Zhifei Cao1, Meimei Bao, Lucio Miele, Fazlul H Sarkar, Zhiwei Wang, Quansheng Zhou. 1. Cyrus Tang Hematology Center, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Ministry of Health, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, PR China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vasculogenic mimicry (VM) has been reported in various malignant tumours and is known to play an important role in cancer progression and metastasis. However, the impact of VM on the overall survival of human cancer patients remains controversial. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether VM is associated with 5-year survival of human cancer patients. METHODS: Twenty-two eligible clinical studies with data on both tumour cell-dominant VM and the 5-year survival of 3062 patients involved in 15 types of cancers were pooled in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival of VM-positive and -negative cancer patients was 31% and 56%, respectively. The relative risk (RR) of the 5-year survival of VM-positive patients was significantly higher than that of VM-negative cases (RR=1.531; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.357-1.726; P<0.001). Notably, metastatic melanoma patients demonstrated a higher VM rate (45.3%) than patients with primary melanoma (23.1%) and showed worse 5-year survival, suggesting that VM contributes to tumour metastasis and poor prognosis in cancer patients. Subgroup analysis indicated that a poor 5-year survival was significantly associated with eight types of VM-positive malignant tumours, such as lung, colon, liver cancers, sarcomas and melanoma; but was not associated with the seven other types of cancers, such as prostate cancer. Heterogeneity and publication biases were found among the 22 studies, mainly due to the divergent characteristics of cancers and extremely low survival rate in six types of malignant tumours. CONCLUSION: VM-positive cancer patients show a poor 5-year overall survival compared with VM-negative malignant tumour cases, particularly in metastatic cancer.
BACKGROUND: Vasculogenic mimicry (VM) has been reported in various malignant tumours and is known to play an important role in cancer progression and metastasis. However, the impact of VM on the overall survival of humancancerpatients remains controversial. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether VM is associated with 5-year survival of humancancerpatients. METHODS: Twenty-two eligible clinical studies with data on both tumour cell-dominant VM and the 5-year survival of 3062 patients involved in 15 types of cancers were pooled in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival of VM-positive and -negative cancerpatients was 31% and 56%, respectively. The relative risk (RR) of the 5-year survival of VM-positive patients was significantly higher than that of VM-negative cases (RR=1.531; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.357-1.726; P<0.001). Notably, metastatic melanomapatients demonstrated a higher VM rate (45.3%) than patients with primary melanoma (23.1%) and showed worse 5-year survival, suggesting that VM contributes to tumour metastasis and poor prognosis in cancerpatients. Subgroup analysis indicated that a poor 5-year survival was significantly associated with eight types of VM-positive malignant tumours, such as lung, colon, liver cancers, sarcomas and melanoma; but was not associated with the seven other types of cancers, such as prostate cancer. Heterogeneity and publication biases were found among the 22 studies, mainly due to the divergent characteristics of cancers and extremely low survival rate in six types of malignant tumours. CONCLUSION: VM-positive cancerpatients show a poor 5-year overall survival compared with VM-negative malignant tumour cases, particularly in metastatic cancer.
Authors: Joseph Di Michele; Fabio Rotondo; Kalman Kovacs; Luis V Syro; George M Yousef; Michael D Cusimano; Antonio Di Ieva Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Elvin Wagenblast; Mar Soto; Sara Gutiérrez-Ángel; Christina A Hartl; Annika L Gable; Ashley R Maceli; Nicolas Erard; Alissa M Williams; Sun Y Kim; Steffen Dickopf; J Chuck Harrell; Andrew D Smith; Charles M Perou; John E Wilkinson; Gregory J Hannon; Simon R V Knott Journal: Nature Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Shinji Ozaki; Raja Vuyyuru; Ken Kageyama; Mizue Terai; Masahiro Ohara; Hanyin Cheng; Tim Manser; Michael J Mastrangelo; Andrew E Aplin; Takami Sato Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Mary J C Hendrix; Elisabeth A Seftor; Richard E B Seftor; Jun-Tzu Chao; Du-Shieng Chien; Yi-Wen Chu Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 12.310