Literature DB >> 27797557

Cognitive predictors of a common multitasking ability: Contributions from working memory, attention control, and fluid intelligence.

Thomas S Redick1, Zach Shipstead2, Matthew E Meier3, Janelle J Montroy4, Kenny L Hicks5, Nash Unsworth6, Michael J Kane7, D Zachary Hambrick8, Randall W Engle5.   

Abstract

Previous research has identified several cognitive abilities that are important for multitasking, but few studies have attempted to measure a general multitasking ability using a diverse set of multitasks. In the final dataset, 534 young adult subjects completed measures of working memory (WM), attention control, fluid intelligence, and multitasking. Correlations, hierarchical regression analyses, confirmatory factor analyses, structural equation models, and relative weight analyses revealed several key findings. First, although the complex tasks used to assess multitasking differed greatly in their task characteristics and demands, a coherent construct specific to multitasking ability was identified. Second, the cognitive ability predictors accounted for substantial variance in the general multitasking construct, with WM and fluid intelligence accounting for the most multitasking variance compared to attention control. Third, the magnitude of the relationships among the cognitive abilities and multitasking varied as a function of the complexity and structure of the various multitasks assessed. Finally, structural equation models based on a multifaceted model of WM indicated that attention control and capacity fully mediated the WM and multitasking relationship. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27797557     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  15 in total

1.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2019-03-29

3.  Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment.

Authors:  Victor Mittelstädt; Jeff Miller; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

4.  The Influence of Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability on Working Memory Training Gains.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick; Alexandra B Morrison
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2018-11-16

5.  The visual arrays task: Visual storage capacity or attention control?

Authors:  Jessie D Martin; Jason S Tsukahara; Christopher Draheim; Zach Shipstead; Cody A Mashburn; Edward K Vogel; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-09-30

6.  The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

7.  The role of working memory capacity in spatial learning depends on spatial information integration difficulty in the environment.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Andrew T Han; Tanya A Churaman; Thackery I Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-09-14

8.  Time takes space: selective effects of multitasking on concurrent spatial processing.

Authors:  Timo Mäntylä; Valentina Coni; Veit Kubik; Ivo Todorov; Fabio Del Missier
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-03-18

9.  Attentional disengagements in educational contexts: a diary investigation of everyday mind-wandering and distraction.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Brittany D McMillan
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-08-23

10.  Spatial ability contributes to memory for delayed intentions.

Authors:  Veit Kubik; Fabio Del Missier; Timo Mäntylä
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.