Laura Kurth1, Brent Doney1, Sheila Weinmann2. 1. Respiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. 2. Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the occupational exposure levels assigned by our National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-specific job exposure matrix (NIOSH COPD JEM) and by expert evaluation of detailed occupational information for various jobs held by members of an integrated health plan in the Northwest USA. METHODS: We analysed data from a prior study examining COPD and occupational exposures. Jobs were assigned exposure levels using 2 methods: (1) the COPD JEM and (2) expert evaluation. Agreement (Cohen's κ coefficients), sensitivity and specificity were calculated to compare exposure levels assigned by the 2 methods for 8 exposure categories. RESULTS: κ indicated slight to moderate agreement (0.19-0.51) between the 2 methods and was highest for organic dust and overall exposure. Sensitivity of the matrix ranged from 33.9% to 68.5% and was highest for sensitisers, diesel exhaust and overall exposure. Specificity ranged from 74.7% to 97.1% and was highest for fumes, organic dust and mineral dust. CONCLUSIONS: This COPD JEM was compared with exposures assigned by experts and offers a generalisable approach to assigning occupational exposure. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the occupational exposure levels assigned by our National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-specific job exposure matrix (NIOSH COPD JEM) and by expert evaluation of detailed occupational information for various jobs held by members of an integrated health plan in the Northwest USA. METHODS: We analysed data from a prior study examining COPD and occupational exposures. Jobs were assigned exposure levels using 2 methods: (1) the COPD JEM and (2) expert evaluation. Agreement (Cohen's κ coefficients), sensitivity and specificity were calculated to compare exposure levels assigned by the 2 methods for 8 exposure categories. RESULTS: κ indicated slight to moderate agreement (0.19-0.51) between the 2 methods and was highest for organic dust and overall exposure. Sensitivity of the matrix ranged from 33.9% to 68.5% and was highest for sensitisers, diesel exhaust and overall exposure. Specificity ranged from 74.7% to 97.1% and was highest for fumes, organic dust and mineral dust. CONCLUSIONS: This COPD JEM was compared with exposures assigned by experts and offers a generalisable approach to assigning occupational exposure. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Brent Doney; Eva Hnizdo; Monica Graziani; Greg Kullman; Cecil Burchfiel; Sherry Baron; Kaori Fujishiro; Paul Enright; John L Hankinson; Karen Hinckley Stukovsky; Christopher J Martin; Kathleen M Donohue; R Graham Barr Journal: COPD Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Frank de Vocht; Jan-Paul Zock; Hans Kromhout; Jordi Sunyer; Josep M Antó; Peter Burney; Manolis Kogevinas Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: M C Matheson; G Benke; J Raven; M R Sim; H Kromhout; R Vermeulen; D P Johns; E H Walters; M J Abramson Journal: Thorax Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Sheila Weinmann; William M Vollmer; Victor Breen; Michael Heumann; Eva Hnizdo; Jacqueline Villnave; Brent Doney; Monica Graziani; Mary Ann McBurnie; A Sonia Buist Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Sara De Matteis; Deborah Jarvis; Sally Hutchings; Andy Darnton; David Fishwick; Steven Sadhra; Lesley Rushton; Paul Cullinan Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: George L Delclos; David Gimeno; Ahmed A Arif; Fernando G Benavides; Jan-Paul Zock Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-01-06 Impact factor: 4.897