Literature DB >> 23371926

Improvement of gadoxetate arterial phase capture with a high spatio-temporal resolution multiphase three-dimensional SPGR-Dixon sequence.

Thomas A Hope1, Manojkumar Saranathan, Iva Petkovska, Brian A Hargreaves, Robert J Herfkens, Shreyas S Vasanawala.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether a multiphase method with high spatiotemporal resolution (STR) by means of a combination of parallel imaging, pseudorandom sampling and temporal view sharing improves the capture and intensity of gadoxetate arterial phase images as well as lesion enhancement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were imaged with a conventional spoiled gradient echo acquisition and 48 with a high STR multiphase acquisition after the administration of gadoxetate. Arterial phase capture, image quality, and quality of fat suppression were qualitatively graded. Fourteen lesions in the conventional group and 28 in the high STR multiphase group were imaged, including 34 focal nodular hyperplasias. The ratio of lesion to parenchyma enhancement as well as relative hepatic artery enhancement were calculated. Chi-squared, Mann-Whitney U and student t-tests were used to compare differences.
RESULTS: The high STR multiphase acquisition included the arterial phase more frequently than conventional acquisitions (P < 0.001), with the arterial phase missed in 17% (95% CI of 4-28%) of patients with conventional acquisition compared with 2% (95% CI of 0-6%) with the high STR multiphase acquisition. There was no loss of image quality or degree of fat saturation. Additionally, there was increased relative intensity of the hepatic arteries (P < 0.001) as well as lesion enhancement (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The high STR multiphase acquisition resulted in more reliable gadoxetate arterial phase capture compared with a conventional acquisition while preserving image quality with robust fat saturation.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FNH; arterial phase; gadoxetate; view sharing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23371926     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  10 in total

1.  Combined dynamic contrast-enhanced liver MRI and MRA using interleaved variable density sampling.

Authors:  Mahdi Salmani Rahimi; Frank R Korosec; Kang Wang; James H Holmes; Utaroh Motosugi; Peter Bannas; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  High temporal resolution dynamic MRI and arterial input function for assessment of GFR in pediatric subjects.

Authors:  Umit Yoruk; Manojkumar Saranathan; Andreas M Loening; Brian A Hargreaves; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Multiple arterial phase MRI of arterial hypervascular hepatic lesions: improved arterial phase capture and lesion enhancement.

Authors:  Nabia S Ikram; Judy Yee; Stefanie Weinstein; Benjamin M Yeh; Carlos U Corvera; Alexander Monto; Thomas A Hope
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-03

4.  Characterization of the arterial enhancement pattern of focal liver lesions by multiple arterial phase magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between hepatocellular carcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia.

Authors:  Marco Gatti; Marco Calandri; Laura Bergamasco; Fatemeh Darvizeh; Luigi Grazioli; Riccardo Inchingolo; Davide Ippolito; Stefano Rousset; Andrea Veltri; Paolo Fonio; Riccardo Faletti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  The diagnostic value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI for the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chong Hyun Suh; Kyung Won Kim; Gene Young Kim; Yong Moon Shin; Pyo Nyun Kim; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Change in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions Using Gadoxetate Disodium Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Rizwan Aslam; Stefanie Weinstein; Benjamin M Yeh; Carlos U Corvera; Alex Monto; Judy Yee
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Evaluation of Transient Motion During Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Multiphasic Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Free-Breathing Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Mi Hye Yu; Bo Yun Hur; Robert Grimm; Kai Tobias Block; Hersh Chandarana; Berthold Kiefer; Yohan Son
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Artifacts during the arterial phase of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: Multiple arterial phases using view-sharing from two different vendors versus single arterial phase imaging.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Young Kon Kim; Tae Wook Kang; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Won Jae Lee; Soohyun Ahn; Na Young Hwang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Triple Arterial Phase MR Imaging with Gadoxetic Acid Using a Combination of Contrast Enhanced Time Robust Angiography, Keyhole, and Viewsharing Techniques and Two-Dimensional Parallel Imaging in Comparison with Conventional Single Arterial Phase.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Mi Hye Yu; Eun Ju Kim; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 10.  Rapid Imaging: Recent Advances in Abdominal MRI for Reducing Acquisition Time and Its Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Marcel Dominik Nickel; Johannes M Peeters; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.