Hsun-Ming Chang1,2, Jie Qiao3, Peter C K Leung4. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing 100191, P.R. China. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Room 317, 950 West 28 Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 4H4. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing 100191, P.R. China peter.leung@ubc.ca jie.qiao@263.net. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Room 317, 950 West 28 Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 4H4 peter.leung@ubc.ca jie.qiao@263.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Initially identified for their capability to induce heterotopic bone formation, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are multifunctional growth factors that belong to the transforming growth factor β superfamily. Using cellular and molecular genetic approaches, recent studies have implicated intra-ovarian BMPs as potent regulators of ovarian follicular function. The bi-directional communication of oocytes and the surrounding somatic cells is mandatory for normal follicle development and oocyte maturation. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the physiological role and molecular determinants of these ovarian regulatory factors within the human germline-somatic regulatory loop. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The regulation of ovarian function remains poorly characterized in humans because, while the fundamental process of follicular development and oocyte maturation is highly similar across species, most information on the regulation of ovarian function is obtained from studies using rodent models. Thus, this review focuses on the studies that used human biological materials to gain knowledge about human ovarian biology and disorders and to develop strategies for preventing, diagnosing and treating these abnormalities. SEARCH METHODS: Relevant English-language publications describing the roles of BMPs or growth differentiation factors (GDFs) in human ovarian biology and phenotypes were comprehensively searched using PubMed and the Google Scholar database. The publications included those published since the initial identification of BMPs in the mammalian ovary in 1999 through July 2016. OUTCOMES: Studies using human biological materials have revealed the expression of BMPs, GDFs and their putative receptors as well as their molecular signaling in the fundamental cells (oocyte, cumulus/granulosa cells (GCs) and theca/stroma cells) of the ovarian follicles throughout follicle development. With the availability of recombinant human BMPs/GDFs and the development of immortalized human cell lines, functional studies have demonstrated the physiological role of intra-ovarian BMPs/GDFs in all aspects of ovarian functions, from follicle development to steroidogenesis, cell-cell communication, oocyte maturation, ovulation and luteal function. Furthermore, there is crosstalk between these potent ovarian regulators and the endocrine signaling system. Dysregulation or naturally occurring mutations within the BMP system may lead to several female reproductive diseases. The latest development of recombinant BMPs, synthetic BMP inhibitors, gene therapy and tools for BMP-ligand sequestration has made the BMP pathway a potential therapeutic target in certain human fertility disorders; however, further clinical trials are needed. Recent studies have indicated that GDF8 is an intra-ovarian factor that may play a novel role in regulating ovarian functions in the human ovary. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Intra-ovarian BMPs/GDFs are critical regulators of folliculogenesis and human ovarian functions. Any dysregulation or variations in these ligands or their receptors may affect the related intracellular signaling and influence ovarian functions, which accounts for several reproductive pathologies and infertility. Understanding the normal and pathological roles of intra-ovarian BMPs/GDFs, especially as related to GC functions and follicular fluid levels, will inform innovative approaches to fertility regulation and improve the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian disorders.
BACKGROUND: Initially identified for their capability to induce heterotopic bone formation, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are multifunctional growth factors that belong to the transforming growth factor β superfamily. Using cellular and molecular genetic approaches, recent studies have implicated intra-ovarian BMPs as potent regulators of ovarian follicular function. The bi-directional communication of oocytes and the surrounding somatic cells is mandatory for normal follicle development and oocyte maturation. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the physiological role and molecular determinants of these ovarian regulatory factors within the human germline-somatic regulatory loop. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The regulation of ovarian function remains poorly characterized in humans because, while the fundamental process of follicular development and oocyte maturation is highly similar across species, most information on the regulation of ovarian function is obtained from studies using rodent models. Thus, this review focuses on the studies that used human biological materials to gain knowledge about human ovarian biology and disorders and to develop strategies for preventing, diagnosing and treating these abnormalities. SEARCH METHODS: Relevant English-language publications describing the roles of BMPs or growth differentiation factors (GDFs) in human ovarian biology and phenotypes were comprehensively searched using PubMed and the Google Scholar database. The publications included those published since the initial identification of BMPs in the mammalian ovary in 1999 through July 2016. OUTCOMES: Studies using human biological materials have revealed the expression of BMPs, GDFs and their putative receptors as well as their molecular signaling in the fundamental cells (oocyte, cumulus/granulosa cells (GCs) and theca/stroma cells) of the ovarian follicles throughout follicle development. With the availability of recombinant human BMPs/GDFs and the development of immortalized human cell lines, functional studies have demonstrated the physiological role of intra-ovarian BMPs/GDFs in all aspects of ovarian functions, from follicle development to steroidogenesis, cell-cell communication, oocyte maturation, ovulation and luteal function. Furthermore, there is crosstalk between these potent ovarian regulators and the endocrine signaling system. Dysregulation or naturally occurring mutations within the BMP system may lead to several female reproductive diseases. The latest development of recombinant BMPs, synthetic BMP inhibitors, gene therapy and tools for BMP-ligand sequestration has made the BMP pathway a potential therapeutic target in certain humanfertility disorders; however, further clinical trials are needed. Recent studies have indicated that GDF8 is an intra-ovarian factor that may play a novel role in regulating ovarian functions in the human ovary. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Intra-ovarian BMPs/GDFs are critical regulators of folliculogenesis and human ovarian functions. Any dysregulation or variations in these ligands or their receptors may affect the related intracellular signaling and influence ovarian functions, which accounts for several reproductive pathologies and infertility. Understanding the normal and pathological roles of intra-ovarian BMPs/GDFs, especially as related to GC functions and follicular fluid levels, will inform innovative approaches to fertility regulation and improve the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian disorders.
In humans, the ovarian follicle is the core functional unit of the female reproductive
system, which may correspond to different developmental stages in the ovary. During the
female reproductive cycle, these follicles progress through a highly coordinated
regulatory process that involves several neural, neuroendocrine, endocrine and
paracrine/autocrine control systems to achieve full ovulatory and steroidogenic
capability (Gougeon, 1996). The primary
roles of the pituitary gonadotrophin hormones, FSH and LH, GnRH and the gonadal hormones
(estrogen, androgen and progesterone) in the female reproductive system are well
established. However, normal ovarian function and follicular development also depend on
a variety of locally produced growth factors and cytokines that exert their effects in a
paracrine/autocrine fashion (Knight and Glister,
2006). In the last few decades, studies on a variety of species have
demonstrated that members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)
superfamily, which include bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), growth differentiation
factors (GDFs), TGF-βs, activins and inhibins, and anti-Müllerian hormone
(AMH), are expressed in the ovary and play essential roles in the regulation of
folliculogenesis, oogenesis and ovarian functions (Gougeon, 1996; Juengel and McNatty,
2005; Knight and Glister, 2006).
With over 20 members, BMPs/GDFs constitute the largest subfamily of the TGF-β
superfamily and were initially identified as osteoinductive cytokines that may promote
bone and cartilage formation (Wang ; Wagner
). Several publications have documented that
locally produced BMPs are implicated in the formation and function of mammalian germ
cells and that they participate in the regulation of ovarian functions (Yi ; Shimasaki ;
Khan ;
Rossi ).
