Young Kon Kim1, Chong Soo Kim, Young Min Han, Hee Chul Yu, Dongil Choi. 1. Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine. Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center,Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. jmyr@dreamwiz.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T for the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and compare with that at 1.5 T. MATERIALS: Forty patients with 54 HCCs (size range: 0.6-2.0 cm) underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIs at both 1.5 and 3.0 T with 3 to 8 days interval. The MRIs were compared quantitatively by measuring tumor-liver contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitatively by evaluating tumor-liver contrast using matched pairs analysis. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity were also evaluated by the consensus readings of 2 reviewers using the alternative-free response receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method. RESULTS: Although the tumor-liver contrast-to-noise ratio for the arterial phase was significantly higher at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T (30.2 ± 21.4 vs. 35.2 ± 22.9; P = 0.04), we found similar values for the hepatocyte phase (38.2 ± 24.6 vs. 38.4 ± 25.3; P = 0.762). Matched pairs analysis indicated that the relative tumor-liver contrast was better in 7 and 9 lesions in the arterial phase and hepatocyte phase at 3.0 T, respectively, than those at 1.5 T. The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of 3.0-T imaging [Az, 0.988; 92.6% (n = 50)] were slightly higher than those of 1.5-T imaging [Az, 0.981; 88.9% (n = 48)], but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.487). CONCLUSIONS: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIs at 1.5 and 3.0 T showed similar diagnostic performances for detecting small HCCs. However, there was a tendency toward increased reader confidence for the arterial phase and hepatocyte phase with 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T.
PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T for the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and compare with that at 1.5 T. MATERIALS: Forty patients with 54 HCCs (size range: 0.6-2.0 cm) underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIs at both 1.5 and 3.0 T with 3 to 8 days interval. The MRIs were compared quantitatively by measuring tumor-liver contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitatively by evaluating tumor-liver contrast using matched pairs analysis. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity were also evaluated by the consensus readings of 2 reviewers using the alternative-free response receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method. RESULTS: Although the tumor-liver contrast-to-noise ratio for the arterial phase was significantly higher at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T (30.2 ± 21.4 vs. 35.2 ± 22.9; P = 0.04), we found similar values for the hepatocyte phase (38.2 ± 24.6 vs. 38.4 ± 25.3; P = 0.762). Matched pairs analysis indicated that the relative tumor-liver contrast was better in 7 and 9 lesions in the arterial phase and hepatocyte phase at 3.0 T, respectively, than those at 1.5 T. The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of 3.0-T imaging [Az, 0.988; 92.6% (n = 50)] were slightly higher than those of 1.5-T imaging [Az, 0.981; 88.9% (n = 48)], but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.487). CONCLUSIONS:Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIs at 1.5 and 3.0 T showed similar diagnostic performances for detecting small HCCs. However, there was a tendency toward increased reader confidence for the arterial phase and hepatocyte phase with 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T.
Authors: Thomas A Hope; Rizwan Aslam; Stefanie Weinstein; Benjamin M Yeh; Carlos U Corvera; Alex Monto; Judy Yee Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2017 May/Jun Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: An Tang; Mustafa R Bashir; Michael T Corwin; Irene Cruite; Christoph F Dietrich; Richard K G Do; Eric C Ehman; Kathryn J Fowler; Hero K Hussain; Reena C Jha; Adib R Karam; Adrija Mamidipalli; Robert M Marks; Donald G Mitchell; Tara A Morgan; Michael A Ohliger; Amol Shah; Kim-Nhien Vu; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 11.105