David M Vock1, Michael T Durheim2,3, Wayne M Tsuang4, C Ashley Finlen Copeland3, Anastasios A Tsiatis5, Marie Davidian5, Megan L Neely2,6, David J Lederer7, Scott M Palmer2,3. 1. 1 Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2. 2 Duke Clinical Research Institute and. 3. 3 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 4. 4 Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 5. 5 Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina. 6. 6 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and. 7. 7 Department of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Lung transplantation is an accepted and increasingly employed treatment for advanced lung diseases, but the anticipated survival benefit of lung transplantation is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether and for which patients lung transplantation confers a survival benefit in the modern era of U.S. lung allocation. METHODS: Data on 13,040 adults listed for lung transplantation between May 2005 and September 2011 were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing. A structural nested accelerated failure time model was used to model the survival benefit of lung transplantation over time. The effects of patient, donor, and transplant center characteristics on the relative survival benefit of transplantation were examined. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 73.8% of transplant recipients were predicted to achieve a 2-year survival benefit with lung transplantation. The survival benefit of transplantation varied by native disease group (P = 0.062), with 2-year expected benefit in 39.2 and 98.9% of transplants occurring in those with obstructive lung disease and cystic fibrosis, respectively, and by lung allocation score at the time of transplantation (P < 0.001), with net 2-year benefit in only 6.8% of transplants occurring for lung allocation score less than 32.5 and in 99.9% of transplants for lung allocation score exceeding 40. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of adults undergoing transplantation experience a survival benefit, with the greatest potential benefit in those with higher lung allocation scores or restrictive native lung disease or cystic fibrosis. These results provide novel information to assess the expected benefit of lung transplantation at an individual level and to enhance lung allocation policy.
RATIONALE: Lung transplantation is an accepted and increasingly employed treatment for advanced lung diseases, but the anticipated survival benefit of lung transplantation is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether and for which patients lung transplantation confers a survival benefit in the modern era of U.S. lung allocation. METHODS: Data on 13,040 adults listed for lung transplantation between May 2005 and September 2011 were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing. A structural nested accelerated failure time model was used to model the survival benefit of lung transplantation over time. The effects of patient, donor, and transplant center characteristics on the relative survival benefit of transplantation were examined. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 73.8% of transplant recipients were predicted to achieve a 2-year survival benefit with lung transplantation. The survival benefit of transplantation varied by native disease group (P = 0.062), with 2-year expected benefit in 39.2 and 98.9% of transplants occurring in those with obstructive lung disease and cystic fibrosis, respectively, and by lung allocation score at the time of transplantation (P < 0.001), with net 2-year benefit in only 6.8% of transplants occurring for lung allocation score less than 32.5 and in 99.9% of transplants for lung allocation score exceeding 40. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of adults undergoing transplantation experience a survival benefit, with the greatest potential benefit in those with higher lung allocation scores or restrictive native lung disease or cystic fibrosis. These results provide novel information to assess the expected benefit of lung transplantation at an individual level and to enhance lung allocation policy.
Authors: Roger D Yusen; Leah B Edwards; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Christian Benden; Anne I Dipchand; Samuel B Goldfarb; Bronwyn J Levvey; Lars H Lund; Bruno Meiser; Joseph W Rossano; Josef Stehlik Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Gabriel Thabut; Jason D Christie; Hervé Mal; Michel Fournier; Olivier Brugière; Guy Leseche; Yves Castier; Dimitris Rizopoulos Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-06-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: David P Mason; Lillian H Batizy; Jeffrey Wu; Edward R Nowicki; Sudish C Murthy; Ann M McNeill; Marie M Budev; Atul C Mehta; Gösta B Pettersson; Eugene H Blackstone Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Gabriel Thabut; Jason D Christie; Philippe Ravaud; Yves Castier; Olivier Brugière; Michel Fournier; Hervé Mal; Guy Lesèche; Raphaël Porcher Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrew Wey; Sally K Gustafson; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Melissa Skeans; Cory R Schaffhausen; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Michael S Mulvihill; Hui J Lee; Jeremy Weber; Ashley Y Choi; Morgan L Cox; Babatunde A Yerokun; Muath A Bishawi; Jacob Klapper; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Matthew G Hartwig Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Robert M Reed; Howard J Cabral; Mark T Dransfield; Michael Eberlein; Christian A Merlo; Matthew J Mulligan; Giora Netzer; Pablo G Sanchez; Steven M Scharf; Don D Sin; Bartholome R Celli Journal: Chest Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Andrew Wey; Maryam Valapour; Melissa A Skeans; Nicholas Salkowski; Monica Colvin; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 8.086