Moreover, naturally occurring gene mutations of BMP ligands and dysregulated BMP
signaling are associated with prominent pathologies of human reproduction (Persani ; Qin ).While the fundamental process of follicular development is highly similar across
species, most information on the regulation of ovarian function is obtained from studies
in rodents. Our understanding of the development and function of the human ovary has
advanced only recently due to a combination of technologies including recombinant human
BMPs/GDFs, immortalized human granulosa cell (GC) lines, tissue microarrays and
pharmaceutical development. Thus a significant portion of this review is devoted to the
human ovarian physiologies and human reproductive disorders associated with BMP/GDF
signaling.
Methods
A comprehensive literature review was conducted using two databases, PubMed and Google
Scholar to identify and retrieve information relevant to the field of BMP/GDF biology in
the human ovary, since its initial identification in the mammalian ovary in 1999 (Shimasaki )
through July 2016. A systematic review of English-language publications was carried out
using the following keywords: BMP, GDF, human ovary, human GCs, human GC line, female
infertility and therapeutic targets. The goal of this review is to provide an overview
of the current knowledge of the physiological roles of BMPs and GDFs in human female
reproduction and their potential therapeutic application for regulation of
fertility.
BMPs and BMP receptors
BMP ligands
BMPs consist of an extensive subfamily of phylogenetically conserved growth factors
in the TGF-β superfamily with critical physiological functions in
organogenesis and morphogenesis in both invertebrates and vertebrates (Hogan, 1996; Bier and De Robertis, 2015). In the modern nomenclature,
BMPs are regarded as encompassing growth factors that are either BMPs or GDFs due to
the overlap between the two classification systems without significant separate
lineages (Rider and Mulloy, 2010) (Fig.
1). Similar to other members of the
TGF-β superfamily, BMPs are initially translated as a similar structure
consisting of three components: a signal peptide, a prodomain and a mature peptide
(mature domain). The signal peptide (20–30 amino acids long) is present at the
N-terminal end of the newly synthesized large preproproteins, and it directs these
ligands for proper secretion out of the cells (Veitia and Caburet, 2009). The BMPs share a conserved structure: the seven
characteristically spaced cysteine residues indicative of the cysteine-knot motif of
the TGF-β superfamily (Shi and
Massague, 2003). Six of these cysteine residues can form intramolecular
disulfide bonds known as cysteine knots, and the seventh cysteine is involved in the
dimerization with another monomer via a disulfide bond to form homodimers or
heterodimers (Sun and Davies, 1995).
However, BMP15 and GDF9 are two of the few TGF-β members with only six
cysteine residues in their cysteine-knot domain, each lacking the one cysteine
residue responsible for covalent dimer formation (McIntosh ). The inactive BMP
precursors are proteolytically cleaved by a proprotein convertase family, proprotein
convertase Subtilisin/Kexin, which is composed of nine members named
PCSK1–PCSK9 (Seidah and Prat,
2012). At least one member of this family, PCSK3 (furin), recognizes the
amino acid motif -Arg-X-Arg/Lys-Arg- at the linker site between the prodomain and the
mature domain and activates the mature BMP homodimers or heterodimers (Harrison ).
Several BMP heterodimers, such as BMP2/BMP7, BMP2/BMP6, BMP4/BMP7 and BMP15/GDF9,
have been suggested to exist and function both in vivo and
in vitro (Israel ; Little and
Mullins, 2009; Valera ; Peng
). Most of these BMP heterodimers are more
biologically potent than their respective homodimers in inducing cellular functions
(Israel ; Valera ; Peng ). The most likely explanation for these differential effects is that
the heterodimer activity could be mediated by a different or an additional receptor
subtype.
Figure 1
Phylogenetic relationship of the BMP/GDF subfamily members. The alignment of
21 BMP/GDF-related ligands was based on published literature: (Ducy and Karsenty, 2000; Mazerbourg and Hsueh, 2006; Rider and Mulloy, 2010). Ligands
with an asterisk are expressed in the human ovary. BMP/GDF, bone
morphogenetic protein/growth differentiation factor.
Phylogenetic relationship of the BMP/GDF subfamily members. The alignment of
21 BMP/GDF-related ligands was based on published literature: (Ducy and Karsenty, 2000; Mazerbourg and Hsueh, 2006; Rider and Mulloy, 2010). Ligands
with an asterisk are expressed in the human ovary. BMP/GDF, bone
morphogenetic protein/growth differentiation factor.It has been widely argued that the biological action of oocyte-derived BMP15 and GDF9
is redundant or synergistic. Evidence from a study of Bmp15 and
Gdf9 double knockout mice demonstrated that there is a biological
cooperation between these two growth factors (Yan ). There is a great debate as to whether
such cooperation results from the synergistic interaction of BMP15 and GDF9
homodimers or from the existence of a biologically active BMP15/GDF9 heterodimer
(Mottershead ; Peng ; Persani ). Interestingly, the BMP15/GDF9 heterodimer can be
produced and secreted in 293 T cells (a specific cell line originally derived from
human embryonic kidney cells) when two constructs are co-expressed (Liao ).
Indeed, the humanBMP15/GDF9 heterodimer is approximately 1000- to 3000-fold more
potent than the humanBMP15 homodimer (Peng
).
BMP receptors
TGF-β superfamily members signal through distinct sets of transmembrane
serine/threonine kinase receptors (type I and type II receptors), which further
regulate downstream gene expression by phosphorylating the Sma- and Mad-related
protein (SMAD) transcription factors (Shi and
Massague, 2003). To date, five distinct type II receptors (BMPR2, ACVR2A,
ACVR2B, TβR2 and AMHR2) and seven type I receptors (also known as activin
receptor like-kinase; ALK1–7) have been identified in mammals (Massague, 1998; Miyazono ). All of these
receptors share a very similar structure consisting of an extracellular domain
(N-terminal), a transmembrane domain and an intracellular domain with Ser/Thr kinase
activity (C-terminal). Each ligand of the TGF-β superfamily members can bind
to the N-terminal extracellular domains of different combinations of type II and type
I receptors and trigger downstream signaling complexes (Massague, 1998; Miyazono ). Of the five type I receptors,
three (BMPR2, ACVR2A and ACVR2B) are employed by one or more BMPs. Likewise, six
(ALK2-7) of the seven type I receptors have been implicated in BMP-induced
intracellular signaling (Macias-Silva
; Kaivo-Oja ; Moore ; Mazerbourg and Hsueh, 2006; Miyagi ). Receptors and
signaling pathways utilized for various intra-ovarian BMPs/GDFs in human cells are
listed in Table I.
Table I
Putative receptors and signaling pathways of BMPs/GDFs in the human
ovary.
Ligand
Type II receptor
Type I receptor
SMAD
References
BMP2
BMPR2, ACVR2A
ALK3/6
SMAD1/5/8
Mazerbourg and
Hsueh (2006)
BMP4
BMPR2, ACVR2A
ALK3/6
SMAD1/5/8
Miyagi et
al. (2012)
Chang et
al. (2015a, 2015c)
ALK3/4/5
SMAD2/3
Zhang et
al. (2016)
BMP6
BMPR2, ACVR2A
ALK2/3/6
SMAD1/5/8
Mazerbourg and
Hsueh (2006)
BMP7
BMPR2, ACVR2A
ALK2/3/6
SMAD1/5/8
Macias-Silva
et al. (1998)
Chang et
al. (2015a, 2015b, 2015c)
BMP15
BMPR2
ALK3/6
SMAD1/5/8
Moore et
al. (2003)
Chang et
al. (2013a)
GDF8
ACVR2A, ACVR2B
ALK5
SMAD2/3
Chang et
al. (2015d)
Chang et
al. (2016a, 2016b, 2016c)
GDF9
BMPR2
ALK5
SMAD2/3
Mazerbourg and
Hsueh (2006)
Kaivo-Oja
et al. (2003)
ACVR, activin receptor; ALK, activin receptor-like kinase; BMP, bone
morphogenetic protein; BMPR, bone morphogenetic protein receptor; GDF,
growth differentiation factor; SMAD, Sma- and Mad-related protein.
Putative receptors and signaling pathways of BMPs/GDFs in the human
ovary.ACVR, activin receptor; ALK, activin receptor-like kinase; BMP, bone
morphogenetic protein; BMPR, bone morphogenetic protein receptor; GDF,
growth differentiation factor; SMAD, Sma- and Mad-related protein.
BMP signaling
Members of the TGF-β superfamily exert their functions by binding to type I
and type II receptors, which further regulate downstream target gene expression by
phosphorylating the receptor-regulatory SMAD (R-SMAD) transcription factors,
SMAD1–8. Generally, two distinct models of the ligand–receptor
interaction exist. BMPs, AMH and some GDFs activate SMAD1/5/8 via ALK2, ALK3 and/or
ALK6; whereas, TGF-βs, activins and nodal activate SMAD2/3 via ALK4, ALK5
and/or ALK7 (Drummond, 2005; Mueller and Nickel, 2012). Upon
phosphorylation of type I receptors, BMPs activate the canonical SMAD1/5/8 group,
which then associate with the common SMAD (SMAD4), and this complex translocates to
the nucleus to exert functions that regulate gene expression in most tissues.Quite recently, novel non-canonical SMAD2/3 signaling (commonly induced by
TGF-βs and activins) activated by BMPs to regulate cancer progression and
hormone production has been given considerable attention (Holtzhausen ; Wang ). In
humangranulosa tumor cells and mouse GCs, recombinant humanBMP15, but not mouseBMP15, mildly phosphorylated SMAD2/3 and stimulated mouse cumulus–oocyte
complex (COC) expansion (Peng ). In line with these reports challenging the standard
guideline that BMPs exert cellular functions solitarily through canonical SMAD1/5/8
signaling, our most recent studies showed that BMPs-induced hyaluronan
synthase type 2 (HAS2) expression is mediated by
noncanonical SMAD2/3 signaling through binding to ALK4/5/7 in immortalized human GCs
(Zhang ). Differences in receptor expression levels and receptor binding
properties between different BMPs (homodimers or heterodimers) most likely contribute
to the differential activation of noncanonical SMAD2/3 signaling in certain cell
types.In addition to the SMAD signaling, several SMAD-independent (non-SMAD) signaling
pathways for BMPs have been identified in specific tissues. It is widely believed
that the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal pathway is the major
SMAD-independent pathway induced by BMPs. BMP4 has been found to phosphorylate
TGF-β activated kinase 1, a serine/threonine kinase of the MAPKKK family
(Yamaguchi ; Derynck and Zhang,
2003). Previous studies indicate that BMPs are also able to activate several
signaling pathways, including phosphoinositide 3-kinase, extracellular
signal-regulated kinase (ERK), protein kinase (PK) A, PKC and PKD (PKCμ)
(Yamaguchi ; Nakamura ; von Bubnoff
and Cho, 2001). Interestingly, our recent study showed that the BMP
subfamily member GDF8 decreases steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR)
expression by activating both the SMAD3 and ERK signaling pathways (Fang ). Upon
ligand–receptor binding and interaction, the subsequent pathway activated by
BMPs is most likely dependent on other cellular activity, the extracellular
environment and crosstalk with other signaling pathways.
Intra-ovarian BMPs and oocyte–somatic cell interactions
Human GC lines
To clearly understand the underlying mechanisms by which hormones or growth factors
regulate folliculogenesis and ovarian steroidogenesis, available cell models that are
suitable for in vitro studies are warranted. GC-based in
vitro cell model systems have provided valuable tools for studying
ovarian biology. The major source of human GCs for in vitro studies
is usually from infertilepatients undergoing IVF. However, these cells are
obtainable only in small numbers, which make it difficult to conduct extensive
experiments related to detailed molecular analysis. In addition, the clinically
obtained GCs are generally luteinized because of their extensive stimulation with
FSH/LH and hCG prior to cell isolation. Therefore, these GCs have a limited life span
with a slow proliferation rate, and they do not survive in vitro for
many passages (Breckwoldt ). Furthermore, primary GCs derived from different
patients may exhibit wide variability, which adds to the difficulty of obtaining
reproducible results. Because of these obstacles, a substitute human GC line has
become an attractive option. In the last few years, there has been a growing interest
in developing several cell lines from human GCs (Table II). These cell lines were generated through various
techniques, including oncogenic transformation (Rainey ; Lie ; Hosokawa ;
Nitta ;
Tajima ; Okamura ), transfection with site-directed mutagenesis (Bayasula ) and explants of
humantumors (Ishiwata ; van den Berg-Bakker ; Nishi
). Notably, each cell line may have
different cell properties with regard to steroidogenic functions, gonadotrophin (FSH
and LH) responsiveness, cAMP responsiveness, BMP responsiveness, and mitogenic and
differential capabilities (Havelock ) (Table II). Therefore, it is essential to choose the appropriate cell line for
individual studies. For instance, the SVOG cell line was developed by transfection of
human granulosa-lutein (hGL) cells using SV40 large T antigen (Lie ) (Table II). Primary hGL cells were used to
generate the immortalized cells and the two display similar biological responses to
many different treatments, such as LH, hCG, cAMP and various growth factors (Lie ). As
demonstrated in numerous previous publications from our laboratory as well as those
of other investigators, these cells are a widely accepted model to study the ovarian
response during the periovulatory and early luteal phases (Havelock ; Chang , 2015c, 2016c, 2016a;
Fang ).
COV434 and KGN are two widely used GC lines originating from ovarian GC tumors (van den Berg-Bakker ; Zhang ; Nishi ). Unfortunately, the development of an androgen-producing thecal cell
line has faced a tough challenge with limited success (Magoffin and Erickson, 1988; McAllister ).
Table II
The cellular properties of human ovarian GC lines.
