| Literature DB >> 27799064 |
Mohammad K Eldomery1, Zeynep C Akdemir1, F-Nora Vögtle2, Wu-Lin Charng1, Patrycja Mulica2, Jill A Rosenfeld1, Tomasz Gambin1, Shen Gu1, Lindsay C Burrage1,3, Aisha Al Shamsi4, Samantha Penney1, Shalini N Jhangiani5, Holly H Zimmerman6, Donna M Muzny5, Xia Wang1,7, Jia Tang8, Ravi Medikonda9, Prasanna V Ramachandran1,9, Lee-Jun Wong1,7, Eric Boerwinkle5,10, Richard A Gibbs1,5, Christine M Eng1,7, Seema R Lalani1,3, Jozef Hertecant4, Richard J Rodenburg11, Omar A Abdul-Rahman6, Yaping Yang1,7, Fan Xia1,7, Meng C Wang1,9, James R Lupski1,3,5,12, Chris Meisinger2, V Reid Sutton13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial presequence proteases perform fundamental functions as they process about 70 % of all mitochondrial preproteins that are encoded in the nucleus and imported posttranslationally. The mitochondrial intermediate presequence protease MIP/Oct1, which carries out precursor processing, has not yet been established to have a role in human disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27799064 PMCID: PMC5088683 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-016-0360-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Med ISSN: 1756-994X Impact factor: 11.117
Fig. 1Import of nuclear-encoded proteins into mitochondria and their processing. This process is guided by N-terminal presequences that direct import across the mitochondrial outer and inner membranes through translocons. Precursor processing by MPP and MIP/Oct1 removes the presequence and an additional octapeptide resulting in the mature, stable protein
Fig. 2a Pedigree structure and segregation analysis for MIPEP variants in four families. b Evolutionary conservation of MIPEP variants among different species at the variant positions found in the study subjects
MIPEP variants in four unrelated patients from four unrelated families
| Patient ID | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zygosity | Compound heterozygous | Compound heterozygous | Homozygous | Compound heterozygous |
| Nucleotide change(s) | c.1745 T > G; c.212 T > A | c.916C > T; c.1804G > T | c.1027A > G | c.1534C > G; NA |
| Protein change(s) | p.L582R; p.L71Q | p.L306F; p.E602* | p.K343E | p.H512D; NA |
| db SNP ID(s) | NA | rs143912947, NA | NA | NA |
| ExAC frequency | NA | 8.2 × 10−6, NA | NA | 3.2 × 10−5, NA |
| Mutation Taster | D | D | D | D, NA |
| SIFT | D | D | D | D |
| PolyPhen-2 | 0.99, 1.00 | 0.98, NA | 0.97 | 1.00, NA |
| CADD 1.0 (Phred-like) | 29.9, 28.0 | 29.5, 48 | 28.5 | 33, NA |
| Metabolic myopathy features | Examination of skeletal muscle showed: | Examination of quadriceps muscle by light microscopy showed: | NA | Light and electron microscopic findings of the skeletal muscle (diaphragm) and cardiac muscle showed: |
CADD (Phred-like) scores ≥20 indicate the variants are among the top 1 % of the most deleterious variants in the genome
D damaging, NA not applicable, PAS periodic acid–Schiff
Fig. 3In vivo analysis of MIPEP-derived SNVs in the homologous Oct1 protein from S. cerevisiae. a Immunoblot analysis of mitochondria isolated from oct1Δ yeast cells transformed with plasmids encoding wild-type Oct1 (Oct1 ) or Oct1 mutants (L83Q, L339F, K376E) under the endogenous promoter or the empty control plasmid (e.v.). Cells were grown at 24 °C on a fermentable carbon source prior to organelle isolation. b Growth of yeast strains expressing Oct1WT or mutants Oct1L339F and Oct1K376E. Plasmid shuffling generated strains and growth behavior assessed on fermentative and respiratory carbon sources at low (23 °C) and high (37–38 °C) temperature. c Immunodecoration of mitochondria isolated from strains shown in b after cell growth for 10 h at 37 °C under respiratory conditions (non-fermentable carbon source). i processing intermediate, m mature protein, p precursor
Fig. 4In organello processing activity of Oct1L339F and Oct1K376E mutants. a–c In vitro import and processing of radiolabeled Mdh1, Cox4, and Mrp21 preproteins in isolated mitochondria (Mito.) from indicated mutant strains compared to wild type (Oct1 ). d In vitro import and processing of the Oct1-independent preprotein Atp2. The reaction was performed as in a–c. Δψ is the mitochondrial membrane potential. i processing intermediate, m mature protein, p precursor