Literature DB >> 27775742

Interstitial flow differentially increases patient-derived glioblastoma stem cell invasion via CXCR4, CXCL12, and CD44-mediated mechanisms.

Kathryn M Kingsmore1, Daniel K Logsdon1, Desiree H Floyd2, Shayn M Peirce1, Benjamin W Purow2, Jennifer M Munson1.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) prognosis remains dismal due in part to the invasiveness of GBM cells. Interstitial fluid flow (IFF) has been shown to increase invasion of glioma cells in vitro through the CXCR4 receptor interacting with autologous, pericellular gradients of CXCL12 (autologous chemotaxis) or through the CD44 receptor interactions with the extracellular matrix (hyaluronan-mediated mechanotransduction). These mechanisms have not been examined together and thus we hypothesized that both mechanisms contribute to invasion in populations of cancer cells. Therefore, we examined IFF-stimulated CXCR4-, CXCL12-, and CD44-dependent invasion in patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). Using our 3D in vitro assay and correlative in vivo studies we demonstrated GSC lines show increased invasion with flow. This flow-stimulated invasion was reduced by blockade of CXCR4, CXCL12, and/or CD44, revealing that GSC invasion may be mediated simultaneously by both mechanisms. Characterization of CXCR4+, CXCL12+, and CD44+ populations in four GSC lines revealed different percentages of protein positive subpopulations for each line. We developed an agent-based model to identify the contributions of each subpopulation to flow-stimulated invasion and validated the model through comparisons with experimental blocking studies. Clinically relevant radiation therapy increased flow-stimulated invasion in one GSC line. Our agent-based model predicted that IFF-stimulated invasion is driven primarily by CXCR4+CXCL12+ populations, and, indeed our irradiated cells had an increase in this subpopulation. Together, these data indicate that different mechanisms govern the flow response across GSCs, but that within a single patient, there are subpopulations of GSCs that respond to flow via either CD44- or CXCR4-CXCL12 mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27775742     DOI: 10.1039/c6ib00167j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)        ISSN: 1757-9694            Impact factor:   2.192


  37 in total

1.  Microfluidic modeling of the biophysical microenvironment in tumor cell invasion.

Authors:  Yu Ling Huang; Jeffrey E Segall; Mingming Wu
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Dissecting and rebuilding the glioblastoma microenvironment with engineered materials.

Authors:  Kayla J Wolf; Joseph Chen; Jason Coombes; Manish K Aghi; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 66.308

3.  Assessing multiparametric drug response in tissue engineered tumor microenvironment models.

Authors:  Alexandra R Harris; Jessica X Yuan; Jennifer M Munson
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Modulating microenvironments for treating glioblastoma.

Authors:  LaDeidra Monet Roberts; Jennifer Munson
Journal:  Curr Tissue Microenviron Rep       Date:  2020-08-13

Review 5.  Engineering in vitro immune-competent tissue models for testing and evaluation of therapeutics.

Authors:  Jennifer H Hammel; Jonathan M Zatorski; Sophie R Cook; Rebecca R Pompano; Jennifer M Munson
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Assessing drug response in engineered brain microenvironments.

Authors:  Kinsley M Tate; Jennifer M Munson
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 7.  Methods to measure, model and manipulate fluid flow in brain.

Authors:  Krishnashis Chatterjee; Cora M Carman-Esparza; Jennifer M Munson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Patient-Specific Characterization of Breast Cancer Hemodynamics Using Image-Guided Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; David A Hormuth; Todd A Oliver; Federico Pineda; Guillermo Lorenzo; Gregory S Karczmar; Robert D Moser; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Chemoprotection Across the Tumor Border: Cancer Cell Response to Doxorubicin Depends on Stromal Fibroblast Ratios and Interstitial Therapeutic Transport.

Authors:  Daniel K Logsdon; Garrett F Beeghly; Jennifer M Munson
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 10.  Engineering strategies to capture the biological and biophysical tumor microenvironment in vitro.

Authors:  Matthew L Tan; Lu Ling; Claudia Fischbach
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 17.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.