Cell line
Origin
Transfection
Progesterone production
Aromatase activity
Steroidogenic enzyme
FSH response
LH/hCG response
cAMP response
BMP response
References
SVOG
Luteinized GC
SV40 T
(+)
(−)
(+)
(−)
(+)
(+)
(+)
Lie et
al. (1996)
HGL5
Luteinized GC
HPV16E6/E7
(+)
(+)
(+)
(−)
(−)
(+)
(+)
Rainey et
al. (1994)
HO-23
Luteinized GC
SV40 T, Ha-ras p53
(+)
ND
(+)
ND
(−)
(+)
ND
Hosokawa
et al. (1998)
HGP53
Luteinized GC
Ha-ras & p53val135
(+)
ND
(+)
(+)
ND
(+)
ND
Takebayashi
et al. (2000)
GC1a
Non-luteinized GC
Mouse SF-1
(−)
(−)
(−)
(−)
(−)
ND
ND
Nitta et
al. (2001)
Okamura
et al. (2003)
HGrC1
Non-luteinized GC
HPV16E6/E7, CDK4R24C, cyclin D1
(+)
(+)
(+)
(+)
(+)
ND
(+)
Bayasula
et al. (2012)
COV434
Metastatic GC tumor
(+)
(+)
(−)
(+)
(−)
(+)
(+)
van den
Berg-Bakker et al. (1993)
KGN
GC carcinoma
(+)
(+)
(−)
(+)
(−)
(+)
(+)
Nishi et
al. (2001)
HTOG
Granulosa-theca cell tumor
(+)
(+)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ishiwata
et al. (1984)
GC, granulosa cell; ND, Not documented.
The cellular properties of human ovarian GC lines.GC, granulosa cell; ND, Not documented.
Expression of BMPs and BMP receptors in the human ovary
A number of studies performed over the past decade have provided important
information about the expression of the BMP system in the mammalian ovary, with the
most comprehensive study using adult cycling rats (Erickson and Shimasaki, 2003; Shimasaki ). However, the
expression pattern of BMPs in the rat ovary may not necessarily apply to other
species. For instance, BMP4 and BMP7 are primarily expressed by theca and stroma
cells in rats (Erickson and Shimasaki,
2003); however, both BMP4 and BMP7 have been detected in human oocytes
(Abir ).
GDF9 has been identified in hGL cells and oocytes (Aaltonen ; Teixeira Filho ; Huang ; Shi ), but GDF9 is exclusively expressed in the oocytes of ovine and bovineovaries (Bodensteiner ; Hayashi ). Likewise, BMP15, which was previously thought to be
oocyte-derived (Aaltonen ), has been detected in human cumulus cells (Li ), GCs and
stroma cells in girls and adults (Margulis
). The development and physiological
functions of the human reproductive system are mostly influenced by the
tissue-specific and time-dependent expression of BMP subfamily members (Shimasaki ),
even though the spatiotemporal expression pattern of BMPs in the human ovary remains
largely unknown. The expression of BMP/GDF ligands and their receptors in human
ovarian tissues is listed in Table III.
In the human ovary, BMP2, BMP4, BMP5, BMP6, BMP7 and BMP8A are expressed in the GCs
from normally cycling and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women (Khalaf ). In
concert with this study, a study using isolated human pre-antral follicles that
compared the expression levels of BMPs in five size-matched populations demonstrated
that BMP6 and BMP15 are the most abundantly expressed ligands (Kristensen ). In the human
corpus luteum, BMP2, BMP4 and BMP6 are highly expressed in the granulosa-lutein and
theca-lutein cells and are involved in the process of luteolysis (Nio-Kobayashi ).
Table III
Localization of BMPs/GDFs and receptors in the human ovary.
Localization of BMPs/GDFs and receptors in the human ovary.BMR, bone morphogenetic proteins; GDF, growth differentiation factors;
CL, corpora lutea; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FF,
follicular fluid; IHC, immunohistochemistry; RT-qPCR, quantitative
real-time PCR.aExpressed only in fetal ovary.During the antral follicular stage, the growth and maturation of the oocyte are
dependent on several intra-ovarian factors present in the follicular fluid (Hsieh ). The
concentrations of some of the follicular fluid growth factors are correlated with the
serum levels of these factors (Qiao and Feng,
2011). The imbalance of any of these intra-ovarian factors may lead to
abnormal follicular development and dysfunction of oocyte maturation in humans (Franks ; Qiao and Feng, 2011). Recent studies have
shown that BMP2, BMP4, BMP7, BMP15, GDF8 and GDF9 are detectable in the follicular
fluid (Table III) (Sugiyama ;
Wu ;
Chang ;
Chang ). Among these follicular fluid BMPs, the results from clinical data
suggested that BMP2 and BMP15 may potentially be used as indicators of oocyte
fertilization and/or oocyte maturation (Wu
; Sugiyama ).Previous research has documented the expression of the mRNA and protein of BMP
receptors in various follicular compartments of pre-antral and antral follicles of
the human ovary (Khalaf ; Kristensen
). Among these receptors, BMPR2 is the most
abundantly expressed type II receptor (Kristensen ). In comparison with the type I
receptors ALK1, ALK2 and ALK7, four type I receptors ALK3, ALK4, ALK5 and ALK6 are
expressed at modest levels in the human pre-antral follicles (Kristensen ). A recent study
showed that the dysregulation of ALK6 in human GCs is associated with reduced ovarian
reserve and the age-related decline in fertility (Regan ).
BMPs and primordial germ cell development
Primordial germ cells (PGCs), the precursors of the sperm and egg in the adult, are a
group of germline stem cells that develop only during the early embryonic stage
(McLaren, 2003). These stem cells
migrate to the primitive gonadal fold and mitotically proliferate to increase cell
numbers, which subsequently differentiate into primordial follicles (oocytes
associate with the surrounding somatic cells) (Pepling and Spradling, 2001). Members of the BMP subfamily play critical
roles in regulating ovarian development and function (Shimasaki ; Knight and Glister, 2006). However, the
developmental processes are differentially regulated in rodents and humans with
respect to the spatiotemporal organization (Lawson ; Childs ). In mouse embryos,
the extraembryonic ectoderm-derived BMP4 and BMP8B collaboratively induce PGC
formation (Ying ). In human fetal ovaries, BMP4 and BMP signaling modulates
post-migratory PGC numbers by promoting apoptosis (Childs ). During oogenesis in
humans, GDF9 is transiently secreted by oocytes before follicle formation, which is
accompanied by activin βA signaling from somatic cells to determine selective
germ cell survival (Bayne ).Schematic diagram summarizing functional roles of BMPs and GDF9 in the human
ovary. The potential physiological roles of intra-ovarian BMPs in regulating
human ovarian functions, including steroidogenesis, activin production,
cumulus–oophorus complex formation and expansion, cell–cell
communication, ovulation and luteolysis are shown. BMP, bone morphogenetic
protein; COC, cumulus–oophorus complex; Cx43, connexin 43; GC,
granulosa cell; HAS2, hyaluronan synthase type 2; PTX3, pentraxin 3; StAR,
steroidogenic acute regulatory protein.
