Literature DB >> 27796608

Reconstruction of tooth-bearing portion of mandible using polyglactin 910 sutures for internal fixation in the third-world: functional and cosmetic outcome.

Bayo Aluko-Olokun1, Ademola A Olaitan2, Oluseun A Aluko-Olokun2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the cosmetic and functional outcome of cases involving reconstruction of tooth-bearing portion of the lower jaw, using a polyglactin 910 suture for fixation. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: This prospective intervention study documented the treatment outcome in 25 consecutive adult patients, who underwent immediate mandibular reconstruction following segmental resection of tooth-bearing portion of mandible. Cortico-cancellous bone graft was taken from the inner table of iliac bone, sparing the crest. Use of post-surgical inter-maxillary fixation was avoided.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were recruited for the study. Seventeen were males and eight were females. Their ages ranged from 18 to 50 years, with a mean of 30.0 years. Average length of grafted bone was 9.8 cm. Following surgery, all 25 (100%) patients were judged to have satisfactory facial symmetry. One (4.0 %) had altered dental occlusion. Twenty-five (100%) had satisfactory bone union. All of the patients claimed to masticate satisfactorily. Assessment was carried out at the last post-operative follow-up visit for each patient who ranged between 22 and 83 months.
CONCLUSION: Use of polyglactin 910 suture material for fixation in mandibular reconstruction following segmental resection of tooth-bearing portion has proven to be a cosmetic and functional success. It may serve as alternative for those among whom conventional treatment methods may be contraindicated. This method of bone fixation may serve as a reliable and much cheaper alternative in low-income countries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fixation; Mandibular; Polyglactin 910; Reconstruction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27796608     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-016-0589-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  19 in total

Review 1.  The ameloblastoma: primary, curative surgical management.

Authors:  Eric R Carlson; Robert E Marx
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline.

Authors:  Ingo N Springer; Bjorn Wannicke; Patrick H Warnke; Oliver Zernial; Jorg Wiltfang; Paul A J Russo; Hendrik Terheyden; Andreas Reinhardt; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 3.  Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review.

Authors:  Bee Tin Goh; Shermin Lee; Henk Tideman; Paul J W Stoelinga
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Complications of miniplate osteosynthesis for mandibular fractures.

Authors:  S Nakamura; Y Takenoshita; M Oka
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: an outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success.

Authors:  R D Foster; J P Anthony; A Sharma; M A Pogrel
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 6.  Removal of bicortical screws and other osteosynthesis material that caused symptoms after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a retrospective study of 251 patients, and review of published papers.

Authors:  Jop P Verweij; Pascal N W J Houppermans; Gertjan Mensink; J P Richard van Merkesteyn
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  Is immediate reconstruction of the mandible with nonvascularized bone graft following resection of benign pathology a viable treatment option?

Authors:  Thomas Schlieve; William Hull; Michael Miloro; Antonia Kolokythas
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects.

Authors:  M A Pogrel; S Podlesh; J P Anthony; J Alexander
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Immediate reconstruction of a large mandibular defect of locally invasive benign lesions (a new method).

Authors:  Gholamreza Shirani; Mahnaz Arshad; Farnoush Mohammadi
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Comparison of donor-site engraftment after harvesting vascularized and nonvascularized iliac bone grafts.

Authors:  Alireza Ghassemi; Mehrangiz Ghassemi; Dieter Riediger; Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Marcus Gerressen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.