Literature DB >> 27781181

Perioperative Complications of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy.

Michael D Daubs1, Darrel S Brodke2, Prokopis Annis2, Brandon D Lawrence2.   

Abstract

Study Design Retrospective case series. Objective To describe the perioperative complications (0 to 90 days) associated with pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs) performed at a tertiary spine center by two experienced spine surgeons who recently adopted the technique. Methods We reviewed all 65 patients (47 women and 18 men; mean age 60 years, range 24 to 80) who underwent a PSO at our institution. Descriptive data and analysis of complications were limited to the perioperative time (within 90 days of surgery). Data analyzed included operative time, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), blood products, comorbidities, neurologic complications, and medical complications. Complications were rated as major and minor. Radiographic data was also analyzed. Results Ten patients (15.4%) had a major complication, and 15 (23%) had a minor complication. There were three perioperative deaths. The most common major complication was neurologic deficit (6.2%, 4/65), three with a permanent foot drop, and one with paraplegia secondary to postoperative hematoma. There were no differences between patients with and without a major complication in regard to age, gender, comorbidities, operative time, number of levels fused, and EBL (p > 0.05). Patients with a major complication had a longer intensive care unit stay (p = 0.04). There was no difference in the rate of major complications between the initial and later cases performed. Conclusion The major complication rate for pedicle subtraction osteotomy was 15% and the minor complication rate was 23%. The most common major complication was neurologic deficit in 6.2%. The complication rate did not change with increased surgeon experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult spinal deformity; early complications; pedicle subtraction osteotomy; perioperative complications

Year:  2015        PMID: 27781181      PMCID: PMC5077708          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Global Spine J        ISSN: 2192-5682


Introduction

Several studies over the last decade have reported on the use of the pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) to correct sagittal and coronal deformity.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Few studies specifically evaluate the perioperative complications related to this procedure.5 8 11 12 13 The reports that detail the complications of PSO originate out of a few major centers that were instrumental in perfecting and teaching the technique. As the use of this technique disseminates from the originators to other tertiary spine centers, the rate of complications may change. It is important to evaluate the complications of a newer surgical technique as its use spreads to those with less experience in the specific technique. The purpose of our study was to describe the perioperative complications (0 to 90 days) associated with PSOs performed at a tertiary spine center by two experienced spine surgeons who have more recently adopted the technique.

Methods

After International Review Board approval was obtained, we retrospectively reviewed our spine database for all patients who had undergone a PSO of the lumbar spine at our institution from 1999 to 2011 (Fig. 1). All procedures were performed by the two senior authors (M.D.D., D.S.B.) at one institution. Our surgical technique followed the description by Bridwell et al utilizing a standard Jackson frame, a high-speed drill, curettes and osteotomes for creation of the osteotomy, and thrombin-soaked collagen sponge as a hemostatic agent.14 The PSO was closed using a combination of compression and sagittal in situ bending of two rods across the osteotomy. Additional rod fixation (i.e., two additional rods across the PSO) was added at the surgeon's discretion but not routinely used in this series of patients. The PSOs were performed at T12 (2), L1 (2), L2 (17), L3 (33), L4 (9), and L5 (2). All patients who underwent a PSO at our institution were included in the study, and none were excluded. Both senior authors had greater than 10 years of experience as spine surgeons before performing their first PSO procedure. We recorded patient demographics, diagnosis, comorbidities, complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), blood products received, operative time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, number of levels fused, number of prior surgeries, and radiographic cervical C7 plumb line (sagittal vertical axis) as well as pre- and postoperative pelvic parameters (Tables 1, 2, 3).
Fig. 1

(A) Preoperative clinical images and (B) posteroanterior and lateral 36-inch standing radiographs of a 64-year-old woman with a previous L4–S1 fusion who presented with severe lumbar stenosis, neurogenic claudication, and inability to stand upright. (C, D) Post–pedicle subtraction osteotomy clinical and radiographic images showing improvement of both coronal and sagittal alignment.

Table 1

Sample statistics

Variable n (%)RangeMean
Male12 (18)
Female53 (82)
Age at surgery (y)24–8060
Follow up (mo)2–13326
Duration of surgery (min)256–768438
No. of levels fused3–168
ICU stay0–51
Hospital stay (d)3–247.6
Estimated blood loss (mL)450–9,0002,371
Intraoperative (U)0–142
Perioperative (U)0–593
Intraoperative blood salvage (mL)250–4,0001,130
Preoperative C7 plumb line−44–293118
Postoperative C7 plumb line−44–17553
Preoperative lumbar lordosis28 to −59−16
Postoperative lumbar lordosis−15 to −73−41
Perioperative deaths3 (4.6)
Prior surgeries55 (84.6)
 116 (24.6)
 212 (18.4)
 36 (9.2)
 421 (32.3)
Comorbidities56 (86.1)1.78
 121 (32.3)
 217 (26.1)
 312 (18.4)
 45 (6)
 51 (1)
Minor complications15 (23)
 112 (18.4)
 21 (1.5)
 32 (3)
Major complications10 (15.4)
 18 (12.3)
 21 (1.5)
 41 (1.5)
Postoperative complications (major + minor)20 (30.8)
 112 (18.4)
 25 (7.7)
 31 (1.5)
 41 (1.5)
 51 (1.5)
Revision surgeries22 (33.8)
 <3 mo11 (16.9)
 >3 mo11 (16.9)

Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit.