BMPs and intra-ovarian cell–cell communication
The ovarian follicle is the principal functional unit of the female reproductive
system. A coordinated interplay within this biological compartment between the oocyte
and the follicular cells (cumulus cells/GCs and theca/stroma cells) depends heavily
on functional gap junctions (Granot and Dekel,
2002). These connexin-coupled cell junctions directly mediate
cell–cell communication by allowing the passage of small molecules (ions,
metabolites, nutrition and small signaling molecules) between two adjacent cells
(Caspar ; Makowski ). In the growing follicles in humans, connexin 43 (Cx43) primarily
contributes to the formation of gap junctions between cumulus cells/GCs, whereas gap
junctions that connect the oocyte to the surrounding cumulus cells are mainly
composed of connexin 37 (Cx37) (Furger
; Tsai ; Gershon ). Studies in knockout mice
demonstrated that mice lacking Cx43 exhibit a phenotype of reduced
germ cell numbers in the fetal gonads, retarded growth of oocytes and fertilization
failure (Ackert ). In addition, the ablation of Cx37 leads to an
abolition of intercellular coupling between oocytes and cumulus cells, disruption of
follicle development at the antral stage, incompetent oocytes and ovulatory
dysfunction (Simon ).Cx43 is abundantly expressed in the GCs throughout all follicular stages and its
expression is required for GC proliferation (Ackert ; Gittens ). The cyclic
expression of Cx43 in the GCs is developmentally and hormonally regulated by
gonadotrophins (FSH and LH) and steroid hormones (estrogen, progesterone and
androgen) in many species, including humans (Petrocelli and Lye, 1993; Granot and
Dekel, 2002; Wu ). Our recent studies have shown that three
intra-ovarian BMPs (BMP4, BMP7 and BMP15) and TGF-β1 may act in a
paracrine/autocrine manner to modulate Cx43 expression and
intercellular communication in human GCs (Fig. 2) (Chang , 2014b, 2015). Specifically, BMP-mediated signaling
suppresses Cx43 expression, whereas TGF-β1 increases
Cx43 expression, indicating competing regulatory roles for these
paracrine/autocrine factors. This functional discrepancy between the growth factors
belonging to the TGF-β superfamily of differential signaling molecules
(TGF-βs and BMPs) may influence a broad range of cellular actions.
Figure 2
Schematic diagram summarizing functional roles of BMPs and GDF9 in the human
ovary. The potential physiological roles of intra-ovarian BMPs in regulating
human ovarian functions, including steroidogenesis, activin production,
cumulus–oophorus complex formation and expansion, cell–cell
communication, ovulation and luteolysis are shown. BMP, bone morphogenetic
protein; COC, cumulus–oophorus complex; Cx43, connexin 43; GC,
granulosa cell; HAS2, hyaluronan synthase type 2; PTX3, pentraxin 3; StAR,
steroidogenic acute regulatory protein.
Oocyte-somatic cell interactions
In the mammalian ovary, oocytes do not merely reside inside the follicles and
passively receive the developmental signals from the surrounding cumulus cells/GCs,
but they actively govern and modulate follicular development and ovulation. Within
the follicular microenvironment, oocytes and the supporting somatic cells
coordinately control the development and maturation of the follicle as well as the
acquisition of a meiotically competent oocyte (Eppig, 2001). The results obtained from animal studies indicated that
oocytes might promote follicular development and cell differentiation by releasing
some growth factors that act in a paracrine manner to affect the neighboring cumulus
cells/GCs. These paracrine effects, in turn, modulate oocyte development and
maturation (Eppig, 2001). Studies in
sheep and mice have shown that the experimental ablation (removal, absence or
destruction) of the oocytes results in impaired folliculogenesis, indicating a
critical role of the oocyte factors or oocyte-induced paracrine signaling in
follicular development (Nekola and Nalbandov,
1971; Gilchrist ). An in vivo study has revealed that
ovectomy can lead to the spontaneous transformation of the Graafian follicle into the
corresponding corpus luteum (el-Fouly
). In vitro experiments
have demonstrated that oocyte-secreted factors may potently promote DNA synthesis and
cell proliferation in the surrounding cumulus/mural GCs (Vanderhyden ; Gilchrist ).
In addition, these oocyte-derived potent mitogens can also augment the effects of
several GC regulators (FSH, insulin-like growth factor-I and androgen) on cell growth
activities (Armstrong ; Fraidenraich ; Li ; Hickey
).Aside from the mitogenic effects, oocytes are potent modulators of cumulus cell/GC
differentiation in various species, including humans (Eppig, 2001). In particular, oocytes modulate the
FSH-stimulated estradiol and progesterone production by GCs (Vanderhyden, 1993; Coskun ; Vanderhyden and Tonary, 1995), whereas they suppress the
expression of LH receptor (LHR) induced by FSH in GCs (Eppig ). Apart from the
gonadotrophins secreted by the pituitary gland, oocyte-derived BMP15 and GDF9 also
participate in the modulation of certain target genes related to ovulation and
luteinization (Pangas and Matzuk, 2005;
Diaz ).
In human GCs, oocyte-derived BMP15 decreases progesterone production by
down-regulating the expression of StAR (Chang ). Collectively, these
results support a previously proposed hypothesis that the oocyte is capable of
inhibiting follicular luteinization (Fig. 2) (el-Fouly ).Data collected from the cumulus cell transcriptome revealed that bi-directional
communication between the human oocyte and cumulus cells is essential for the
production of a competent oocyte (Huang and
Wells, 2010). In this regard, the oocyte acts as a central regulator of
neighboring follicular cell function by secreting various growth factors and
cytokines to modulate cell proliferation, cell differentiation, apoptosis and
luteinization (Gilchris ). At ovulation, cumulus expansion is a complicated
process that is required for the optimal extrusion of the cumulus–oocyte cell
mass from the follicle (Russell and Robker,
2007). The cumulus expansion process and oocyte maturation are highly
dependent on the interactions of two signals induced by epidermal growth factor
(EGF)-like peptides (triggered by LH or hCG) and an oocyte-derived paracrine factor
(Hsieh ;
Fang ).
Specifically, the oocyte-derived factor capacitates the response of cumulus cells to
three EGF-like peptides, which induces the expression of several target genes
[HAS2, tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 6
(TNFAIP6), pentraxin 3 (PTX3) and
prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2)] related to
extracellular matrix formation and stability (Diaz ). Indeed, the in vitro
studies have shown that oocyte factors, GDF9 and, to a lesser extent, BMP4 and BMP7
induce HAS2 expression and hyaluronan synthesis as well as
prostaglandin E2 production, which is essential for normal ovulation
(Elvin ;
Zhang ). The knowledge obtained from cumulus–oocyte interactions during
the periovulatory stage will enable clinicians to design optimal procedures for ART,
especially the IVM protocol.
BMPs prevent premature luteinization
In humans, the LH surge stimulates multiple intra-follicular activities and triggers
ovulation (Russell and Robker, 2007).
At the time of ovulation, a series of morphological transitions and tissue remodeling
cause the ruptured ovarian follicle to develop into the corpus luteum, a temporary
endocrine structure that secretes progesterone (Oon and Johnson, 2000). The release of progesterone
targets and prepares the reproductive tract for initiation of fertilization and
maintenance of early pregnancy (Niswender
). Premature luteinization refers to an
elevation of serum progesterone levels on (or before) the day of hCG administration
in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (Al-Azemi ). The premature rise
of progesterone can shift the implantation window (synchronization between embryonic
development and endometrial receptivity), which may hamper embryo implantation and
decrease the pregnancy rate (Achache and Revel,
2006). During the antral follicle stage, one of the most important
physiological functions is the prevention of premature luteinization, which maintains
follicular growth and somatic cell proliferation (Baerwald ).Evidence from animal studies has shown that the regulation of steroid hormones by
BMPs is species- and stage-specific in the pre-antral and antral follicular stages.
In humans, some inconsistent results have been published regarding the regulatory
effects of BMPs on ovarian steroid hormone synthesis. In a humangranulosa tumor cell
line (KGN), BMP4 and BMP7 suppressed forskolin- or cAMP-induced progesterone
production without affecting forskolin- or cAMP-induced estradiol production (Miyoshi ). In
contrast, a cohort study using GCs from normal healthy women and PCOSwomen showed
that BMP7, but not BMP4, suppressed basal estradiol production, and both BMP4 and
BMP7 had no effect on FSH-induced estradiol production in the normal women (Khalaf ).
Studies using primary GCs obtained from IVFpatients showed that BMP2, BMP4 and BMP6
suppressed StAR expression, whereas BMP2 induced aromatase
expression (Shi ; Nio-Kobayashi ). Consistent with some of the previous studies, our
recent results showed that BMP4, BMP7 and BMP15 all decreased progesterone production
by down-regulating ALK3-mediated StAR expression in immortalized GCs
(SVOG cells), but not in KGN cells (Chang
; Zhang ). Moreover, BMP4 and BMP7 increased
the synthesis of bioactive activin A by up-regulating the production and
proteolytical processing of the inhibin βA subunit in human immortalized GCs
(Chang ). Activin A is another potent luteinization inhibitor because of its
ability to decrease the basal and FSH- or LH-induced progesterone production in hGL
cells (Chang ). GDF9, a close relative of BMP15, has divergent roles in the
regulation of humansteroid production. In human GCs and theca cells, GDF9 suppresses
8-bromo-cAMP-induced StAR expression and progesterone production without affecting
basal StAR protein levels or progesterone production (Yamamoto ; Shi ).Taken together, all of these studies in the human follicle cells suggest that the
secretion of BMPs from oocytes, GCs or theca/stroma cells inhibits StAR expression
and, in turn, decreases progesterone production. On the other hand, oocyte-derived
GDF9 interacts with pituitary gonadotrophins to further reduce progesterone
production (Fig. 2). After ovulation, the
dramatic decrease in GDF9 and BMP15 levels in the corpus luteum leads to elevated
StAR expression and a subsequent increase in progesterone production.
BMPs modulate COC formation and expansion
During the antral follicle stage (characterized by the formation of a fluid-filled
antrum), the original GCs that surround the oocyte differentiate into two
functionally and anatomically distinct sublineages, the cumulus cells and mural GCs.
The cumulus cells intimately interact with the oocyte to form an elaborate structure
called the COC, while mural GCs are layered against the follicle wall and close to
the basement membrane and theca/stroma cells (Albertini ). During the periovulatory stage,
these two types of GC exhibit highly divergent characteristics. In general, cumulus
cells are enriched for transcripts involved in cell proliferation and metabolism,
whereas mural GCs are enriched for transcripts associated with cell differentiation
and signaling (Wigglesworth ). In contrast to mural GCs, cumulus cells display a
higher cell proliferation rate, a higher AMH expression level, a lower steroidogenic
capacity, a lower LHR expression level and have the ability to secrete hyaluronic
acid for COC expansion (cumulus expansion) (Armstrong ; Eppig ; Li ; Grondahl ). The cumulus cells
associate with the oocyte and the extended viscoelastic extracellular matrix to form
a unique structure, the hyaluronan-rich COC matrix (Russell and Robker, 2007). Hyaluronan is the structural
backbone of this matrix, which is further stabilized by a complex network of binding
proteins, including versican, tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene 6 protein
(TSG-6), inter-α trypsin inhibitor and PTX3 (Russell and Salustri, 2006; Baranova ).At mid-cycle, the LH surge initiates the ovulatory process by decreasing
cell–cell communication, resuming oocyte meiotic maturation, generating tissue
remodeling and inducing the expansion of the COC (Russell and Robker, 2007). The cumulus expansion,
characterized by a process of morphological change involved in the proliferation and
dispersion of cumulus cells, is initiated under the control of several endocrine,
paracrine and oocyte-derived factors (Eppig,
1980; Varani ; Russell and
Robker, 2007; Fang ). In vitro studies have demonstrated
the requirement of either the oocyte or its conditioned medium for the response of
cumulus cells to EGF, FSH or cAMP in the synthesis of hyaluronan (Buccione ;
Salustri ). In cumulus cells, the key enzyme responsible for the polymerization
and elongation of the hyaluronan chains to localize into the intercellular space is a
transmembrane protein, HAS2 (Weigel ). Indeed, the humanBMP15 homodimer and mouseGDF9
are able to up-regulate the cumulus expansion-related genes (Has2,
Ptx3 and Ptgs2) in mouse GCs and promote cumulus
expansion in vitro (Peng
).In the structure of the hyaluronan-based extracellular matrix, PTX3 plays a critical
role in the assembly process. In this stable and sustainable hyaluronan network, PTX3
acts as an aggregating reagent to link to a molecule, TSG-6, which is further bound
to the distinct hyaluronan strand (Baranova
). The knockout mouse model has been used
to highlight the essential roles of PTX3 and cumulus expansion in the processes of
oocyte maturation and ovulation, efficient transportation of the oocyte through the
oviducts and in vivo fertilization (Vanderhyden and Armstrong, 1989). Mice lacking
Ptx3 display subfertility, structural defects of the COC and
failed in vivo fertilization (Varani ). Our recent study showed that BMP4
and BMP7 down-regulated the expression and protein production of PTX3 in human GCs,
indicating that BMPs may participate in extracellular matrix formation and tissue
remodeling. Collectively, we can speculate that oocyte-secreted factors (mainly BMP15
and GDF9) maintain the cumulus cell phenotype by promoting cumulus expansion, whereas
theca/stroma-derived BMPs (mainly BMP4 and BMP7) decompose the structure of the
extracellular matrix in the neighboring mural GCs to facilitate the separation of COC
and mural GCs in the human ovary (Fig. 2).
BMPs and luteal function
In the absence of pregnancy, the corpus luteum begins to regress at the end of the
luteal phase, a degradation process called luteolysis (Hussein, 2005). Luteolysis is a complicated process
involving a loss of the structural and functional integrity of the corpus luteum
accompanied by a decrease in progesterone production (Hussein, 2005). Studies using human ovarian tissues
demonstrated that the expression levels of BMP2, BMP4 and BMP6 are increased during
luteal regression and they are differentially regulated by hCG, suggesting that these
BMPs may be involved in the process of luteolysis (Nio-Kobayashi ) (Fig. 2).
Role of BMPs in female reproductive pathology
Any abnormality in the intra-ovarian BMPs or BMP signaling may negatively affect
oocyte–somatic cell interactions, steroidogenesis, GC proliferation, oocyte
maturation, cumulus expansion, ovulation, embryonic quality and luteal function, leading
to female infertility and reproductive pathology. Knocking out of Bmp4
or the depletion of Alk2 in mouse embryos results in a lack of PGC
formation (Lawson ). Genetic depletion of the Bmp6 gene in female mice
causes a decrease in number of ovulated eggs and reduced litter size (Sugiura ).
