Literature DB >> 32385559

The morphology of the tibial footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament changes with ageing from oval/elliptical to C-shaped.

Rodolfo Morales-Avalos1,2, Tadeo A Castillo-Escobedo3, Rodrigo E Elizondo-Omaña4, María Del Carmen Theriot-Giron5, Simone Perelli6, Santos Guzmán-López4, Víctor M Peña-Martínez3, Félix Vílchez-Cavazos3, Juan Carlos Monllau6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To further the current understanding of the modifications of the morphology of the ACL tibial footprint in healthy knees during the ageing process. The hypothesis is that there are differences in the morphology of the ACL tibial footprint between the cadavers of the young and elderly due to a degenerative physiological process that occurs over time.
METHODS: The tibial footprint of the ACL was dissected in 64 knee specimens of known gender and age. They were divided into four groups by age and gender, setting 50 years of age as the cut-off point. Three observers analyzed the tibial footprint dissections and the shape was described and classified.
RESULTS: The knees from the cadavers of males older than 50 years of age presented a "C" morphology in 85% of the cases. In the group of males aged less than 50 years, an oval/elliptical morphology was found in 85.7% of the cases. In the group of women over 50 years-old, the "C" morphology was observed in 82.3% of the cases. In women under the age of 50, the oval/elliptical morphology was found in 84.6% of the cases. A significant difference was observed between the prevalence rates of the morphologies of the younger and older groups (p < 0.001 for both genders). However, no differences were observed between males and females of the same age group (n.s.).
CONCLUSIONS: The morphology of the tibial footprint of the ACL presents significant variations with ageing. It can go from an oval/elliptical shape to a "C" shaped morphology. The results of this work make for an advance in the individualization of ACL reconstruction based on the age and the specific morphology of the tibial footprint.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; Age; C-shaped; Footprint; Shape; Tibial insertion

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32385559     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06049-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  40 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions.

Authors:  C D Harner; G H Baek; T M Vogrin; G J Carlin; S Kashiwaguchi; S L Woo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Quantitative In Situ Analysis of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Length, Midsubstance Cross-sectional Area, and Insertion Site Areas.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Fujimaki; Eric Thorhauer; Yusuke Sasaki; Patrick Smolinski; Scott Tashman; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Variation in the shape of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament: classification is required.

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Sebastian Irarrázaval; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Cara Vernacchia; Eric Thorhauer; Volker Musahl; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Morphometric side-to-side differences in human cruciate ligament insertions.

Authors:  Jens Dargel; Peer Pohl; Prokopios Tzikaras; Juergen Koebke
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  The fetal anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic and histologic study.

Authors:  Mario Ferretti; Eric A Levicoff; Trevor A Macpherson; Morey S Moreland; Moises Cohen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Anatomy of normal human anterior cruciate ligament attachments evaluated by divided small bundles.

Authors:  Kenji Hara; Tomoyuki Mochizuki; Ichiro Sekiya; Kumiko Yamaguchi; Keiichi Akita; Takeshi Muneta
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Bony and soft tissue landmarks of the ACL tibial insertion site: an anatomical study.

Authors:  Mario Ferretti; Daniel Doca; Sheila M Ingham; Moises Cohen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Alberto Grassi; Simone Perelli; Giuseppe Agrò; Federico Bozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 50 years of age.

Authors:  David Figueroa; Francisco Figueroa; Rafael Calvo; Alex Vaisman; Gonzalo Espinoza; Federico Gili
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Anatomy of the cruciate ligaments and their function in extension and flexion of the human knee joint.

Authors:  F K Fuss
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1989-02
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomy Focusing on the Mid-substance Insertion and Fan-like Extension Fibers.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Bunsei Goto
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Significance of the broad non-bony attachments of the anterior cruciate ligament on the tibial side.

Authors:  Satoru Muro; Jiyoon Kim; Sachiyuki Tsukada; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  The morphology of the femoral footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament changes with aging from a large semicircular shape to a small flat ribbon-like shape.

Authors:  Rodolfo Morales-Avalos; Simone Perelli; Félix Vilchez-Cavazos; Tadeo Castillo-Escobedo; Víctor M Peña-Martínez; Rodrigo Elizondo-Omaña; Santos Guzmán-López; José Ramón Padilla-Medina; Juan Carlos Monllau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.114

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.