Literature DB >> 34591545

The visual arrays task: Visual storage capacity or attention control?

Jessie D Martin1, Jason S Tsukahara2, Christopher Draheim2, Zach Shipstead3, Cody A Mashburn2, Edward K Vogel3, Randall W Engle2.   

Abstract

Extant literature suggests that performance on visual arrays tasks reflects limited-capacity storage of visual information. However, there is also evidence to suggest that visual arrays task performance reflects individual differences in controlled processing. The purpose of this study is to empirically evaluate the degree to which visual arrays tasks are more closely related to memory storage capacity or measures of attention control. To this end, we conducted new analyses on a series of large data sets that incorporate various versions of a visual arrays task. Based on these analyses, we suggest that the degree to which the visual arrays is related to memory storage ability or effortful attention control may be task-dependent. Specifically, when versions of the task require participants to ignore elements of the target display, individual differences in controlled attention reliably provide unique predictive value. Therefore, at least some versions of the visual arrays tasks can be used as valid indicators of individual differences in attention control. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34591545      PMCID: PMC9045334          DOI: 10.1037/xge0001048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  59 in total

1.  Combining Reaction Time and Accuracy: The Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Task Switching as a Case Example.

Authors:  Christopher Draheim; Kenny L Hicks; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-01

2.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.

Authors:  Doris Keye; Oliver Wilhelm; Klaus Oberauer; Don van Ravenzwaaij
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

4.  The role of maintenance and disengagement in predicting reading comprehension and vocabulary learning.

Authors:  Jessie D Martin; Zach Shipstead; Tyler L Harrison; Thomas S Redick; Michael Bunting; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Working Memory Capacity and Fluid Intelligence: Maintenance and Disengagement.

Authors:  Zach Shipstead; Tyler L Harrison; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-11

6.  The domain-specific and domain-general relationships of visuospatial working memory to reasoning ability.

Authors:  Zach Shipstead; Jade Yonehiro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

Review 7.  Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  More Is Less: Increased Processing of Unwanted Memories Facilitates Forgetting.

Authors:  Tracy H Wang; Katerina Placek; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Diffusion modeling and intelligence: Drift rates show both domain-general and domain-specific relations with intelligence.

Authors:  Veronika Lerche; Mischa von Krause; Andreas Voss; Gidon T Frischkorn; Anna-Lena Schubert; Dirk Hagemann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-05-07

10.  Attention control: The missing link between sensory discrimination and intelligence.

Authors:  Jason S Tsukahara; Tyler L Harrison; Christopher Draheim; Jessie D Martin; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.