Oocyte-derived BMP15 and GDF9 are the prominent BMP/GDF associated with various ovarian
functions and ovulation rate (Persani ). Abnormal expression of these two factors may be
related to female infertility (Gilchrist
). The results from clinical data have
suggested that BMP15 levels in the follicular fluid may be used as an indicator of
oocyte quality and subsequent fertilization ability (Wu ). In addition, a couple of
BMP receptors have been shown to be involved in implantation and maternal–fetal
interactions during human pregnancy. Disruption of BMPR2-mediated signaling in the
uterine decidua leads to placental abruption, fetal demise and female sterility (Nagashima ).
During mouse pregnancy, mice carrying a conditional ablation of Alk2 in
the uterus (Alk2 cKO mice) exhibit delayed embryo invasion into the
uterine stroma, failed uterine decidualization and sterility. Likewise, ablation of
ALK2 using siRNA targeted to ALK2 in human uterine
stromal cells may alter uterine decidualization and embryo implantation, leading to
female sterility (Clementi ).
Polycystic ovary syndrome
Using immunohistochemical staining, the expression levels of BMP15 and GDF9 proteins
in the oocyte and GCs of follicles in PCOS ovaries are reduced and delayed during the
early follicular stage (Wei ). Compared with the control group, the expression
levels of BMP15 and GDF9 proteins in the oocytes tended to be higher in women with
PCOS, which could be the result of PCOS follicular dysplasia (Zhao ). However, the
expression levels of GDF9 protein in cumulus cells are lower in PCOSwomen, which may
result in premature luteinization, poor oocyte competence and luteal dysfunction,
leading to higher miscarriage rates in PCOSpatients (Zhao ). These results provide
evidence of two valuable intra-ovarian growth factors in the regulation of oocyte
maturation in the follicular microenvironment and will help in the design of a
potential technique to improve IVM protocols for oocytes from women with PCOS (Qiao and Feng, 2011). Most serum BMP
protein levels are either undetectable or at the lower limit of detection in PCOSwomen, and therefore provide limited information about this disease (van Houten ).
The data generated from genome-wide association studies indicate that the involvement
of BMP15 or GDF9 genetic variations in the etiology
of PCOS remains controversial (Takebayashi
; Gonzalez ; Liu ; Persani ).
Primary ovarian insufficiency
Several BMP15 gene mutations have been reported in primary ovarian
insufficiency (POI) patients with primary or secondary amenorrhea (Takebayashi ;
Di Pasquale , 2006; Chand ; Dixit ; Persani ;
Tiotiu ; Auclair ; Ferrarini ). The first missense mutation in the
BMP15 gene was identified in two Italian sisters with familial
ovarian dysgenesis and primary amenorrhea (Di
Pasquale ). Compared to the normal humanBMP15
protein, a recombinant BMP15 developed from this mutant gene fails to stimulate GC
growth activity and is unable to inhibit progesterone production in primary human GCs
(Auclair ). Like BMP15, several cohort studies involving different
populations with POI have been conducted to screen for GDF9 gene
mutations (Dixit ; Laissue ; Kovanci
; Wang ; Simpson ). However, various missense
mutations encoding different GDF9 mutant proteins may display contrasting results in
functional studies. Some variants significantly decrease mature GDF9 protein
production and diminish the ability of GDF9 to stimulate GC proliferation (Wang ). In
contrast, other variants may encode a mutant GDF9 that significantly increases GC
proliferation (Simpson ).
Endometriosis
Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine
cavity, which affects 10% of reproductive-aged women (Vigano ). Although many
theories have been proposed, the precise pathogenesis and molecular mechanism of this
common disease remain unknown (Bulun ). Immunohistochemical staining of endometriotic
lesions obtained from 85 patients revealed that BMP6 is strongly expressed in both
the epithelial and stromal cells (Athanasios
). A genome-wide profiling analysis
comparing the gene expression of ectopic and eutopic endometrial tissues showed that
BMP4 and its antagonist, GREM1, are dysregulated in endometriosis (Crispi ).
Future studies aimed at addressing the functional roles of BMPs in the development of
endometriosis will be of great interest.
Novel role of GDF8 in the human ovary
Originally identified in the musculoskeletal system, GDF8 is one of the members of the
TGF-β superfamily (McPherron ). GDF8 and BMP11 (GDF11) are two closely related growth
factors that share a similar structure and function (Gamer ). Also known as myostatin,
GDF8 is a potent inhibitor of skeletal muscle growth and development (McPherron ).
Mice carrying a targeted mutation of the Gdf8 gene have an
~25–30% increase in muscle mass because of muscle fiber hypertrophy and
hyperplasia (McPherron ). Naturally occurring GDF8 gene mutations leading to
increased muscle mass have been reported in several species, including cattle, sheep,
dogs and humans (McPherron and Lee, 1997;
Schuelke ;
Clop ;
Mosher ).
In the last few years, there has been a growing interest in the investigation of
GDF8’s functional roles outside of the musculoskeletal systems. Notably, the
expression and potential functions of GDF8 have recently been investigated in several
reproductive organs, including the uterus and placenta (Islam ; Peiris ). Furthermore, data from
clinical samples have highlighted the possible involvement of GDF8 in the pathogenesis
of certain reproductive disorders, such as uterine myoma, pre-eclampsia and PCOS (Chen ; Guo ; Islam ).
GDF8 and ovarian steroidogenesis
In chicken embryos, GDF8 is extensively expressed in various tissues, including the
gonads (testis and ovary) (Kubota ). In bovineovaries, microarray analysis revealed the
expression of GDF8 in the GCs of different sizes of antral follicles
(Skinner ). Our most recent immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that GDF8 and
its putative functional receptors (ACVR2A, ACVR2B and ALK5) are expressed in the GCs
of growing follicles in the human ovary (unpublished data). Moreover, the mature GDF8
protein is detectable in the follicular fluid obtained from IVFpatients (Chang ). In
addition, recent studies have identified a novel role for GDF8 in the regulation of
human GC steroidogenesis. Specifically, GDF8 regulates steroid production by
increasing aromatase/estradiol production while decreasing StAR/progesterone
production in primary hGL cells (Chang
). Analysis of the data from clinical
samples supports these findings, as there is a negative correlation between GDF8
concentrations and progesterone concentrations in the serum and follicular fluid
(Fang ,
2016b). Moreover, GDF8 may enhance
the FSH-induced aromatase/estradiol production, whereas GDF8 suppresses the
LH-induced StAR/progesterone production in hGL cells (Chang ). In this regard, GDF8
exerts a regulatory function by modulating GC responsiveness to gonadotrophins.
Notably, GDF8 enhances GC responsiveness to FSH by up-regulating FSH receptor (FSHR)
expression while suppressing GC responsiveness to LH by down-regulating LHR
expression (Chang ). In line with these results, our previous studies showed that
activins (activin A, B and AB) may act in a similar manner to modulate
steroidogenesis in the same cell model (Chang
). The downstream signaling pathway may
account for the similar cellular effects, as both GDF8 and activins act through
SMAD2/3-SMAD4-mediated target gene regulation in human GCs (Fang ; Chang ).
