| Literature DB >> 27783700 |
Jianchun Wan1,2, Songyou Hu2, Kefeng Ni2, Guifang Chang2, Xiangjun Sun1, Liangli Yu3.
Abstract
The structure of dietary triacylglycerols is thought to influence fatty acid and calcium absorption, as well as intestinal microbiota population of the host. In the present study, we investigated the impact of palmitic acid (PA) esterified at the sn-2 position on absorption of fatty acid and calcium and composition of intestinal microorganisms in rats fed high-fat diets containing either low sn-2 PA (12.1%), medium sn-2 PA (40.4%) or high sn-2 PA (56.3%), respectively. Fecal fatty acid profiles in the soaps were measured by gas chromatography (GC), while fecal calcium concentration was detected by ICP-MS. The fecal microbial composition was assessed using a 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing technology and fecal short-chain fatty acids were detected by ion chromatograph. Dietary supplementation with a high sn-2 PA fat significantly reduced total fecal contents of fatty acids soap and calcium compared with the medium or low sn-2 PA fat groups. Diet supplementation with sn-2 PA fat did not change the entire profile of the gut microbiota community at phylum level and the difference at genera level also were minimal in the three treatment groups. However, high sn-2 PA fat diet could potentially improve total short-chain fatty acids content in the feces, suggesting that high dietary sn-2 PA fat might have a beneficial effect on host intestinal health.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27783700 PMCID: PMC5082633 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164894
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fatty acids content in the chow diet and fatty acids distribution in triacylglycerols of fats in animal feeds.
| Fatty acids | Low | Medium | High | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mmol/100g diet | Total (mol% | mmol/100g diet | Total (mol%) | mmol/100g diet | total (mol%) | |||||||
| C12:0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| C14:0 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 0.9 |
| C16:0 | 20.8 | 37.5 | 13.6 | 49.4 | 20.5 | 36.9 | 44.7 | 33.0 | 20.4 | 36.7 | 62.0 | 24.3 |
| C18:0 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 6.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 6.5 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 6.5 | 1.5 |
| C18:1 | 23.7 | 42.7 | 56.7 | 35.7 | 25.8 | 46.0 | 36.3 | 51.6 | 26.7 | 48.1 | 23.6 | 60.4 |
| C18:1-trans | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| C18:2 | 7.2 | 13.0 | 20.8 | 9.1 | 5.3 | 9.6 | 8.8 | 10.0 | 4.5 | 8.2 | 3.5 | 10.5 |
| C18:2-trans | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| C20:0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| C16:0 esterified in | 12.1 | 40.4 | 56.3 | |||||||||
1)Fatty acids with lower concentration (<0.10%) are not listed above.
2)The percentage C16:0 esterified in sn-2 position is calculated by [(sn-2 C16:0 (mol %)) / (3×totalC16:0 (mol %)) ] × 100.
3)The percentage fatty acid esterified in sn-1, 3 position is calculated by sn-1, 3 (mol %) = [3 × total (mol %)—sn-2 (mol %)] /2.
4)Mol % indicates molar fraction percentage.
Feed intake and growth during the 4-week experimental period.
| Low | Medium | High | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food intake (g/3d per rat) | 16.9 ± 1.1 | 16.2 ± 0.6 | 17.7±1.2 | 0.28 |
| Initial body weight (g) | 98.6 ± 7.8 | 93.6 ± 6.6 | 94.1 ± 5.4 | 0.15 |
| Finial body weight (g) | 285 ± 39.3 | 280 ± 40.5 | 257 ± 52.5 | 0.26 |
| Dry weight stool (g/3d) | 4.29 ± 0.45 | 3.83 ± 0.35 | 3.96 ± 0.56 | 0.06 |
| Epididymal fat (g) | 1.86 ± 0.47 | 1.80 ± 0.35 | 1.69 ± 0.24 | 0.54 |
| Perirenal fat (g) | 1.80 ± 0.49 | 1.75 ± 0.30 | 1.61 ± 0.44 | 0.52 |
The results are the mean ± SD of 12 animals per group. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Three days fat intake, fecal fat excretion and absorption.
| Low | Medium | High | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fat intake | 9.2 ± 0.8 | 9.5 ± 0.7 | 9.4 ± 0.4 | 0.33 |
| Energy intake | 301 ± 27 | 311 ± 24 | 307 ± 12 | 0.33 |
| Total fecal fatty acid | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.05 | < 0.0001 |
| Energy loss | 20.6 ± 2.2 | 10.7 ± 1.6 | 2.9 ± 0.5 | < 0.0001 |
| Non-soap fatty acids(mmol/3d) | 0.26± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | < 0.0001 |
| Soap fatty acids | ||||
| C16:0 (mmol/3d) | 1.54± 0.17 | 0.61 ± 0.1 | 0.14 ± 0.05 | < 0.0001 |
| C18:0 (mmol/3d) | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | < 0.0001 |
| C18:1 (mmol/3d) | 0.11 ± 0.1 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | < 0.0001 |
| C18:2 (mmol/3d) | 0.02 ± 0.002 | 0.01 ± 0.002 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | < 0.0001 |
| Total soap fatty acids | 1.81 ± 0.19 | 0.80 ± 0.11 | 0.22 ± 0.06 | < 0.0001 |
The results are the mean ± SD of 12 animals per group.
a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test).