Table 2

Patient comorbidities

Patient comorbidity n (%)
Hypertension35 (53.8)
Peptic ulcer disease14 (21.5)
Hypothyroid disease18 (27.7)
Carcinoma in remission8 (12.3)
Asthma/COPD12 (18.5)
Coronary artery disease4 (6.2)
Diabetes5 (7.7)
Obesity8 (12.3)
Renal disease1 (1.5)
Substance abuse3 (4.6)
Coagulopathy5 (7.7)
Hepatitis3 (4.6)

Abbreviation: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Table 3

Diagnoses

Diagnosis n
Acquired kyphosis17
Fixed sagittal imbalance23
Fixed sagittal imbalance + degenerative scoliosis12
Fixed sagittal imbalance +adult idiopathic scoliosis13
Total65
Abbreviation: ICU, intensive care unit. Abbreviation: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. (A) Preoperative clinical images and (B) posteroanterior and lateral 36-inch standing radiographs of a 64-year-old woman with a previous L4–S1 fusion who presented with severe lumbar stenosis, neurogenic claudication, and inability to stand upright. (C, D) Post–pedicle subtraction osteotomy clinical and radiographic images showing improvement of both coronal and sagittal alignment. We categorized the complications as major and minor. The major complications included neurologic deficit, deep wound infection, myocardial infarct, pneumonia, respiratory distress, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, and death. Minor complications included ileus, superficial infection, urinary tract infection, arrhythmias, epidural hematoma, and superficial deep vein thrombosis. Intraoperative complications included excessive blood loss (>3,000 mL), dural tear, and vascular injury. We analyzed the data for relationships between the presence of a major complication and patient and clinical variables and surgeon experience with performing PSOs between 1999 and 2011. Our analysis included 65 patients (53 women and 12 men), with a mean age of 60 years (range 24 to 80) and mean follow-up of 41 months (range 2 to 166). The diagnosis included acquired kyphosis (17), fixed sagittal imbalance (FSI) (23), FSI and degenerative scoliosis (12), and FSI and adult idiopathic scoliosis (13; Table 3). Patient comorbidities are listed in Table 2. Student t test was used to analyze the radiographic C7 plumb line lumbar sagittal alignment data and pelvic parameters data. Wilcoxon rank sum was utilized to analyze data that was not normally distributed.

Results

Sample statistics including the number of minor and major complications are listed in Table 1. The mean duration of surgery was 438 minutes (range 256 to 768), the mean ICU stay was 1 day (range 0 to 5), and the mean hospital stay was 7.6 days (range 3 to 24). The mean EBL was 2,371 mL (range 450 to 9,000). A mean of 2 U of packed red blood cells was given during surgery, and a mean of 3 U of packed red blood cells was given in the perioperative period. A mean of 1,130 mL of salvaged red blood cells was given (range 250 to 4,000). The mean value of pelvic incidence was 59 degrees. The mean values of sacral slope were 24 degrees preoperatively and 32 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.001), and the values of pelvic tilt were 35 degrees preoperatively and 27 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean C7 plumb line preoperatively was 118 mm and postoperatively was 53 mm (p < 0.001). The mean lumbar lordosis was −16 degrees preoperatively and −41 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.001), for a mean correction of 25 degrees. Eighty-four percent (55/65) of our patients had at least 1 prior surgery, and 60% (39/65) had 2 or more prior surgeries (Table 1). Eighty-six percent (56/65) had at least 1 comorbidity, and 51% (35/65) had 2 or more comorbidities present at the time of surgery. Either a major or a minor complication occurred in 31% (20/65) of patients. Major complications occurred in 15% (10/65) of patients, and minor complications occurred in 23% (15/65). There were 3 perioperative deaths: 1 patient died secondary to a pedicle screw placed in the L1 vertebral body where an aberrant aortic artery had eroded into the vertebral body and 2 patients died postdischarge secondary to narcotic pain medication overdose. The most common major complication was neurologic deficit in 6.2% (4/65): 3 had a permanent foot drop, and 1 had paraplegia secondary to postoperative hematoma. The incidence of each major, minor, and intraoperative complication is listed in Table 4. Overall, there were 11 reoperations: 3 patients with deep postoperative wound infections with 2 of them requiring 2 irrigations and debridements (5), 2 patients requiring hardware revision, 2 patients with acute proximal functional failure, 1 patient with a epidural hematoma, and 1 patient with acute postoperative hemorrhage secondary to a screw placed in the aberrant aortic artery (who later died). There was no significant relationship between any of the patient and clinical variables and the presence of a major complication, except for the length of ICU stay (p = 0.04; Table 5). The incidence of major complications collected from 1999 to 2011 was evaluated, and no temporal correlations were noted between the PSOs that were performed early versus those performed late in our study period.
Table 4

