Literature DB >> 30368762

Feasibility and safety of a 12-week INR follow-up protocol over 2 years in an anticoagulation clinic: a single-arm prospective cohort study.

Andrea L Porter1,2, Amanda R Margolis3,4, Carla E Staresinic4, Michael W Nagy4,5, Rebecca R Schoen6, Cheryl A Ray4, Christopher D Fletcher4,7.   

Abstract

The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians' guidelines recommended a 12-week INR follow-up interval may be appropriate for patients on stable warfarin doses. Limited evidence supports this recommendation. A single-arm, prospective cohort study over 24 months was completed in a Veterans Affairs anticoagulation clinic to determine the long-term feasibility and safety of implementing an extended INR follow-up interval in Veterans on stable doses of warfarin. Participants were required to have a stable warfarin dose for 6 months prior to enrollment. A prespecified protocol was used to titrate, extend, and manage the INR interval up to 12 weeks. Scheduling of extended INR intervals was a primary outcome. Safety outcomes included major and serious bleeding and thromboembolic events. A post-hoc comparison of baseline characteristics between individuals who were scheduled for at least 4 consecutive 12-week INR follow-up intervals and those who were not was completed. Of the 50 participants, 36 (72%) were scheduled for at least one 12-week interval and 15 (30%) were scheduled for 4 consecutive intervals. There were 2 thromboembolic events that occurred in 1 participant. There were 28 major and serious bleeding events in 19 participants; 8 occurred while on the extended INR interval. In the post-hoc analysis, no participants scheduled for 4 consecutive 12-week intervals had heart failure. Based on 2 years of monitoring, a 12-week INR follow-up interval using a detailed protocol with titration of INR interval extension appears feasible for a subset of patients. Patients with heart failure may not be suitable for this intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation; Drug monitoring; International normalized ratio; Time factors; Warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30368762      PMCID: PMC6398436          DOI: 10.1007/s11239-018-1760-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  22 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Sam Schulman; Daniel M Witt; Per Olav Vandvik; Jason Fish; Michael J Kovacs; Peter J Svensson; David L Veenstra; Mark Crowther; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Outcomes and predictors of very stable INR control during chronic anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Thomas Delate; Nathan P Clark; Chad Martell; Thu Tran; Mark A Crowther; David A Garcia; Walter Ageno; Elaine M Hylek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Stability of International Normalized Ratios in Patients Taking Long-term Warfarin Therapy.

Authors:  Sean D Pokorney; DaJuanicia N Simon; Laine Thomas; Bernard J Gersh; Elaine M Hylek; Jonathan P Piccini; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Feasibility of Extended-interval Follow-up for Patients Receiving Warfarin.

Authors:  Nicholas W Carris; Alisa Spinelli; Danielle Pierini; James R Taylor; Katherine Vogel Anderson; Karen Sando; Jason Powell; Eric I Rosenberg; Marc S Zumberg; Steven M Smith; John G Gums; Eric Dietrich
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.023

6.  Twelve-month outcomes and predictors of very stable INR control in prevalent warfarin users.

Authors:  D M Witt; T Delate; N P Clark; C Martell; T Tran; M A Crowther; D A Garcia; W Ageno; E M Hylek
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  Warfarin dose assessment every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks in patients with stable international normalized ratios: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sam Schulman; Sameer Parpia; Clare Stewart; Lisa Rudd-Scott; Jim A Julian; Mark Levine
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Predictors of unstable anticoagulation in African Americans.

Authors:  Larisa H Cavallari; Jonathan L Aston; Kathryn M Momary; Nancy L Shapiro; Shitalben R Patel; Edith A Nutescu
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Frequency of monitoring, non-adherence, and other topics dear to an anticoagulation clinic provider.

Authors:  Nathan P Clark
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  A comparison between six- and four-week intervals in surveillance of oral anticoagulant treatment.

Authors:  Vittorio Pengo; Fabio Barbero; Alessandra Biasiolo; Cinzia Pegoraro; Umberto Cucchini; Sabino Iliceto
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.493

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of an extended International Normalized Ratio follow-up interval on healthcare use among veteran patients on stable warfarin doses.

Authors:  Amanda R Margolis; Andrea L Porter; Carla E Staresinic; Cheryl A Ray
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  Patient Satisfaction With Extended International Normalized Ratio Follow-up Intervals in a Veteran Population.

Authors:  Rebecca R Schoen; Michael W Nagy; Andrea L Porter; Amanda R Margolis
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 3.  Questions and Answers on Practical Thrombotic Issues in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Guidance Document from the Italian Working Group on Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.

Authors:  Giuseppe Patti; Veronica Lio; Ilaria Cavallari; Felice Gragnano; Letizia Riva; Paolo Calabrò; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Vittorio Pengo; Andrea Rubboli
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.571

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.