GDF8 and GC proliferation
During follicular development, GC proliferation and GC terminal differentiation are
the key processes essential for oocyte maturation, ovulation and luteinization (Baerwald ). At
the periovulatory stage, various regulatory endocrine and paracrine factors
meticulously modulate the functional switch of GCs from a highly proliferative status
to a non-proliferative, terminally differentiated status (McGee and Hsueh, 2000). Beyond its role in regulating
steroid production, an in vitro study showed that GDF8 suppresses
human GC proliferation (Chang ). This negative regulatory effect is mediated by
another growth factor, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), indicating that GDF8
and CTGF may be involved in the control of highly proliferative and non-proliferative
events during human follicular development (Chang ).
GDF8 and extracellular matrix formation
Lysyl oxidase (LOX) is the key enzyme for the final assembly and stabilization of the
extracellular matrix that is essential for follicle and oocyte maturation (Kagan and Trackman, 1991; Woodruff and Shea, 2007). In the rat
ovary, the LOX expression level is positively correlated with oocyte quality (Jiang ). In
many organs, CTGF is a principle mediator of extracellular matrix-related tissue
remodeling (Lipson ). Both CTGF and LOX are expressed in human GCs, and CTGF mediates the
GDF8-induced increase in LOX activity and LOX protein expression (Chang ).
Interestingly, the GDF8-induced up-regulation of CTGF expression in
human GCs occurs through the ALK5-mediated SMAD2/3-SMAD4 signaling pathway (Chang ). This
finding is inconsistent with a previous study demonstrating that GDF8 signaling is
mainly dependent on ALK4, but not ALK5, in mouseC2C12 myoblasts, indicating that the
type I receptor-mediated GDF8 downstream signaling is cell-type specific (Kemaladewi ).
Specifically, GDF8 acts through ALK4 in myoblast cells, while ALK5 mediates the
GDF8-induced cellular action in non-myogenic cells.
GDF8 and COC expansion
The occurrence of COC and the extent of cumulus expansion have been linked to oocyte
competence and are potentially useful as indicators for oocyte selection in the IVF
program (Ball ; Foote, 1987). The
combined results of the in vitro studies and the clinical data also
revealed a positive correlation between PTX3 expression levels in
cumulus cells and their corresponding oocyte quality and subsequent fertilization
rates (Zhang ; Huang ). Consistent with the effects of BMP4 and BMP7, GDF8 might modulate
cumulus expansion by down-regulating the key linking protein, PTX3, in human GCs
(Chang ).Taken together, GDF8 is expressed in human GCs, and its mature proteins are
detectable in follicular fluid. A series of functional studies have demonstrated the
roles of GDF8 in regulating steroidogenesis, gonadotrophin responsiveness, cell
proliferation, LOX expression, LOX activity and
PTX3 expression in human GCs (Fig. 3). These findings suggest that this unique TGF-β
superfamily member might play a critical role in modulation of the final
differentiation processes in the growing follicles, most likely by acting as both a
maturation stimulator and a luteinization inhibitor.
Figure 3
Schematic diagram summarizing potential roles of GDF8 in a human growing
follicle. In this follicular microenvironment, the locally produced GDF8 may
promote aromatase/estradiol and FSHR expression, suppress StAR/progesterone
and LHR expression and down-regulate PTX3 expression. In addition, GDF8
induces the expression of CTGF, which contributes to the suppression of GC
proliferation and the increase in LOX activity. 3βHSD,
3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; CTGF, connective tissue growth
factor; ECM, extracellular matrix; LOX, lysyl oxidase; P450scc, P450
side-chain cleavage enzyme; PTX3, pentraxin 3; FSHR, FSH receptor; LHR, LH
receptor.
Schematic diagram summarizing potential roles of GDF8 in a human growing
follicle. In this follicular microenvironment, the locally produced GDF8 may
promote aromatase/estradiol and FSHR expression, suppress StAR/progesterone
and LHR expression and down-regulate PTX3 expression. In addition, GDF8
induces the expression of CTGF, which contributes to the suppression of GC
proliferation and the increase in LOX activity. 3βHSD,
3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; CTGF, connective tissue growth
factor; ECM, extracellular matrix; LOX, lysyl oxidase; P450scc, P450
side-chain cleavage enzyme; PTX3, pentraxin 3; FSHR, FSH receptor; LHR, LH
receptor.
Perspectives and therapeutic potential
A more comprehensive understanding of the physiological roles of BMPs/GDFs in the human
ovary will provide significant insights into ovarian pathology and lead to new methods
of approaching fertility regulation, whether the goal is to develop alternative forms of
contraception, to diagnose and treat humaninfertility, or to develop safer and reliable
protocols of inducing ovulation in ART. The involvement of BMP/GDF signaling pathways in
a wide range of developmental and pathophysiological processes of reproductive biology
makes targeting these pathways a potential therapeutic approach to overcome female
infertility. At present, several recombinant human BMPs/GDFs and their inhibitors or
antagonists have undergone clinical trials or have received US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) approval in human skeletal and muscular systems (Gautschi ; Kinouchi ; Lissenberg-Thunnissen ; Smith and Lin, 2013; Lee and Wikesjo, 2014; Schmidt-Bleek ). Furthermore,
the latest development of gene therapy and BMP-ligand trapping approaches are currently
attracting more attention (Kinouchi ; Hawinkels
; Sherman ; Spiekerkoetter ). All of the above information
clearly reflects the availability of potential new medications acting on the BMP/GDF
pathways for the treatment of a variety of human diseases, including female reproductive
pathologies. However, further humanclinical trials are warranted to investigate the
efficacy, safety and administration routes of these pharmaceutical applications.
Conclusion
In the last decade, research regarding locally produced growth factors and
intra-follicular signaling between the oocyte and the follicle cells has been of
considerable interest. The accumulated data indicate that the intra-ovarian BMP/GDF
system is of great importance in controlling female reproduction, including PGC
development, cell–cell communication, steroidogenesis, COC formation and
expansion, oocyte maturation, ovulation and luteolysis. Thus, the relationship between
the oocyte and its supporting cells (GCs and theca/stroma cells) should be regarded as a
synchronous partnership. During follicular development, all of these cell types play
essential, yet sometimes distinct, roles in regulating ovarian functions to generate a
competent oocyte for embryo development. A comprehensive understanding of the
expression, actions and underlying molecular mechanisms of the BMP/GDF system in the
human ovary is critical to the development of clinical approaches (diagnosis and/or
treatment) for women suffering from infertility and ovulation dysfunction.
Authors: Md Soriful Islam; William H Catherino; Olga Protic; Milijana Janjusevic; Peter Clarke Gray; Stefano Raffaele Giannubilo; Andrea Ciavattini; Pasquale Lamanna; Andrea Luigi Tranquilli; Felice Petraglia; Mario Castellucci; Pasquapina Ciarmela Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Alisha Holtzhausen; Christelle Golzio; Tam How; Yong-Hun Lee; William P Schiemann; Nicholas Katsanis; Gerard C Blobe Journal: FASEB J Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Caterina Clementi; Swamy K Tripurani; Michael J Large; Mark A Edson; Chad J Creighton; Shannon M Hawkins; Ertug Kovanci; Vesa Kaartinen; John P Lydon; Stephanie A Pangas; Francesco J DeMayo; Martin M Matzuk Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: V Praveen Chakravarthi; Subhra Ghosh; Sami M Housami; Huizhen Wang; Katherine F Roby; Michael W Wolfe; William H Kinsey; M A Karim Rumi Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2021-02-13 Impact factor: 4.102