Literature DB >> 19615568

Comparison of donor-site engraftment after harvesting vascularized and nonvascularized iliac bone grafts.

Alireza Ghassemi1, Mehrangiz Ghassemi, Dieter Riediger, Ralf-Dieter Hilgers, Marcus Gerressen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to characterize the donor-site morbidity after harvesting of nonvascularized and vascularized iliac bone grafts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 353 patients were collected for analysis. In addition, a questionnaire was sent to all patients asking about their perceptions of different parameters. In an individual age-matched layout, we compared 34 patients with nonvascularized iliac bone grafts with 34 patients with vascularized iliac bone grafts.
RESULTS: Transplantation of vascularized bone grafts has been increasingly performed at our institution. The mean age was 41.5 years in the nonvascularized group and 48.6 years in the vascularized group. The main reason for the bony defect in the vascularized group was malignancy. The majority of postoperative functional problems were observed in obese patients. No patient had serious or long-term complications at the donor site. The amount of bone graft taken affected postoperative sensitivity disturbance and caused postoperative functional problems and pain.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the iliac crest is a suitable site for harvesting both vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts measuring up to 10 x 3 cm. For larger defects that require a larger bone graft, a vascularized bone graft is more suitable with a better predictable healing capability. No significant differences in donor-site morbidity were found between the vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts if a similar amount of bone was taken for transplant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19615568     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  9 in total

1.  Nonvascularized Bone Graft Reconstruction of the Irradiated Murine Mandible: An Analogue of Clinical Head and Neck Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Kevin M Urlaub; Russell E Ettinger; Noah S Nelson; Jessie M Hoxie; Alicia E Snider; Joseph E Perosky; Yekaterina Polyatskaya; Alexis Donneys; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Reconstruction of tooth-bearing portion of mandible using polyglactin 910 sutures for internal fixation in the third-world: functional and cosmetic outcome.

Authors:  Bayo Aluko-Olokun; Ademola A Olaitan; Oluseun A Aluko-Olokun
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-10-29

3.  Non-vascularised iliac crest bone graft for immediate reconstruction of lateral mandibular defect.

Authors:  Eyituoyo Okoturo
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-10-10

4.  [Relationship between prognosis and different surgical treatments of zygomatic defects: A retrospective study].

Authors:  L Lan; Y He; J G An; Y Zhang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-04-18

5.  Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Nassim Ayoub; Alireza Ghassemi; Majeed Rana; Marcus Gerressen; Dieter Riediger; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Accuracy of using computer-aided rapid prototyping templates for mandible reconstruction with an iliac crest graft.

Authors:  Da-long Shu; Xiang-zhen Liu; Bing Guo; Wei Ran; Xin Liao; Yun-yan Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 7.  Comparing the use of conventional and three-dimensional printing (3DP) in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Ailis Truscott; Reza Zamani; Mohammad Akrami
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Indications of Free Grafts in Mandibular Reconstruction, after Removing Benign Tumors: Treatment Algorithm.

Authors:  Rodrigo Fariña; Juan Pablo Alister; Francisca Uribe; Sergio Olate; Alvaro Arriagada
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-15

Review 9.  Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Surgery in Maxillary Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gustaaf J C van Baar; Kitty Schipper; Tymour Forouzanfar; Lars Leeuwrik; Henri A H Winters; Angela Ridwan-Pramana; Frank K J Leusink
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.