1) Fat intake = fat intake (g)/ (885.4g/mol), 885.4 is triacylglycerol molecular weight.
2) Energy intake (kJ/3d) is calculated based on fat intake. Energy: fat (37kJ/g).
3) Total fecal fatty acid is the sum content of soap fatty acid and non-soap fatty acid in the feces.
4) Energy loss is the fat energy losses in stool which calculated according to total fecal fatty acids. Energy: Fatty acid (37kJ/g).
5) Total soap fatty acids is the sum of C16:0, C18:0, C18:1 and C18:2 content.
Three days calcium intake, fecal calcium excretion and apparent absorption.
| Group | Calcium intake(mmol/3d) | Fecal calcium excretion(mmol/3d) | Apparent absorption | Apparent absorption rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 6.25 ± 0.56 | 3.58 ± 0.41 | 2.65 ± 0.44 | 42.6 ± 5.3 |
| Medium | 6.45 ± 0.50 | 3.03 ± 0.33 | 3.43 ± 0.61 | 53.8 ± 6.8 |
| High | 6.35 ± 0.24 | 2.48 ± 0.44 | 3.88 ± 0.44 | 61.0 ± 6.8 |
| 0.54 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
The results are the mean ± SD of 12 animals per group.
a,b,c Mean values within a column with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0.05; ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
1) Apparent absorption (mmol) = Calcium intake (mmol)–fecal Calcium excretion (mmol)
2) Apparent absorption rate (%) = [Apparent absorption (mmol)/Intake (mmol)] ×100
Richness and diversity indexes relative to each fecal sample (OTU cutoff of 0.03).
| Group | Reads | OTUs | Alpha diversity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACE | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson | |||
| Low | 31462 ± 5022 | 485 ± 80 | 541.5 ± 78.8 | 546.5 ± 73.8 | 4.39 ± 0.47 | 0.034 ± 0.016 |
| Medium | 33490 ± 3656 | 499 ± 43 | 556.0 ± 31.7 | 559.5 ± 33.4 | 4.42 ± 0.24 | 0.029 ± 0.008 |
| High | 30494 ± 6201 | 486 ± 48 | 552.5 ± 42.0 | 557.5 ± 44.4 | 4.33 ± 0.48 | 0.039 ± 0.026 |
| 0.49 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.89 | |
The results are the mean ± SD of 8 animals per group. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Fig 1Principal coordinate analysis using Bray-Curtis distance (n = 8).
The sample labels with letter and numeric A1-A8, B1-B8 and C1-C8 correspond to the eight random sample in the rats fed with low sn-2 PA fat, medium sn-2 PA fat and high sn-2 PA fat diets, respectively.
Fig 2Venn diagram showing the unique and shared OTUs (3% distance level).
The sample labels with letter A, B and C correspond to the rats fed low sn-2 PA fat, medium sn-2 PA fat and high sn-2 PA fat diets, respectively.
Fig 3Fecal bacterial population at the genus level (n = 8).
Relative abundance of different bacterial genus within the different communities. Sequences that could not be classified into any known group were assigned as ‘Unclassified bacteria’ and ‘No_Rank’. The ones with an abundance less than 1% in the phyla and genera were combined as “others”. The sample labels with letter and numeric A1-A8, B1-B8 and C1-C8 correspond to the eight random sample in the rats fed with low sn-2 PA fat, medium sn-2 PA fat and high sn-2 PA fat diets, respectively.
Fecal content of SCFA in rats (μmol/g).
| Low | Medium | High | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetic acid | 22.1 ± 1.9 | 23.5 ± 4.7 | 30.2 ± 2.7 | < 0.0001 |
| Propionic acid | 5.5 ± 1.8 | 4.8 ± 0.7 | 5.9 ± 1.2 | 0.28 |
| Butyric acid | 2.3 ± 0.6 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 0.01 |
| Total SCFA | 29.8 ± 2.8 | 30.9 ± 4.6 | 39.5 ± 3.1 | < 0.0001 |
The results are the mean ± SD of 12 animals per group.
a,bMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0.05; ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
1) Total SCFA is sum of acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid.