Literature DB >> 21467946

Detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma: intraindividual comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI at 3.0 and 1.5 T.

Young Kon Kim1, Chong Soo Kim, Young Min Han, Hee Chul Yu, Dongil Choi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T for the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and compare with that at 1.5 T. MATERIALS: Forty patients with 54 HCCs (size range: 0.6-2.0 cm) underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIs at both 1.5 and 3.0 T with 3 to 8 days interval. The MRIs were compared quantitatively by measuring tumor-liver contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitatively by evaluating tumor-liver contrast using matched pairs analysis. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity were also evaluated by the consensus readings of 2 reviewers using the alternative-free response receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method.
RESULTS: Although the tumor-liver contrast-to-noise ratio for the arterial phase was significantly higher at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T (30.2 ± 21.4 vs. 35.2 ± 22.9; P = 0.04), we found similar values for the hepatocyte phase (38.2 ± 24.6 vs. 38.4 ± 25.3; P = 0.762). Matched pairs analysis indicated that the relative tumor-liver contrast was better in 7 and 9 lesions in the arterial phase and hepatocyte phase at 3.0 T, respectively, than those at 1.5 T. The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of 3.0-T imaging [Az, 0.988; 92.6% (n = 50)] were slightly higher than those of 1.5-T imaging [Az, 0.981; 88.9% (n = 48)], but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.487).
CONCLUSIONS: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIs at 1.5 and 3.0 T showed similar diagnostic performances for detecting small HCCs. However, there was a tendency toward increased reader confidence for the arterial phase and hepatocyte phase with 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21467946     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318217b8fb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  11 in total

1.  Change in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions Using Gadoxetate Disodium Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Rizwan Aslam; Stefanie Weinstein; Benjamin M Yeh; Carlos U Corvera; Alex Monto; Judy Yee
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for uveal melanoma liver metastasis detection.

Authors:  Mathilde Wagner; Pascale Mariani; François Clément Bidard; Manuel Jorge Rodrigues; Fereshteh Farkhondeh; Nathalie Cassoux; Sophie Piperno-Neumann; Slavomir Petras; Vincent Servois
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Performance of adding hepatobiliary phase image in magnetic resonance imaging for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jielin Pan; Wenjuan Li; Lingjing Gu; Chaoran Liu; Ke Zhang; Guobin Hong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  JSH Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2014 Update by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Osamu Matsui; Namiki Izumi; Hiroko Iijima; Masumi Kadoya; Yasuharu Imai; Takuji Okusaka; Shiro Miyayama; Kaoru Tsuchiya; Kazuomi Ueshima; Atsushi Hiraoka; Masafumi Ikeda; Sadahisa Ogasawara; Tatsuya Yamashita; Tetsuya Minami; Koichiro Yamakado
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 5.  Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Seung Duk Lee; Seong Hoon Kim
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  An Tang; Mustafa R Bashir; Michael T Corwin; Irene Cruite; Christoph F Dietrich; Richard K G Do; Eric C Ehman; Kathryn J Fowler; Hero K Hussain; Reena C Jha; Adib R Karam; Adrija Mamidipalli; Robert M Marks; Donald G Mitchell; Tara A Morgan; Michael A Ohliger; Amol Shah; Kim-Nhien Vu; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Intravital assessment of angioarchitecture in rat hepatocellular nodules using in vivo fluorescent microscopy.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Tao Lu; Congcong Wang; Hui Li; Ke Xu; Peiling Li
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-06

8.  Intraindividual comparison of MRI-derived liver surface nodularity score at 1.5 T and 3 T.

Authors:  Weon Jang; Ji Soo Song; Tae-Hoon Kim; Kwon-Ha Yoon
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 9.  Considerations regarding current diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  C G Cristea; I A Gheonea; L D Săndulescu; D I Gheonea; T Ciurea; M R Purcarea
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 10.  Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Jun Liu; Han Ouyang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.