Literature DB >> 27792474

Comparison of coarse coal dust sampling techniques in a laboratory-simulated longwall section.

Justin R Patts1, Teresa L Barone1.   

Abstract

Airborne coal dust generated during mining can deposit and accumulate on mine surfaces, presenting a dust explosion hazard. When assessing dust hazard mitigation strategies for airborne dust reduction, sampling is done in high-velocity ventilation air, which is used to purge the mining face and gallery tunnel. In this environment, the sampler inlet velocity should be matched to the air stream velocity (isokinetic sampling) to prevent oversampling of coarse dust at low sampler-to-air velocity ratios. Low velocity ratios are often encountered when using low flow rate, personal sampling pumps commonly used in underground mines. In this study, with a goal of employing mine-ready equipment, a personal sampler was adapted for area sampling of coarse coal dust in high-velocity ventilation air. This was done by adapting an isokinetic nozzle to the inlet of an Institute of Occupational Medicine (Edinburgh, Scotland) sampling cassette (IOM). Collected dust masses were compared for the modified IOM isokinetic sampler (IOM-MOD), the IOM without the isokinetic nozzle, and a conventional dust sampling cassette without the cyclone on the inlet. All samplers were operated at a flow rate typical of personal sampling pumps: 2 L/min. To ensure differences between collected masses that could be attributed to sampler design and were not influenced by artifacts from dust concentration gradients, relatively uniform and repeatable dust concentrations were demonstrated in the sampling zone of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health experimental mine gallery. Consistent with isokinetic theory, greater differences between isokinetic and non-isokinetic sampled masses were found for larger dust volume-size distributions and higher ventilation air velocities. Since isokinetic sampling is conventionally used to determine total dust concentration, and isokinetic sampling made a difference in collected masses, the results suggest when sampling for coarse coal dust the IOM-MOD may improve airborne coarse dust assessments over "off-the-shelf" sampling cassettes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerosol sampling methods; IOM sampler; coal dust; float dust; isokinetic; large particle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27792474      PMCID: PMC5556312          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1252844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  8 in total

1.  Personal sampling in parallel with open-face filter cassettes and IOM samplers for inhalable dust--implications for occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  G Lidén; B Melin; A Lidblom; K Lindberg; J O Norén
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2000-03

2.  A rotating bluff-body disc for reduced variability in wind tunnel aerosol studies.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; T Renee Anthony; Michael van Dyke; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-11-22

3.  The use of dust-collecting cassettes in dust samplers.

Authors:  D Mark
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1990-06

4.  A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance.

Authors:  L C Kenny; R Aitken; C Chalmers; J F Fabriès; E Gonzalez-Fernandez; H Kromhout; G Lidén; D Mark; G Riediger; V Prodi
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1997-04

5.  A new personal sampler for airborne total dust in workplaces.

Authors:  D Mark; J H Vincent
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1986

6.  A higher-flow rate cyclone for determination of respirable dust.

Authors:  J R Cossey; N P Vaughan
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1987

7.  Reducing float coal dust: Field evaluation of an inline auxiliary fan scrubber.

Authors:  J R Patts; J F Colinet; S J Janisko; T L Barone; L D Patts
Journal:  Min Eng       Date:  2016-12

8.  Sampling and analysis method for measuring airborne coal dust mass in mixtures with limestone (rock) dust.

Authors:  T L Barone; J R Patts; S J Janisko; J F Colinet; L D Patts; T W Beck; S E Mischler
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.155

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the CAS-POL and IOM samplers for determining the knockdown efficiencies of water sprays on float coal dust.

Authors:  Clara E Seaman; Michael R Shahan; Timothy W Beck; Steven E Mischler
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.155

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.