Thomas G Adams1,2,3, Josh M Cisler4,5, Benjamin Kelmendi2,3, Jamilah R George2,6, Stephen A Kichuk2, Christopher L Averill2,3,7,8, Alan Anticevic2, Chadi G Abdallah2,3,7,8, Christopher Pittenger2,9. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 3. Clinical Neuroscience Division of the National Center for PTSD, West Haven VA Medical Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA. 6. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, Connecticut, USA. 7. Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 8. Menninger Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 9. Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposed-based psychotherapy is a mainstay of treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and anxious psychopathology. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the default mode network (DMN), which is anchored by the mPFC, promote safety learning. Neuromodulation targeting the mPFC might augment therapeutic safety learning and enhance response to exposure-based therapies. METHODS: To characterize the effects of mPFC neuromodulation on functional connectivity, 17 community volunteers completed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans before and after 20 min of frontopolar anodal multifocal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). To examine the effects of tDCS on therapeutic safety learning, 24 patients with OCD completed a pilot randomized clinical trial; they were randomly assigned (double-blind, 50:50) to receive active or sham frontopolar tDCS before completing an in vivo exposure and response prevention (ERP) challenge. Changes in subjective emotional distress during the ERP challenge were used to index therapeutic safety learning. RESULTS: In community volunteers, frontal pole functional connectivity with the middle and superior frontal gyri increased, while connectivity with the anterior insula and basal ganglia decreased (ps < .001, corrected) after tDCS; functional connectivity between DMN and salience network also decreased after tDCS (ps < .001, corrected). OCD patients who received active tDCS exhibited more rapid therapeutic safety learning (ps < .05) during the ERP challenge than patients who received sham tDCS. CONCLUSIONS: Frontopolar tDCS may modulate mPFC and DMN functional connectivity and can accelerate therapeutic safety learning. Though limited by small samples, these findings motivate further exploration of the effects of frontopolar tDCS on neural and behavioral targets associated with exposure-based psychotherapies.
BACKGROUND: Exposed-based psychotherapy is a mainstay of treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and anxious psychopathology. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the default mode network (DMN), which is anchored by the mPFC, promote safety learning. Neuromodulation targeting the mPFC might augment therapeutic safety learning and enhance response to exposure-based therapies. METHODS: To characterize the effects of mPFC neuromodulation on functional connectivity, 17 community volunteers completed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans before and after 20 min of frontopolar anodal multifocal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). To examine the effects of tDCS on therapeutic safety learning, 24 patients with OCD completed a pilot randomized clinical trial; they were randomly assigned (double-blind, 50:50) to receive active or sham frontopolar tDCS before completing an in vivo exposure and response prevention (ERP) challenge. Changes in subjective emotional distress during the ERP challenge were used to index therapeutic safety learning. RESULTS: In community volunteers, frontal pole functional connectivity with the middle and superior frontal gyri increased, while connectivity with the anterior insula and basal ganglia decreased (ps < .001, corrected) after tDCS; functional connectivity between DMN and salience network also decreased after tDCS (ps < .001, corrected). OCD patients who received active tDCS exhibited more rapid therapeutic safety learning (ps < .05) during the ERP challenge than patients who received sham tDCS. CONCLUSIONS: Frontopolar tDCS may modulate mPFC and DMN functional connectivity and can accelerate therapeutic safety learning. Though limited by small samples, these findings motivate further exploration of the effects of frontopolar tDCS on neural and behavioral targets associated with exposure-based psychotherapies.
Authors: Josh M Cisler; Amanda Elton; Ashley P Kennedy; Jonathan Young; Sonet Smitherman; George Andrew James; Clinton D Kilts Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Jamie D Feusner; Teena Moody; Tsz Man Lai; Courtney Sheen; Sahib Khalsa; Jesse Brown; Jennifer Levitt; Jeffry Alger; Joseph O'Neill Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Mascha Van't Wout; Sharon M Longo; Madhavi K Reddy; Noah S Philip; Marguerite T Bowker; Benjamin D Greenberg Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Ali Baioui; Juliane Pilgramm; Christian J Merz; Bertram Walter; Dieter Vaitl; Rudolf Stark Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Young Goo Kim; Song E Kim; Jihye Lee; Sungeun Hwang; Seung-Schik Yoo; Hyang Woon Lee Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Alexandra Kammen; Jonathon Cavaleri; Jordan Lam; Adam C Frank; Xenos Mason; Wooseong Choi; Marisa Penn; Kaevon Brasfield; Barbara Van Noppen; Stuart B Murray; Darrin Jason Lee Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-08-09 Impact factor: 4.086