Literature DB >> 27803999

Use of an extended INR follow-up interval for Veteran patients in an anticoagulation clinic.

Andrea L Porter1,2, Amanda R Margolis3,4, Rebecca R Schoen4,5, Carla E Staresinic4, Cheryl A Ray4, Christopher D Fletcher4,6.   

Abstract

A prospective, single-arm study of 50 participants evaluated an extended INR follow-up interval to determine the implementation feasibility and safety of an extended interval in Veterans on a stable dose of warfarin. A protocol was designed to allow for a rigorous, yet pragmatic evaluation of a 12-week INR follow-up interval. Feasibility was determined by study enrollment, retention, and participant achievement rates for the extended INR interval. Safety was determined by bleeding and thromboembolism rates. Participants were monitored for 6 months. Despite the long-term stability of participants prior to enrollment, only 56% achieved a 12-week follow-up interval and only 34% of enrolled participants maintained a 12-week interval. Sixteen percent of participants were never eligible for an extension of their INR follow-up interval despite meeting initial enrollment criteria. There were two major bleeding events and one participant who experienced a thromboembolic event. Implementation of an extended interval of INR follow-up appears feasible as participant enrollment goals were met and pharmacists were able to follow the study protocol. However, a lower than expected proportion of participants were able to achieve and maintain an extended INR follow-up interval. Future evaluations are needed to confirm the safety of an extended INR interval.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation; International normalized ratio (INR); Interval; Management; Monitoring; Warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27803999     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-016-1448-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  15 in total

1.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Outcomes and predictors of very stable INR control during chronic anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Thomas Delate; Nathan P Clark; Chad Martell; Thu Tran; Mark A Crowther; David A Garcia; Walter Ageno; Elaine M Hylek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey.

Authors:  Ron Pisters; Deirdre A Lane; Robby Nieuwlaat; Cees B de Vos; Harry J G M Crijns; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Clinical Decision Support Systems and Prevention: A Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gibril J Njie; Krista K Proia; Anilkrishna B Thota; Ramona K C Finnie; David P Hopkins; Starr M Banks; David B Callahan; Nicolaas P Pronk; Kimberly J Rask; Daniel T Lackland; Thomas E Kottke
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Feasibility of Extended-interval Follow-up for Patients Receiving Warfarin.

Authors:  Nicholas W Carris; Alisa Spinelli; Danielle Pierini; James R Taylor; Katherine Vogel Anderson; Karen Sando; Jason Powell; Eric I Rosenberg; Marc S Zumberg; Steven M Smith; John G Gums; Eric Dietrich
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.023

6.  Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  B F Gage; A D Waterman; W Shannon; M Boechler; M W Rich; M J Radford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

8.  Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.

Authors:  Enola Proctor; Hiie Silmere; Ramesh Raghavan; Peter Hovmand; Greg Aarons; Alicia Bunger; Richard Griffey; Melissa Hensley
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2011-03

9.  A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.

Authors:  Byron J Powell; Thomas J Waltz; Matthew J Chinman; Laura J Damschroder; Jeffrey L Smith; Monica M Matthieu; Enola K Proctor; JoAnn E Kirchner
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  The science of human factors: separating fact from fiction.

Authors:  Alissa L Russ; Rollin J Fairbanks; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Laura G Militello; Jason J Saleem; Robert L Wears
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of an extended International Normalized Ratio follow-up interval on healthcare use among veteran patients on stable warfarin doses.

Authors:  Amanda R Margolis; Andrea L Porter; Carla E Staresinic; Cheryl A Ray
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  Patient Satisfaction With Extended International Normalized Ratio Follow-up Intervals in a Veteran Population.

Authors:  Rebecca R Schoen; Michael W Nagy; Andrea L Porter; Amanda R Margolis
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Feasibility and safety of a 12-week INR follow-up protocol over 2 years in an anticoagulation clinic: a single-arm prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andrea L Porter; Amanda R Margolis; Carla E Staresinic; Michael W Nagy; Rebecca R Schoen; Cheryl A Ray; Christopher D Fletcher
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.300

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.