Literature DB >> 27801693

Change in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions Using Gadoxetate Disodium Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.

Thomas A Hope1, Rizwan Aslam, Stefanie Weinstein, Benjamin M Yeh, Carlos U Corvera, Alex Monto, Judy Yee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves lesion characterization in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma compared with computed tomography (CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with indeterminate lesions found at contrast-enhanced CT were prospectively enrolled and imaged using gadoxetate-enhanced hepatobiliary phase (HBP) MRI within 30 days of their initial CT. Three readers graded each lesion at CT and MRI using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2014 major criteria and HBP characterization as an ancillary feature. Patients were followed for an average of 1.8 years to document growth or stability of each lesion.
RESULTS: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System categorization changed for 71% (52/73) of lesions based on HBP MRI compared with CT, with 30% (22/73) of lesions upgraded and 41% (30/73) of lesions downgraded. There was almost perfect agreement between readers for arterial phase hyperintensity and HBP hypointensity, with lower interreader agreement for washout and capsule appearance. On the basis of composite clinical follow-up, lesions that were subsequently classified as hepatocellular carcinoma were assigned a higher LI-RADS category on HBP MRI when compared with CT.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with indeterminate lesions seen on contrast-enhanced CT, HBP MRI using gadoxetate improves lesion characterization when using LI-RADS v2014 criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27801693      PMCID: PMC5411341          DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  20 in total

1.  Multidetector computed tomography triphasic evaluation of the liver before transplantation: importance of equilibrium phase washout and morphology for characterizing hypervascular lesions.

Authors:  Yueyi I Liu; Aya Kamaya; R Brooke Jeffrey; Lewis K Shin
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Differences in Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System Categorization Between MRI and CT.

Authors:  Michael T Corwin; Ghaneh Fananapazir; Michael Jin; Ramit Lamba; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Improvement of gadoxetate arterial phase capture with a high spatio-temporal resolution multiphase three-dimensional SPGR-Dixon sequence.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Manojkumar Saranathan; Iva Petkovska; Brian A Hargreaves; Robert J Herfkens; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Respiratory motion artifact affecting hepatic arterial phase imaging with gadoxetate disodium: examination recovery with a multiple arterial phase acquisition.

Authors:  Jason A Pietryga; Lauren M B Burke; Daniele Marin; Tracy A Jaffe; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Hepatobiliary agents and their role in LI-RADS.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Kathryn J Fowler; Claude B Sirlin; Eduardo A C Costa; Judy Yee; Benjamin M Yeh; Jay P Heiken
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-03

6.  Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Seo; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jong Doo Lee; Woo-Suk Chung; Yeo-Eun Kim
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography with histopathological examinations for the identification of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter phase III study.

Authors:  Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Keitaro Sofue; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Masahiro Okada; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma: intraindividual comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI at 3.0 and 1.5 T.

Authors:  Young Kon Kim; Chong Soo Kim; Young Min Han; Hee Chul Yu; Dongil Choi
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: role of unenhanced and delayed phase multi-detector row helical CT in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Riccardo Iannaccone; Andrea Laghi; Carlo Catalano; Plinio Rossi; Filippo Mangiapane; Takamichi Murakami; Masatoshi Hori; Francesca Piacentini; Italo Nofroni; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Effect of flip angle for optimization of image quality of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced biliary imaging at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Sooah Kim; Thais C Mussi; Lawrence J Lee; Elizabeth V Mausner; Kyunghee C Cho; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  4 in total

1.  Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS.

Authors:  Barbara Schellhaas; Matthias Hammon; Deike Strobel; Lukas Pfeifer; Christian Kielisch; Ruediger S Goertz; Alexander Cavallaro; Rolf Janka; Markus F Neurath; Michael Uder; Hannes Seuss
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Kathryn J Fowler; Aya Kamaya; Ania Z Kielar; Khaled M Elsayes; Mustafa R Bashir; Yuko Kono; Richard K Do; Donald G Mitchell; Amit G Singal; An Tang; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The capsule appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: Correlation with pathology and dynamic CT.

Authors:  Bohyun Kim; Jei Hee Lee; Jai Keun Kim; Hye Jin Kim; Young Bae Kim; Dakeun Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Consensus report from the 8th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Christoph J Zech; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Thomas Berg; Hersh Chandarana; Gar-Yang Chau; Luigi Grazioli; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Elmar M Merkle; Takamichi Murakami; Jens Ricke; Claude B Sirlin; Bin Song; Bachir Taouli; Kengo Yoshimitsu; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.