Complications

Complications n (%)
Major (<3 mo)14 (21.5)
 Neurologic deficit4 (6.2)
 Deep wound infection3 (4.6)
 Myocardial infarction1 (1.5)
 Pneumonia2 (3)
 Respiratory distress syndrome1 (1.5)
 Perioperative death3 (4.6)
Minor complications (<3 mo)20 (30.8)
 Ileus6 (9.2)
 Superficial infection4 (6.2)
 UTI5 (7.7)
 Arrhythmias3 (4.6)
 Superficial DVT1 (1.5)
 Epidural hematoma1 (1.5)
Intraoperative complications15 (23)
 Excessive blood loss4 (6.1)
 Dural tears12 (18.4)
 Vascular injury1 (1.5)

Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; UTI, urinary tract infection.

Table 5

Relationship of patient and clinical variables to the presence of a major complication

Variable95% CI p Value
EBL1544.34–2,995.660.7328b
Age52.52–66.280.3801b
Operative time378.31–559.290.3827b
Follow-up224.07–620.370.1156b
No. levels fused1.1–3.90.0860b
No. comorbidities1–2.20.9035b
Previous surgeries−1.58–11.580.7669b
ICU stay0.62–1.190.0438b
Pre C7 plumb line29.29–287.910.2025a
Pre lumbar lordosis−35.08–2.790.8885a
Coronal curve−2.66 to −0.610.5540b

t test.

Wilcoxon rank sum.

Abbreviations: EBL, estimated blood loss; ICU, intensive care unit; Pre, preoperative.

Abbreviations: DVT, deep vein thrombosis; UTI, urinary tract infection. t test. Wilcoxon rank sum. Abbreviations: EBL, estimated blood loss; ICU, intensive care unit; Pre, preoperative.

Discussion

The reporting of results and complications with the technique of PSO has come primarily from centers that originated and perfected this complex procedure.4 5 6 12 As with many surgical techniques, the results and complications of PSO may differ between surgeons and centers that have varying degrees of experience with the technique. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the perioperative complications associated with PSO at a tertiary spine center in which the technique was recently adopted. Our technical results were similar to prior studies as evidenced by our radiographic and sagittal correction data. Our mean improvement in lumbar lordosis was 25 degrees, compared with 30 degrees reported by Berven et al,4 33 degrees by Bridwell et al,5 and 24 degrees by Ahn et al.6 Our perioperative data is comparable to previous reports on PSO. If we compare the operative time, EBL, blood products transfused, and hospital stay, our mean operative time (7.3 hours) was less than that reported by Bridwell et al (12.2 hours)5; however, they included total operative time, which included patients who underwent combined anteroposterior fusion. Our mean EBL (2,371 mL) was similar to that reported by Bridwell et al (2,386 mL)5 but less than that reported by Ahn et al (3,520 mL).6 Our mean hospital stay (7.6 days) was lower than that in previous studies.6 Operative and perioperative blood transfusions were similar across studies.5 Comprehensive data including the perioperative complications has been rarely reported in prior studies. Ahn et al reported 28 intraoperative complications in 25 patients.6 The highest reported complication was dural tear (17 patients). Two patients had nerve root injuries. Our rate of dural tear was 18.4%. Overall, they reported 55 complications in 38 patients. The most common complications were instrumentation-related, followed by pseudarthrosis and pneumonia. Five patients had neurologic deficits (6%), which was similar to our rate of neurologic deficits of 6.2%, but higher than the 2.8% reported at long-term follow-up by Buchowski et al.12 PSOs are performed most commonly as revision procedures in middle-aged and older women. The mean age of the patients in our study was 60 years; in the study by Bridwell et al, 53.4 years; and in the study by Ahn et al, 54.4 years. In our study, 85% of our patients had at least one prior spine surgery, which was similar to other reports.4 5 6 When we analyzed patients with major complications, age and revision were not significant factors (Table 5). However, this data may be impacted by the fact that most of our patients were over 50 years of age and most had prior surgery. If we compare our data with that reported for longer fusions in the older population, the complication rates are similar.15 The only correlation of a major complication in our study that was significant was length of ICU stay, which was not surprising as the major complication likely resulted in an increase of ICU days required. Our perioperative death rate was higher than that reported in other studies and highlights the psychosocial and technical complexity of patients undergoing multiple-revision spine surgery due to deformity. We had three deaths within the 90-day postoperative period. One was surgically related to an aberrant aortic artery that had eroded into the L1 vertebral body after multiple-revision spine surgery. This complication occurred prior to the initiation of the PSO during routine placement of an L1 pedicle screw that violated the aberrant aortic artery. The other two were due to narcotic pain medication overdose in the postdischarge period. Overall, our complication rates are similar to that reported out of centers with the initial experience in performing PSOs. The senior surgeons in our study were both experienced (>10 years) spine surgeons prior to performing their first PSOs, and the complication profiles were not temporally correlated with increased experience in performing this procedure. Inexperienced spine surgeons may have different results when initially performing this complex procedure. Our study is limited because it was retrospective and did not have controls for potential confounding factors. One strength of our study is that we included all patients who underwent a PSO at our institution and we captured all perioperative complications.

