Literature DB >> 27787198

The influence of evidence volatility on choice, reaction time and confidence in a perceptual decision.

Ariel Zylberberg1,2, Christopher R Fetsch1,2, Michael N Shadlen1,2.   

Abstract

Many decisions are thought to arise via the accumulation of noisy evidence to a threshold or bound. In perception, the mechanism explains the effect of stimulus strength, characterized by signal-to-noise ratio, on decision speed, accuracy and confidence. It also makes intriguing predictions about the noise itself. An increase in noise should lead to faster decisions, reduced accuracy and, paradoxically, higher confidence. To test these predictions, we introduce a novel sensory manipulation that mimics the addition of unbiased noise to motion-selective regions of visual cortex, which we verified with neuronal recordings from macaque areas MT/MST. For both humans and monkeys, increasing the noise induced faster decisions and greater confidence over a range of stimuli for which accuracy was minimally impaired. The magnitude of the effects was in agreement with predictions of a bounded evidence accumulation model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bounded evidence accumulation models; decision making; evidence reliability; human; neuroscience; perceptual decisions; rhesus macaque

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27787198      PMCID: PMC5083065          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.17688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  52 in total

1.  Correlated firing in macaque visual area MT: time scales and relationship to behavior.

Authors:  W Bair; E Zohary; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A stochastic model for individual choice behavior.

Authors:  R J AUDLEY
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The cost of accumulating evidence in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Jan Drugowitsch; Rubén Moreno-Bote; Anne K Churchland; Michael N Shadlen; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual cortex neurons in monkeys and cats: detection, discrimination, and identification.

Authors:  W S Geisler; D G Albrecht
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Dissociation of neuronal and psychophysical responses to local and global motion.

Authors:  James H Hedges; Yevgeniya Gartshteyn; Adam Kohn; Nicole C Rust; Michael N Shadlen; William T Newsome; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  A detailed comparison of optimality and simplicity in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Shan Shen; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; J A Movshon; A F Dean
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability.

Authors:  Sophie Deneve
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task.

Authors:  Timothy D Hanks; Jochen Ditterich; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  35 in total

1.  Confidence predicts speed-accuracy tradeoff for subsequent decisions.

Authors:  Kobe Desender; Annika Boldt; Tom Verguts; Tobias H Donner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Confluence of Timing and Reward Biases in Perceptual Decision-Making Dynamics.

Authors:  Maxwell Shinn; Daniel B Ehrlich; Daeyeol Lee; John D Murray; Hyojung Seo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The Magnitude, But Not the Sign, of MT Single-Trial Spike-Time Correlations Predicts Motion Detection Performance.

Authors:  Alireza Hashemi; Ashkan Golzar; Jackson E T Smith; Erik P Cook
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Superior colliculus neuronal ensemble activity signals optimal rather than subjective confidence.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; Piercesare Grimaldi; Seong Hah Cho; Megan A K Peters; Hakwan Lau; Michele A Basso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Response-Related Signals Increase Confidence But Not Metacognitive Performance.

Authors:  Elisa Filevich; Christina Koß; Nathan Faivre
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-05-20

6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation to visual cortex induces suboptimal introspection.

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Jeremy Fesi; Namema Amendi; Jeffrey D Knotts; Hakwan Lau; Tony Ro
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  The effect of abstract representation and response feedback on serial dependence in numerosity perception.

Authors:  Michele Fornaciai; Joonkoo Park
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Differentiating between integration and non-integration strategies in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Gabriel M Stine; Ariel Zylberberg; Jochen Ditterich; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Implicit Neurofeedback Training of Feature-Based Attention Promotes Biased Sensory Processing during Integrative Decision-Making.

Authors:  Angela I Renton; David R Painter; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.