| Literature DB >> 27776348 |
Lin Zhou1, Yuan Chang1, Le Xu2, Son Tung Nguyen Hoang1, Zheng Liu3, Qiang Fu3, Zongming Lin1, Jiejie Xu3.
Abstract
Vascular mimicry (VM) refers to the plasticity of aggressive cancer cells forming de novo vascular networks, which promoted tumor metastasis. The aim of this study was evaluate the impact of VM on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Records from 202 patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for UCB at Zhongshan Hospital between 2002 and 2014 were reviewed. The presence of VM was identified by CD31-PAS double staining. Positive VM staining occurred in 19.3% (39 of 202) UCB cases, and it was associated with increased risks of recurrence (Log-Rank p<0.001). VM was identified as an independent prognostic factor (p=0.002). In the cohort with MIBC, patients with VM negative got CSS benefit from the use of ACT (p = 0.048). As for lung metastasis, the combination of VM and TNM stage (AUC 0.792) showed a better prognostic value than TNM stage alone (AUC 0.748, p = 0.008) or VM alone (AUC 0.714, p = 0.023). Vascular mimicry could be a potential prognosticator for recurrence-free survival in patients with UCB after RC. Vascular mimicry seems to predict risk of developing lung metastases after RC. The presence of VM identified a subgroup of patients with MIBC who appeared to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: adjuvant chemotherapy; bladder cancer; radical cystectomy; recurrence; vascular mimicry
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27776348 PMCID: PMC5342808 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12775
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Association of VM with clinical characteristics in patients treated by radical cystectomy for urothelial-cell carcinoma of the bladder
| Patients | VM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | p | ||
| 0.243 | ||||
| | 35(17.4%) | 31(15.4%) | 4(2.0%) | |
| | 166(82.6%) | 131(65.2%) | 35(17.4%) | |
| 61.65±11.28 | 61.17±11.56 | 63.64±9.91 | 0.263 | |
| 2.13±1.61 | 2.10±1.65 | 2.28±1.41 | 0.307 | |
| 0.035 | ||||
| PUNLMP+low grade | 48(23.9%) | 44(21.9%) | 4(2.0%) | |
| High grade | 153(76.1%) | 118(58.7%) | 35(17.4%) | |
| 0.010 | ||||
| Ta, Tis, T1 | 59(29.4%) | 54(26.9%) | 5(2.5%) | |
| T2 | 91(45.3%) | 74(36.8%) | 17(8.5%) | |
| T3 | 30(14.9%) | 21(10.4%) | 9(4.5%) | |
| T4 | 21(10.4%) | 13(6.5%) | 8(4.0%) | |
| 0.359 | ||||
| Absent | 193(96.0%) | 154(76.6%) | 39(19.4%) | |
| Present | 8(4.0%) | 8(4.0%) | 0(0.0%) | |
| 0.074 | ||||
| Absent | 98(48.8%) | 84(41.8%) | 14(7.0%) | |
| Present | 103(51.2%) | 78(38.8%) | 25(12.4%) | |
| 0.105 | ||||
| Absent | 191(95.0%) | 156(77.6%) | 35(17.4%) | |
| Present | 10(5.0%) | 6(3.0%) | 4(2.0%) | |
| 0.083 | ||||
| Absent | 132(65.7%) | 111(55.2%) | 21(10.4%) | |
| Present | 69(34.3%) | 51(25.4%) | 18(9.0%) | |
| 0.623 | ||||
| Negative | 194(96.5%) | 157(78.1%) | 37(18.4%) | |
| Positive | 7(3.5%) | 5(2.5%) | 2(1.0%) | |
| 0.373 | ||||
| Unifocal | 152(77.2%) | 124(62.9%) | 28(14.2%) | |
| Multifocal | 45(22.8%) | 34(17.3%) | 11(5.6%) | |
| 0.287 | ||||
| <3 | 66(32.8%) | 56(27.9%) | 10(5.0%) | |
| ≥3 | 135(67.2%) | 106(52.7%) | 29(14.4%) | |
| 0.262 | ||||
| No | 119(59.2%) | 99(49.3%) | 20(10.0%) | |
| Yes | 82(40.8%) | 63(31.3%) | 19(9.5%) | |
| <0.001 | ||||
| | 112(55.7%) | 100(49.8%) | 12(6.0%) | |
| | 89(44.3%) | 62(30.8%) | 27(13.4%) | |
Abbreviation: VM, Vascular Mimicry; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; LVI, lymphovascular invasion; PUNLMP, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential;
Figure 1Vascular mimicry in UCB tissues
Brown arrows indicate CD31+ endothelial blood vessels and pink arrows show PAS+/CD31- channels A-B. Scale bars (black lines) = 16.0 um.