Conclusion

Our perioperative complication rates were similar to those previously reported from the initial centers with experience performing PSOs. The complications were not related to age, operative time, number of levels fused, prior surgeries, presence of comorbidities, or increased surgeon experience in performing this procedure.
  15 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Benson P Yang; Stephen L Ondra; Larry A Chen; Hee Soo Jung; Tyler R Koski; Sean A Salehi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-07

Review 2.  Outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance of multiple etiologies: a retrospective review of 140 patients.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jung-Hee Lee; Bi-O Jeong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients : a long-term follow-up data.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Seung-Chul Rhim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-02-28

4.  Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis.

Authors:  Minoru Ikenaga; Jitsuhiko Shikata; Mitsuru Takemoto; Chiaki Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-04

5.  Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60.

Authors:  Michael D Daubs; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Georgia Stobbs; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment.

Authors:  Jacob M Buchowski; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Craig A Kuhns; Ronald A Lehman; Youngjung J Kim; David Stewart; Chris Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Partial pedicle subtraction osteotomy as an alternative option for spinal sagittal deformity correction.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Dae-Hyun Park; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jung-Hee Lee; Kyoung-Jun Park
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell; Stephen J Lewis; Charles Edwards; Lawrence G Lenke; Theresa M Iffrig; Annette Berra; Christine Baldus; Kathy Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in elderly patients with degenerative sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Kyu-Jung Cho; Ki-Tack Kim; Whoan-Jeang Kim; Sang-Hoon Lee; Jae-Hoon Jung; Young-Tae Kim; Hae-Bong Park
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Maintenance of radiographic correction at 2 years following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy is superior with upper thoracic compared with thoracolumbar junction upper instrumented vertebra.

Authors:  Justin K Scheer; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Vedat Deviren; Richard Hostin; Ian M McCarthy; Gregory M Mundis; Douglas C Burton; Eric Klineberg; Munish Gupta; Khaled Kebaish; Christopher I Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  8 in total

1.  L5 pedicle subtraction osteotomy: indication, surgical technique and specificities.

Authors:  Abdulmajeed Alzakri; Louis Boissière; Derek T Cawley; Anouar Bourghli; Vincent Pointillart; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Posttraumatic deformity of the thoracolumbar spine].

Authors:  Miguel Pishnamaz; Matti Scholz; Per D Trobisch; Philipp Lichte; Christian Herren; Frank Hildebrand; Philipp Kobbe
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Correction of kyphotic fixed lumbar segments and hypolordosis with the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique].

Authors:  F Lattig; E Stettin; S Weckbach
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  Bowel dysfunction after elective spinal surgery: etiology, diagnostics and management based on the medical literature and experience in a university hospital.

Authors:  A Jaber; S Hemmer; R Klotz; T Ferbert; C Hensel; C Eisner; Y M Ryang; P Obid; K Friedrich; W Pepke; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Comparison of operative implications between adolescent and young adult idiopathic scoliosis patients from scoliosis research society mortality and morbidity database.

Authors:  Swamy Kurra; Prisco DeMercurio; William F Lavelle
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-05-24

6.  The Double-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Innovative One-Stage Surgical Technique for Posterior Kyphosis Correction.

Authors:  Marcus Jäger; Tjark Tassemeier
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2017-06-27

7.  Partial Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Patients with Thoracolumbar Fractures : Comparative Study between Burst Fracture and Posttraumatic Kyphosis.

Authors:  Ho Yong Choi; Dae Jean Jo
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2021-12-10

8.  Predictors for the restoration of the sagittal spinal malalignment in patients with lumbar stenosis after short-segment decompression and fusion surgery.

Authors:  Rufeng Huang; Fumin Pan; Weiguo Zhu; Chao Kong; Shibao Lu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 2.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.