Giordano D'Urso1, Andre R Brunoni2,3, Maria Pia Mazzaferro4, Annalisa Anastasia4, Andrea de Bartolomeis5, Antonio Mantovani6,7. 1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Anesthesiology and Pharmacoutilization, University Hospital of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. 2. Interdisciplinary Center for Applied Neuromodulation (CINA), University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Laboratory of Neurosciences (LIM-27), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Residency Program in Psychiatry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. 5. Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. 6. Department of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Sophie Davis School of Biomedical Education, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA. 7. Division of Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) hyperactivity has been detected in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. However, it is not understood whether this is a putative primary cause or a compensatory mechanism in OCD pathophysiology. Considering the polarity-dependent effects on cortical excitability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we applied cathodal and/or anodal tDCS to the pre-SMA of OCD patients to test which current polarity might better improve symptoms. METHODS:Twelve OCD patients received initially 10 anodal (n = 6) or cathodal (n = 6) daily consecutive 2 mA/20 min tDCS sessions with the active electrode placed bilaterally on the pre-SMA. In case of improvement or no change in symptoms severity, the subjects were maintained on the same current polarity for 10 more sessions. In case of symptoms worsening after the first 10 sessions they were switched to the other polarity for 10 more sessions to test the hypothesis of a polarity-dependent effect. Therefore, each subject received 20 tDCS sessions. The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) were administered biweekly to assess changes in symptoms severity. RESULTS: After 10 sessions, 50% of patients who initially received anodal stimulation were switched to cathodal, while 100% of patients initially assigned to cathodal stimulation continued on the same polarity. At the end of the study, a statistically significant decrease was observed in the mean Y-BOCS scores of those patients who underwent cathodal tDCS. No pre-post difference was found in the scores of patients following anodal tDCS. CONCLUSIONS: Cathodal but not anodal tDCS over the pre-SMA significantly improved OCD symptoms.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) hyperactivity has been detected in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. However, it is not understood whether this is a putative primary cause or a compensatory mechanism in OCD pathophysiology. Considering the polarity-dependent effects on cortical excitability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we applied cathodal and/or anodal tDCS to the pre-SMA of OCDpatients to test which current polarity might better improve symptoms. METHODS: Twelve OCDpatients received initially 10 anodal (n = 6) or cathodal (n = 6) daily consecutive 2 mA/20 min tDCS sessions with the active electrode placed bilaterally on the pre-SMA. In case of improvement or no change in symptoms severity, the subjects were maintained on the same current polarity for 10 more sessions. In case of symptoms worsening after the first 10 sessions they were switched to the other polarity for 10 more sessions to test the hypothesis of a polarity-dependent effect. Therefore, each subject received 20 tDCS sessions. The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) were administered biweekly to assess changes in symptoms severity. RESULTS: After 10 sessions, 50% of patients who initially received anodal stimulation were switched to cathodal, while 100% of patients initially assigned to cathodal stimulation continued on the same polarity. At the end of the study, a statistically significant decrease was observed in the mean Y-BOCS scores of those patients who underwent cathodal tDCS. No pre-post difference was found in the scores of patients following anodal tDCS. CONCLUSIONS: Cathodal but not anodal tDCS over the pre-SMA significantly improved OCD symptoms.
Authors: L Labruna; A Stark-Inbar; A Breska; M Dabit; B Vanderschelden; M A Nitsche; R B Ivry Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Emanuela Zappulo; Maria Pia Riccio; Sandro Binda; Laura Pellegrinelli; Fabrizio Pregliasco; Antonio Riccardo Buonomo; Biagio Pinchera; Giordano D'Urso; Carmela Bravaccio; Guglielmo Borgia; Ivan Gentile Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Thomas G Adams; Josh M Cisler; Benjamin Kelmendi; Jamilah R George; Stephen A Kichuk; Christopher L Averill; Alan Anticevic; Chadi G Abdallah; Christopher Pittenger Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Hyein Cho; Lais B Razza; Lucas Borrione; Marom Bikson; Leigh Charvet; Tracy A Dennis-Tiwary; Andre R Brunoni; Pedro Sudbrack-Oliveira Journal: Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) Date: 2022-01-25
Authors: Renata de Melo Felipe da Silva; Andre R Brunoni; Stephan Goerigk; Marcelo Camargo Batistuzzo; Daniel Lucas da Conceição Costa; Juliana Belo Diniz; Frank Padberg; Giordano D'Urso; Eurípedes Constantino Miguel; Roseli Gedanke Shavitt Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Elizabeth Shephard; Emily R Stern; Odile A van den Heuvel; Daniel L C Costa; Marcelo C Batistuzzo; Priscilla B G Godoy; Antonio C Lopes; Andre R Brunoni; Marcelo Q Hoexter; Roseli G Shavitt; Y C Janardhan Reddy; Christine Lochner; Dan J Stein; H Blair Simpson; Euripedes C Miguel Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 15.992