Anthony J Anzalone1,2,3, Damond Blueitt1,2,3, Tami Case1,2,3, Tiffany McGuffin1,2,3, Kalyssa Pollard1,2,3, J Craig Garrison1,2,3, Margaret T Jones1,4, Robert Pavur1,5, Stephanie Turner1,2,3, Jonathan M Oliver1,2,3. 1. Sports Concussion Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA. 2. Texas Health Ben Hogan Sports Medicine Concussion Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA. 3. Texas Health Ben Hogan Sports Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas, USA. 4. School of Recreation, Health, and Tourism, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia, USA. 5. College of Business, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vestibular and ocular motor impairments are routinely reported in patients with sports-related concussion (SRC) and may result in delayed return to play (RTP). The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) assessment has been shown to be consistent and sensitive in identifying concussion when used as part of a comprehensive examination. To what extent these impairments or symptoms are associated with length of recovery is unknown. PURPOSE: To examine whether symptom provocation or clinical abnormality in specific domains of the VOMS results in protracted recovery (time from SRC to commencement of RTP protocol). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 167 patients (69 girls, 98 boys; mean ± SD age, 15 ± 2 years [range, 11-19 years]) presenting with SRC in 2014. During the initial visit, VOMS was performed in which symptom provocation or clinical abnormality (eg, unsmooth eye movements) was documented by use of a dichotomous scale (0 = not present, 1 = present). The VOMS used in this clinic consisted of smooth pursuits (SMO_PUR), horizontal and vertical saccades (HOR_SAC and VER_SAC), horizontal and vertical vestibular ocular reflex (HOR_VOR and VER_VOR), near point of convergence (NPC), and accommodation (ACCOM). Domains were also categorized into ocular motor (SMO_PUR, HOR_SAC, VER_SAC, NPC, ACCOM) and vestibular (HOR_VOR, VER_VOR). Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore the relationship between the domains and recovery. Alpha was set at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: Symptom provocation and/or clinical abnormality in all domains except NPC ( P = .107) and ACCOM ( P = .234) delayed recovery (domain, hazard ratio [95% CI]: SMO_PUR, 0.65 [0.47-0.90], P = .009; HOR_SAC, 0.68 [0.50-0.94], P = .018; VER_SAC, 0.55 [0.40-0.75], P < .001; HOR_VOR, 0.68 [0.49-0.94], P = .018; VER_VOR, 0.60 [0.44-0.83], P = .002). The lowest crude hazard ratio was for ocular motor category (0.45 [0.32-0.63], P < .001). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that symptom provocation/clinical abnormality associated with all domains except NPC and ACCOM can delay recovery after SRC in youth and adolescents. Thus, the VOMS not only may augment current diagnostic tools but also may serve as a predictor of recovery time in patients with SRC. The findings of this study may lead to more effective prognosis of concussion in youth and adolescents.
BACKGROUND: Vestibular and ocular motor impairments are routinely reported in patients with sports-related concussion (SRC) and may result in delayed return to play (RTP). The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) assessment has been shown to be consistent and sensitive in identifying concussion when used as part of a comprehensive examination. To what extent these impairments or symptoms are associated with length of recovery is unknown. PURPOSE: To examine whether symptom provocation or clinical abnormality in specific domains of the VOMS results in protracted recovery (time from SRC to commencement of RTP protocol). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 167 patients (69 girls, 98 boys; mean ± SD age, 15 ± 2 years [range, 11-19 years]) presenting with SRC in 2014. During the initial visit, VOMS was performed in which symptom provocation or clinical abnormality (eg, unsmooth eye movements) was documented by use of a dichotomous scale (0 = not present, 1 = present). The VOMS used in this clinic consisted of smooth pursuits (SMO_PUR), horizontal and vertical saccades (HOR_SAC and VER_SAC), horizontal and vertical vestibular ocular reflex (HOR_VOR and VER_VOR), near point of convergence (NPC), and accommodation (ACCOM). Domains were also categorized into ocular motor (SMO_PUR, HOR_SAC, VER_SAC, NPC, ACCOM) and vestibular (HOR_VOR, VER_VOR). Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore the relationship between the domains and recovery. Alpha was set at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: Symptom provocation and/or clinical abnormality in all domains except NPC ( P = .107) and ACCOM ( P = .234) delayed recovery (domain, hazard ratio [95% CI]: SMO_PUR, 0.65 [0.47-0.90], P = .009; HOR_SAC, 0.68 [0.50-0.94], P = .018; VER_SAC, 0.55 [0.40-0.75], P < .001; HOR_VOR, 0.68 [0.49-0.94], P = .018; VER_VOR, 0.60 [0.44-0.83], P = .002). The lowest crude hazard ratio was for ocular motor category (0.45 [0.32-0.63], P < .001). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that symptom provocation/clinical abnormality associated with all domains except NPC and ACCOM can delay recovery after SRC in youth and adolescents. Thus, the VOMS not only may augment current diagnostic tools but also may serve as a predictor of recovery time in patients with SRC. The findings of this study may lead to more effective prognosis of concussion in youth and adolescents.
Authors: Carolina P Quintana; Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Anne D Olson; Nicholas R Heebner; Matthew C Hoch Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Kelly Sarmiento; Gerard A Gioia; Michael W Kirkwood; Shari L Wade; Keith O Yeates Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Jennifer B Christy; Graham D Cochrane; Anwar Almutairi; Claudio Busettini; Mark W Swanson; Katherine K Weise Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Justine B Lawrence; Mohammad N Haider; John J Leddy; Andrea Hinds; Jeffery C Miecznikowski; Barry S Willer Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2018-12-22 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Nathan Ernst; Philip Schatz; Alicia M Trbovich; Kouros Emami; Shawn R Eagle; Anne Mucha; Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: R J Elbin; Anthony P Kontos; Alicia Sufrinko; Mallory McElroy; Katie Stephenson-Brown; Samantha Mohler; Nathan R D'Amico; Michael W Collins Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Andrew R Mayer; Christopher Wertz; Sephira G Ryman; Eileen P Storey; Grace Park; John Phillips; Andrew B Dodd; Scott Oglesbee; Richard Campbell; Ronald A Yeo; Benjamin Wasserott; Nicholas A Shaff; John J Leddy; Rebekah Mannix; Kristy B Arbogast; Timothy B Meier; Matthew F Grady; Christina L Master Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: R J Elbin; Alicia Sufrinko; Morgan N Anderson; Samantha Mohler; Philip Schatz; Tracey Covassin; Anne Mucha; Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.649