Figure 2Subgroup analysis to assess prognostic value of VM by pathological grade and T stage
Kaplan–Meier analysis of RFS in patients with PUNLMP+low grade A., and with high grade B. Kaplan–Meier analysis of RFS in patients with NMIBC D., and with MIBC E. Hazard ratios for RFS probabilities in patients with high grade C. and MIBC F.
Figure 3Relationship between VM and Benefit from Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Kaplan–Meier analysis of CSS in patients with VM positive A., and with VM negative B. Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS in patients VM positive C., and with VM negative D.
Figure 4ROC analysis for the prediction of lung metastases
A. The difference analysis for serpin family between UCB with lung metastasis and UCB without lung metastasis B.
Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis of predictive factors of RFS
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | p | HR | 95% CI | p | |
| 0.978 | ||||||
| | 1 | — | ||||
| | 1.008 | 0.569-1.784 | ||||
| 1.012 | 0.994-1.030 | 0.211 | ||||
| 1.052 | 0.938-1.181 | 0.387 | ||||
| 0.002 | 0.055 | |||||
| | 1 | — | 1 | — | ||
| | 2.550 | 1.413-4.601 | 1.840 | 0.986-3.434 | ||
| | 1 | — | 1 | — | ||
| | 1.532 | 0.897-2.615 | 0.118 | 1.058 | 0.595-1.881 | 0.847 |
| | 2.033 | 1.040-3.975 | 0.038 | 1.059 | 0.495-2.265 | 0.883 |
| | 2.850 | 1.416-5.735 | 0.003 | 1.627 | 0.756-3.499 | 0.213 |
| <0.001 | 0.002 | |||||
| | 1 | — | 1 | — | ||
| | 2.516 | 1.599-3.959 | 2.156 | 1.325-3.510 | ||
| 0.613 | ||||||
| | 1 | — | ||||
| | 0.743 | 0.235-2.351 | ||||
| 0.011 | 0.279 | |||||
| | 1 | — | 1 | — | ||
| | 1.738 | 1.137-2.655 | 1.307 | 0.805-2.123 | ||
| 0.021 | 0.351 | |||||
| | 1 | — | 1 | — | ||
| | 1.651 | 1.080-2.524 | 1.251 | 0.781-2.003 | ||
| 0.777 | ||||||
| | 1 | — | ||||
| | 0.878 | 0.356-2.166 | ||||
| 0.336 | ||||||
| | 1 | — | ||||
| | 1.588 | 0.582-4.335 | ||||
| 0.003 | 0.094 | |||||
| | 1 | — | 1 | — | ||
| | 2.978 | 1.433-6.189 | 1.953 | 0.892-4.277 | ||
| 0.774 | ||||||
| | 1 | — | ||||
| | 1.076 | 0.653-1.774 | ||||
| 0.913 | ||||||
| | 1 | — | ||||
| | 1.025 | 0.658-1.597 | ||||
Abbreviation: VM, vascular Mimicry; LVI, lymphovascular invasion; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index.
Figure 5Nomogram for predicting RFS of UCB patients after RC
Nomogram to predict RFS at 2, 5 and 8 years after RC (left). The calibration plots for predicting RFS at 2 years (right).
Prognostication comparison of built-up nomogram and BCRC nomogram
| No. of patients | C-index | AIC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nomogram | BCRC nomogram | p | Nomogram | BCRC nomogram | ||
| 202 | 0.678 | 0.642 | 0.172 | 853.9 | 863.0 | |
| 142 | 0.666 | 0.617 | 0.223 | 612.9 | 621.7 | |
| 154 | 0.650 | 0.639 | 0.694 | 688.1 | 692.9 | |
Abbreviation: C-index, concordance index; AIC, Akaike's information criterion; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer.