Literature DB >> 31719872

Chemoprotection Across the Tumor Border: Cancer Cell Response to Doxorubicin Depends on Stromal Fibroblast Ratios and Interstitial Therapeutic Transport.

Daniel K Logsdon1, Garrett F Beeghly1, Jennifer M Munson1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Increasing evidence suggests that the tumor microenvironment reduces therapeutic delivery and may lead to chemotherapeutic resistance. At tumor borders, drug is convectively transported across a unique microenvironment composed of inverse gradients of stromal and tumor cells. These regions are particularly important to overall survival, as they are often missed through surgical intervention and contain many invading cells, often responsible for metastatic spread. An understanding of how cells in this tumor-border region respond to chemotherapy could begin to elucidate the role of transport and intercellular interactions in relation to chemoresistance. Here we examine the contribution of drug transport and stromal fibroblasts to breast cancer response to doxorubicin using in silico and in vitro models of the tumor-stroma interface.
METHODS: 2D culture systems were utilized to determine the effects of modulated ratios of fibroblasts and cancer cells on overall cancer cell viability. A homogenous breast mimetic in vitro 3D collagen I-based hydrogel system, with drug delivered via pressure driven flow (0.5 µm/s), was developed to determine the effects of transport and fibroblasts on doxorubicin treatment efficacy. Using a novel layered tumor bulk-to-stroma transition in vitro 3D hydrogel model, ratios of MDA-MB-231s and fibroblasts were seeded in successive layers creating cellular gradients, yielding insight into region specific cancer cell viability at the tumor border. In silico models, utilizing concentration profiles developed in COMSOL Multiphysics, were optimized for time dependent viability prediction and confirmation of in vitro findings.
RESULTS: In general, the addition of fibroblasts increased viability of cancer cells exposed to doxorubicin, indicating a protective effect of co-culture. More specifically, however, modulating ratios of cancer cells (MDA-MB-231):fibroblasts in 2D co-cultures, to mimic the tumor-stroma transition, resulted in a linear decrease in cancer cell viability from 77% (4:1) to 44% (1:4). Similar trends were seen in the breast-mimetic in vitro 3D collagen I-based homogenous hydrogel system. Our in vitro and in silico tumor border models indicate that MDA-MB-231s at the top of the gel, indicative of the tumor bulk, receive the greatest concentration of drug for the longest time, yet cellular death is lowest in this region. This trend is reversed for MDA-MB-231s alone.
CONCLUSION: Together, our data indicate that fibroblasts are chemoprotective at lower density, resulting in less tumor death in regions of higher chemotherapy concentration. Additionally, chemotherapeutic agent transport properties can modulate this effect. © Biomedical Engineering Society 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D cell culture; Breast cancer; Doxorubicin; Drug delivery; Fibroblasts; Interstitial flow; Tumor microenvironment

Year:  2017        PMID: 31719872      PMCID: PMC6816789          DOI: 10.1007/s12195-017-0498-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng        ISSN: 1865-5025            Impact factor:   2.321


  73 in total

Review 1.  Cell adhesion is a key determinant in de novo multidrug resistance (MDR): new targets for the prevention of acquired MDR.

Authors:  K H Shain; W S Dalton
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 2.  Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro.

Authors:  Linda G Griffith; Melody A Swartz
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Therapeutic implications of tumor interstitial fluid pressure in subcutaneous RG-2 tumors.

Authors:  Yot Navalitloha; Erica S Schwartz; Elizabeth N Groothuis; Cathleen V Allen; Robert M Levy; Dennis R Groothuis
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Tumour stem cells and drug resistance.

Authors:  Michael Dean; Tito Fojo; Susan Bates
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Transport of molecules, particles, and cells in solid tumors.

Authors:  R K Jain
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.590

6.  Multiscale agent-based cancer modeling.

Authors:  Le Zhang; Zhihui Wang; Jonathan A Sagotsky; Thomas S Deisboeck
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Prognostic significance of the tumor-stroma ratio: validation study in node-negative premenopausal breast cancer patients from the EORTC perioperative chemotherapy (POP) trial (10854).

Authors:  T J A Dekker; C J H van de Velde; G W van Pelt; J R Kroep; J-P Julien; V T H B M Smit; R A E M Tollenaar; W E Mesker
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Spatial Proximity to Fibroblasts Impacts Molecular Features and Therapeutic Sensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells Influencing Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Doris P Tabassum; Michalina Janiszewska; Andrew E Place; Anne Trinh; Andrii I Rozhok; Saumyadipta Pyne; Jennifer L Guerriero; Shaokun Shu; Muhammad Ekram; Alexander Ishkin; Daniel P Cahill; Yuri Nikolsky; Timothy A Chan; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Susan Hilsenbeck; Rachel Schiff; Kent C Osborne; Antony Letai; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Quantitation of doxorubicin uptake, efflux, and modulation of multidrug resistance (MDR) in MDR human cancer cells.

Authors:  Fei Shen; Shaoyou Chu; Aimee K Bence; Barbara Bailey; Xinjian Xue; Priscilla A Erickson; Marshall H Montrose; William T Beck; Leonard C Erickson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Peripheral lymph node stromal cells can promote growth and tumorigenicity of breast carcinoma cells through the release of IGF-I and EGF.

Authors:  Christina LeBedis; Keguan Chen; Lucia Fallavollita; Tarek Boutros; Pnina Brodt
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  3D Cell Culture Models as Recapitulators of the Tumor Microenvironment for the Screening of Anti-Cancer Drugs.

Authors:  Mélanie A G Barbosa; Cristina P R Xavier; Rúben F Pereira; Vilma Petrikaitė; M Helena Vasconcelos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Designing Patient-Driven, Tissue-Engineered Models of Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Garrett F Beeghly; Candace Thomas; Jessica X Yuan; Alexandra R Harris; Jennifer M Munson
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18

3.  A patient-designed tissue-engineered model of the infiltrative glioblastoma microenvironment.

Authors:  R C Cornelison; J X Yuan; K M Tate; A Petrosky; G F Beeghly; M Bloomfield; S C Schwager; A L Berr; C A Stine; D Cimini; F F Bafakih; J W Mandell; B W Purow; B J Horton; J M Munson
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.