Literature DB >> 27788499

Assessment of Fosfomycin for Complicated or Multidrug-Resistant Urinary Tract Infections: Patient Characteristics and Outcomes.

Stephanie E Giancola1, Monica V Mahoney, Michael D Hogan, Brian R Raux, Christopher McCoy, Elizabeth B Hirsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacterial resistance among uropathogens is on the rise and has led to a decreased effectiveness of oral therapies. Fosfomycin tromethamine (fosfomycin) is indicated for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) and displays in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates; however, clinical data assessing fosfomycin for the treatment of complicated or MDR UTIs are limited.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of patients who received ≥1 dose of fosfomycin between January 2009 and September 2015 for treatment of a UTI. Patients were included if they had a positive urine culture and documented signs/symptoms of a UTI.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included; 44 (77.2%) had complicated UTIs, 36 (63.2%) had MDR UTIs, and a total of 23 (40.4%) patients had a UTI that was both complicated and MDR. The majority of patients were female (66.7%) and elderly (median age, 79 years). Overall, the most common pathogens isolated were Escherichia coli (n = 28), Enterococcus spp. (n = 22), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 8). Twenty-eight patients (49.1%) were clinically evaluable; the preponderance achieved clinical success (96.4%). Fifteen out of 20 (75%) patients with repeat urine cultures had a microbiological cure.
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study adds to the limited literature exploring alternative therapies for complicated and MDR UTIs with results providing additional evidence that fosfomycin may be an effective oral option.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27788499     DOI: 10.1159/000449422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemotherapy        ISSN: 0009-3157            Impact factor:   2.544


  9 in total

1.  Urinary tract infection and drug-resistant urinary tract infection after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection versus sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  Caroline G Elmer-Lyon; Judy A Streit; Elizabeth B Takacs; Patrick P Ten Eyck; Catherine S Bradley
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Efficacy and safety of oral fosfomycin for asymptomatic bacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients: Results from a Spanish multicenter cohort.

Authors:  María Ruiz-Ruigómez; Mario Fernández-Ruiz; José Tiago Silva; Elisa Vidal; Julia Origüen; Antonia Calvo-Cano; Enrique Luna-Huerta; Esperanza Merino; Domingo Hernández; Cristina Jironda-Gallegos; Rosa Escudero-Sánchez; Francesca Gioia; Antonio Moreno; Cristina Roca; Elisa Cordero; Darío Janeiro; Beatriz Sánchez-Sobrino; María Milagro Montero; Dolores Redondo; Francisco Javier Candel; Isabel Pérez-Flores; Carlos Armiñanzas; Claudia González-Rico; María Carmen Fariñas; Emilio Rodrigo; Belén Loeches; María O López-Oliva; Miguel Montejo; Ricardo Lauzurica; Juan Pablo Horcajada; Julio Pascual; Amado Andrés; José María Aguado; Francisco López-Medrano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Performance of Four Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Methods against an International Collection of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Smith; Hunter V Brigman; Jadyn C Anderson; Christopher L Emery; Tiffany E Bias; Phillip J Bergen; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Elizabeth B Hirsch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Oral Fosfomycin Treatment for Enterococcal Urinary Tract Infections in a Dynamic In Vitro Model.

Authors:  Iain J Abbott; Elke van Gorp; Aart van der Meijden; Rixt A Wijma; Joseph Meletiadis; Jason A Roberts; Johan W Mouton; Anton Y Peleg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Fosfomycin against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. from Urinary Tract Infections and the Influence of pH on Fosfomycin Activities.

Authors:  Nayara Helisandra Fedrigo; Josmar Mazucheli; James Albiero; Danielle Rosani Shinohara; Fernanda Gomes Lodi; Ana Cristina Dos Santos Machado; Sherwin K B Sy; Maria Cristina Bronharo Tognim
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Distribution of ExPEC Virulence Factors, bla CTX-M, fosA3, and mcr-1 in Escherichia coli Isolated From Commercialized Chicken Carcasses.

Authors:  Paula Signolfi Cyoia; Vanessa Lumi Koga; Erick Kenji Nishio; Sébastien Houle; Charles M Dozois; Kelly Cristina Tagliari de Brito; Benito Guimarães de Brito; Gerson Nakazato; Renata Katsuko Takayama Kobayashi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Oral and Intravenous Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Michael A Zhanel; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 8.  UroPathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) Infections: Virulence Factors, Bladder Responses, Antibiotic, and Non-antibiotic Antimicrobial Strategies.

Authors:  Maria E Terlizzi; Giorgio Gribaudo; Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBLs) infections: what have we learned until now?

Authors:  Zoi Dorothea Pana; Theoklis Zaoutis
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-08-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.