Expedited structure-based optimization of the initial fragment hit 1 led to the design of (R)-7 (AZD2716) a novel, potent secreted phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) inhibitor with excellent preclinical pharmacokinetic properties across species, clear in vivo efficacy, and minimized safety risk. Based on accumulated profiling data, (R)-7 was selected as a clinical candidate for the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Expedited structure-based optimization of the initial fragment hit 1 led to the design of (R)-7 (AZD2716) a novel, potent secreted phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) inhibitor with excellent preclinical pharmacokinetic properties across species, clear in vivo efficacy, and minimized safety risk. Based on accumulated profiling data, (R)-7 was selected as a clinical candidate for the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Entities:
Keywords:
Secreted phospholipase A2; atherosclerosis; coronary artery disease; fragment screening; fragment-based drug discovery; inhibitor; sPLA2
Secreted phospholipase
A2 (sPLA2) are enzymes that hydrolyze the acyl
ester at the sn-2 position of sn-3 glycerophospholipids,[1] a process characterized by complex interfacial
kinetics of substrate–enzyme binding and catalysis.[2] Eleven sPLA2 enzymes (group Ib-XIIb)
have so far been identified in mammals,[3−5] several of which have
been detected in humanatherosclerotic lesions.[6] Among these, group IIa, V, and X sPLA2 isoforms
are present in human carotid atherosclerotic lesions and have been
associated with disease progression. They have been implicated in
several proatherogenic actions in the arterial wall.[7−9] Due to their hydrolytic action on lipoprotein phospholipids, sPLA2s promote lipid accumulation, induce significant lipoprotein
remodeling, macrophage activation, and foam cell formation.[10,11] Furthermore, as the rate-limiting step in eicosanoid production,
sPLA2-mediated release of arachidonic acid from the sn-2 position of phospholipids renders them highly pro-inflammatory
enzymes.[10,11] In addition, epidemiological data has shown
that increased levels of sPLA2 protein and sPLA2 activity are independently associated with risk of cardiovascular
events and prevalence of atherosclerosis.[11] Owing to the pivotal role of sPLA2s in regulating lipoprotein
function and inflammatory mechanisms, two crucial components of atherogenesis,
sPLA2 inhibitors[12] could be
useful for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Interestingly, the archetypal
sPLA2 inhibitor varespladib methyl (Figure ) was evaluated in short duration clinical
trials for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and acute coronary
syndrome with negative results.[13,14]
Figure 1
sPLA2 inhibitor
varespladib methyl, its active metabolite varespladib, and initial
fragment hit 1.
sPLA2 inhibitor
varespladib methyl, its active metabolite varespladib, and initial
fragment hit 1.We thus set out to identify novel sPLA2 inhibitors
that could be used in longer term coronary artery disease-based clinical
studies to more properly assess the relevance of their lipoprotein-modifying
effects[15−17] on cardiovascular disease, alongside their anti-inflammatory
properties.Given the competitive landscape, medicinal chemistry
precedents and available structural information for sPLA2 enzymes, we opted for a structure-based fragment approach to maximize
the chances of novelty and developability.[18] Analysis of potency data in combination with the available ligand-bound
sPLA2 crystal structures[19] indicated
that primary amides are extremely effective sPLA2 warheads,
as they establish three hydrogen bonds with sPLA2 and one
coordination bond with the catalytic calcium ion. We assembled a selection
of primary aromatic carboxamide-containing fragments (heavy atom count
≥10 and ≤18) by mining in house biochemical and biophysical
assay data against the sPLA2-IIa and sPLA2-X
isoforms. The selection was based on activity against sPLA2-IIa, which is the most widely expressed isoform in humans,[20] but also on inspection of crystal structures
and chemical evolution potential.The triaging process identified
compound 1 (LE: 0.39) originating from a legacy fragment/HTS
campaign as the most promising fragment lead. As the translatability
to a clinical setting was of special importance, we also triaged the
activities for sPLA2 activity inhibition in human plasma
(the mode-of-action biomarker to be used in clinical trials), as measured
using a previously established protocol.[21]Compound 1 inhibited sPLA2-IIa (IC50: 24 μM) and human plasma sPLA2 activity
(ICu,50: 0.9 μM) in a concentration dependent manner
(Table ). Going forward,
as plasma sPLA2 activity is the result of various sPLA2 isoforms and we were interested in identifying a broad spectrum
sPLA2 inhibitor, we also monitored inhibition of sPLA2-V and sPLA2-X, given their potential role in lipoprotein
modulation.[16] Lastly, to avoid the need
for a prodrug strategy (e.g., varespladib methyl) we carefully evaluated
compound lipophilicity against passive permeability, solubility, and
metabolic stability, prior to verifying the pharmacokinetic (PK) and
pharmacodynamic (PD) profile in vivo.
