Literature DB >> 27792408

The Quest for Spectacle Independence: A Comparison of Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implants and Pseudophakic Monovision for Patients with Presbyopia.

Steven Greenstein1, Roberto Pineda1.   

Abstract

We performed a literature review comparing multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with pseudophakic monovision to treat presbyopia. Multifocal IOLs utilize refractive or diffractive principles to treat both distance and near vision, with a single lens implant. Monovision uses traditional monofocal lens implants to treat the dominant eye for emmotropia, and the non-dominant eye for myopia. This planned anisometropia is designed to enhance intermediate or near vision. Generally, distance vision was similar with both types of lens implantation, near vision was better with multifocal IOLs, and intermediate vision appeared to be better in the monovision group. For patients requiring cataract surgery, both multifocal IOLs and monovision appear to address presbyopia with a high level of patient satisfaction. More patients reported complete spectacle independence with multifocal IOLs, but more glare and halos were reported by multifocal IOL patients as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mini-monovision; monovision; multifocal; presbyopia; spectacle independence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27792408     DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2016.1228400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0882-0538            Impact factor:   1.975


  15 in total

1.  Accuracy of eight intraocular lens power calculation formulas for segmented multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Liang-Ping Liu; Huan-Huan Cheng; Jian-Bing Li; Xiao-Tong Han; Yu Liu; Ming-Xing Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Premium Monovision versus Bilateral Myopic Monovision, Hybrid Monovision and Bilateral Trifocal Implantation: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Asli Perente; Panagiota Ntonti; Konstantinos Delibasis; Ioannis Fotiadis; Aristeidis Konstantinidis; Doukas Dardabounis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-04

3.  Comparative analysis of a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens that combines extended depth-of-focus and bifocal profiles with a standard monofocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Da Eun Shin; Hun Lee; Kyungmin Koh
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Evaluation of Visual and Subjective Outcomes with Mix-and-Match of Three One-Piece Tecnis Multifocal IOLs of Varying Add Powers.

Authors:  Steven J Dell
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-29

Review 5.  Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review.

Authors:  Veronica Vargas-Fragoso; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-13

6.  Pseudophakic mini-monovision: high patient satisfaction, reduced spectacle dependence, and low cost.

Authors:  Debora Goetz Goldberg; Michael H Goldberg; Riddhi Shah; Jane N Meagher; Haresh Ailani
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Psychophysical Tests Do Not Identify Ocular Dominance Consistently.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Eli Peli
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-04-29

8.  Spectacle Independence And Patient Satisfaction With Pseudophakic Mini-Monovision Using Aberration-Free Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Tarek Abdelrazek Hafez; Hany Ahmed Helaly
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-31

Review 9.  Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.

Authors:  Marie Joan Therese D Balgos; Veronica Vargas; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

10.  Presbyopia Treatment With Eye Drops: An Eight Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Giovanna Benozzi; Cristian Perez; Juliana Leiro; Sonia Facal; Betina Orman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.