and brain were the most frequent sites of systemic relapse. Patient-detection was the most common method of relapse detection (59%) in all substages. The 5-year cumulative incidence for patient-detected relapse was 13.6% for IIA, 18.9% for IIB, and 23.3% for IIC and for image-detected relapse was 3.4, 7.9, and 16.6%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence for physician-detected relapse was less than 10% across all substages and leveled off at 3 years for stage IIA and IIB and 2 years for stage IIC. CONCLUSIONS: Relapses were most frequently patient-detected in all stage II substages, highlighting the importance of patient education and self-examination. The highest yield for routine imaging is in stage IIC patients during the first 4 years. Physician examination is unlikely to detect relapses beyond 3 years for stage IIA and IIB and beyond 2 years for stage IIC patients.
PURPOSE: Pathologic stage II melanomapatients have variable outcomes when divided by substage. We hypothesized that an understanding of the patterns of initial relapse by substage will better inform follow-up guidelines. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 738 adult patients with pathologic stage II cutaneous melanoma treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1993 and 2013. Clinical records were reviewed to determine time, location, and method of detection of initial relapse. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 52 months, 219 patients relapsed. Relapses were detected more frequently in higher substages. Initial relapses were most commonly local/in-transit for IIA and IIB and systemic for IIC. Lung and brain were the most frequent sites of systemic relapse. Patient-detection was the most common method of relapse detection (59%) in all substages. The 5-year cumulative incidence for patient-detected relapse was 13.6% for IIA, 18.9% for IIB, and 23.3% for IIC and for image-detected relapse was 3.4, 7.9, and 16.6%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence for physician-detected relapse was less than 10% across all substages and leveled off at 3 years for stage IIA and IIB and 2 years for stage IIC. CONCLUSIONS: Relapses were most frequently patient-detected in all stage II substages, highlighting the importance of patient education and self-examination. The highest yield for routine imaging is in stage IIC patients during the first 4 years. Physician examination is unlikely to detect relapses beyond 3 years for stage IIA and IIB and beyond 2 years for stage IIC patients.
Authors: Michael A Postow; Jason Chesney; Anna C Pavlick; Caroline Robert; Kenneth Grossmann; David McDermott; Gerald P Linette; Nicolas Meyer; Jeffrey K Giguere; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Montaser Shaheen; Marc S Ernstoff; David Minor; April K Salama; Matthew Taylor; Patrick A Ott; Linda M Rollin; Christine Horak; Paul Gagnier; Jedd D Wolchok; F Stephen Hodi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C M Balch; S J Soong; J E Gershenwald; J F Thompson; D S Reintgen; N Cascinelli; M Urist; K M McMasters; M I Ross; J M Kirkwood; M B Atkins; J A Thompson; D G Coit; D Byrd; R Desmond; Y Zhang; P Y Liu; G H Lyman; A Morabito Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anne Brecht Francken; Helen M Shaw; Neil A Accortt; Seng-Jaw Soong; Harald J Hoekstra; John F Thompson Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-03-15 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jeffrey A Sosman; Kevin B Kim; Lynn Schuchter; Rene Gonzalez; Anna C Pavlick; Jeffrey S Weber; Grant A McArthur; Thomas E Hutson; Stergios J Moschos; Keith T Flaherty; Peter Hersey; Richard Kefford; Donald Lawrence; Igor Puzanov; Karl D Lewis; Ravi K Amaravadi; Bartosz Chmielowski; H Jeffrey Lawrence; Yu Shyr; Fei Ye; Jiang Li; Keith B Nolop; Richard J Lee; Andrew K Joe; Antoni Ribas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eleni Linos; Susan M Swetter; Myles G Cockburn; Graham A Colditz; Christina A Clarke Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2009-01-08 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Samantha Damude; Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers; Anne Brecht Francken; Sylvia Ter Meulen; Esther Bastiaannet; Harald J Hoekstra Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Alexander M M Eggermont; Domenico Bellomo; Suzette M Arias-Mejias; Enrica Quattrocchi; Sindhuja Sominidi-Damodaran; Alina G Bridges; Julia S Lehman; Tina J Hieken; James W Jakub; Dennis H Murphree; Mark R Pittelkow; Jason C Sluzevich; Mark A Cappel; Sanjay P Bagaria; Charles Perniciaro; Félicia J Tjien-Fooh; Barbara Rentroia-Pacheco; Renske Wever; Martin H van Vliet; Jvalini Dwarkasing; Alexander Meves Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2020-10-05 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Edmund K Bartlett; Michael A Marchetti; Douglas Grossman; Susan M Swetter; Sancy A Leachman; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Stephen W Dusza; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; John M Kirkwood; Amy L Tin; Andrew J Vickers Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Mark William Linder; Michael E Egger; Tracy Van Meter; Shesh N Rai; Roland Valdes; Melissa Barousse Hall; Xiaoyong Wu; Norah Alghamdi; Jason A Chesney Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.074