Literature DB >> 27776893

Is spinal cord stimulation safe? A review of 13 years of implantations and complications.

J-C Kleiber1, B Marlier2, M Bannwarth2, E Theret2, P Peruzzi2, F Litre2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the complications of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic pain.
METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of 212 patients treated with SCS for chronic lower-limb neuropathic pain between March 2002 and February 2015 in a Reims academic hospital. All patients received a surgically implanted paddle-type electrode. Complications with this technique are here described and analyzed, and other treatment and preventative methods proposed.
RESULTS: The major indication was 'failed back surgery syndrome', and 74 (35%) patients experienced complications, of which 57% were benign, while 42% required invasive treatment. Most frequent complications (n=22, 10%) were hardware malfunctions. There were two cases (0.9%) of postoperative neurological deficit and nine (4.2%) with postoperative infections. All patients received the appropriate treatment for their complication.
CONCLUSION: Despite the presence of complications, SCS is still a safe technique, although careful patient selection and proper surgical technique can help to avoid major complications.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; Complications; Spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27776893     DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2016.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)        ISSN: 0035-3787            Impact factor:   2.607


  5 in total

Review 1.  Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Surgery.

Authors:  Jae Hwan Cho; Jae Hyup Lee; Kwang-Sup Song; Jae-Young Hong
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-08-07

2.  The Use of Remote Programming for Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients With Chronic Pain During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China.

Authors:  Yan Han; Yang Lu; Dengyu Wang; Mingshan Ran; Qidong Ren; Duo Xie; Tipu Z Aziz; Luming Li; James Jin Wang
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-03-22

3.  High-Density in Spinal Cord stimulation: Virtual Expert Registry (DISCOVER): Study Protocol for a Prospective Observational Trial.

Authors:  Mats De Jaeger; Robbert-Jan van Hooff; Lisa Goudman; Alexis Valenzuela Espinoza; Raf Brouns; Martine Puylaert; Wim Duyvendak; Maarten Moens
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017-05-30

Review 4.  A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device.

Authors:  Mayank Gupta; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Meghan Hughes; Anand Rotte
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience.

Authors:  Gernot Surges; Joachim Paulus; Theresa Blaß; Kerstin Mendryscha; Martin Bettag; Anand Rotte
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-07-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.