Literature DB >> 27796574

Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results.

Claudio Cacaci1, Friederike Cantner1, Thomas Mücke2, Peter Randelzhofer1, Jan Hajtó3, Florian Beuer4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate the clinical performance of implant-supported zirconia crowns with a sintered veneering cap. Furthermore, the influence of the type of retention (screw-retained vs cemented single crowns) was analysed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were accommodated with 114 implants, inserted in the molar and premolar regions. Zirconia-based crowns with a sintered veneering cap were either screw-retained (n = 53) or cemented (n = 61) on the implant. Recalls were performed every 6 months. The state of soft tissue was documented by the modified plaque and gingiva index (mPI) and sulcus bleeding index (mSBI). The restorations were evaluated for technical failures like veneering porcelain fractures, surface qualities and marginal fitting.
RESULTS: Neither implant loss nor crown fractures occurred. After a mean clinical service time of 36.9 months, fractures of the veneering porcelain were registered in 1.8 % of the cases. The Kaplan-Meier survival probability regarding eventless restorations was 98.2 %. Chipping of the veneering porcelain was registered in two cemented crowns without statistical influence of the type of retention. The indices showed healthy soft periimplant tissues in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Implant-supported zirconia crowns with a sintered veneering cap demonstrated good clinical performance. The type of retention had no influence on technical complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cementation; Implant-supported crown; Implat; Screw retention; Single crown

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27796574     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1982-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  51 in total

1.  Soft tissue management in oral implantology: a review of surgical techniques for shaping an esthetic and functional peri-implant soft tissue structure.

Authors:  F Khoury; A Happe; A Hoppe
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.677

2.  Precision of a CAD/CAM technique for the production of zirconium dioxide copings.

Authors:  Pierluigi Coli; Stig Karlsson
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study.

Authors:  P Vult von Steyern; P Carlson; K Nilner
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Screw versus cemented implant supported restorations.

Authors:  W Chee; S Jivraj
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results.

Authors:  Joachim Tinschert; Karen A Schulze; Gerd Natt; Peter Latzke; Nicole Heussen; Hubertus Spiekermann
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 6.  All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).

Authors:  Irena Sailer; Nikolay Alexandrovich Makarov; Daniel Stefan Thoma; Marcel Zwahlen; Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Platform switching and abutment emergence profile modification on peri-implant soft tissue.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Dornbush; Gary M Reiser; Daniel K Ho
Journal:  Alpha Omegan       Date:  2014

Review 8.  Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review.

Authors:  Keisuke Nakamura; Taro Kanno; Percy Milleding; Ulf Ortengren
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

9.  A prospective study of implant-supported full-arch yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal mandibular fixed dental prostheses: three-year results.

Authors:  Christel Larsson; Per Vult von Steyern; Krister Nilner
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 10.  Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).

Authors:  Bjarni E Pjetursson; Urs Brägger; Niklaus P Lang; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  7 in total

1.  Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.

Authors:  Matthias Obermeier; Oliver Ristow; Kurt Erdelt; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  One-time versus repeated abutment connection for platform-switched implant: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing-Qing Wang; Ruoxi Dai; Chris Ying Cao; Hui Fang; Min Han; Quan-Li Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson; Irena Sailer; Andrey Latyshev; Kerstin Rabel; Ralf-Joachim Kohal; Duygu Karasan
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 5.021

4.  A 5-year randomized controlled trial comparing zirconia-based versus metal-based implant-supported single-tooth restorations in the premolar region.

Authors:  Mandana Hosseini; Nils Worsaae; Klaus Gotfredsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 5.021

5.  In vitro performance and fracture resistance of novel CAD/CAM ceramic molar crowns loaded on implants and human teeth.

Authors:  Verena Preis; Sebastian Hahnel; Michael Behr; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part II: Soft Tissues.

Authors:  Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Naia Bustamante-Hernández; Carlos Labaig-Rueda; Antonio Fons-Font; Lucía Fernández-Estevan; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues.

Authors:  Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Naia Bustamante-Hernández; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Antonio Fons-Font; Lucía Fernández-Estevan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.