Table 1
Initial Profile for the Fragment Hit 1
entry
sPLA2-IIa IC50 (μM)
plasma ICu,50 (μM)a
Fu (%)
LE/LLEb
varespladib
0.028
0.008
12.5
0.37/7.2
1
24
0.9
1.8
0.39/2.2
Calculated
as plasma sPLA2 IC50 (μM) × compound’s
unbound fraction in human plasma (Fu)/100. Fu = 100 – human protein binding (%).
Ligand efficiency, LE (kcal/mol/HAC),
calculated as −RT ln(sPLA2-IIa
IC50)/heavy atom count. Ligand lipophilicity efficiency
(LLE) calculated as pIC50 (sPLA2-IIa) –
logD.
Calculated
as plasma sPLA2 IC50 (μM) × compound’s
unbound fraction in human plasma (Fu)/100. Fu = 100 – human protein binding (%).Ligand efficiency, LE (kcal/mol/HAC),
calculated as −RT ln(sPLA2-IIa
IC50)/heavy atom count. Ligand lipophilicity efficiency
(LLE) calculated as pIC50 (sPLA2-IIa) –
logD.The crystal structure
of 1 bound to sPLA2-X confirmed the binding
mode of the primary amide, with hydrogen-bonding to sPLA2-X’s G28, H46, and D47 (corresponding to sPLA2-IIa G29, H47,
and D48) and coordination to the calcium ion was observed, as shown
in Figure . Additionally,
the 4-benzyl substituent was located in a lipophilic pocket consisting
of residues I2, L5, A6, V9, P17, I18, and M21 (corresponding to L2,
F5, H6, I9, A17, A18, and G22 in sPLA2-IIa, Figure ). While the two sPLA2 isoforms are identical in the amide coordinating residues, the lipophilic
pocket that accommodates the benzyl group is slightly smaller in sPLA2-IIa.
However, superposition of the sPLA2-IIa and sPLA2-X crystal structures suggested that the benzyl group of 1 could fit in the slightly smaller sPLA2-IIa pocket.
Figure 2
Superposition
of the crystal structure of 1 bound to sPLA2-X (cyan) and a crystal structure of sPLA2-IIa (gray).
Residues that differ between the two isoforms are labeled in cyan
and gray, respectively. The calcium ion is depicted as a purple sphere
and hydrogen bonds are displayed as dashed lines.
Superposition
of the crystal structure of 1 bound to sPLA2-X (cyan) and a crystal structure of sPLA2-IIa (gray).
Residues that differ between the two isoforms are labeled in cyan
and gray, respectively. The calcium ion is depicted as a purple sphere
and hydrogen bonds are displayed as dashed lines.We therefore devised a chemical exploration strategy starting
from the binding mode of 1. Here, special effort was
placed upon establishing a second coordination bond to the catalytic
calcium ion. The reasoning was 2-fold: (a) to increase affinity and
functional inhibition of the enzyme as a result of a bidentate calcium
chelate and additional van der Waals contact with the enzyme, and
(b) to allow a more balanced lipophilicity profile of the final compounds
as the additional calcium interacting moiety was anticipated to be
a carboxylic acid. The ortho position of the benzamide
ring was identified as a favorable substitution vector to deploy such
a strategy. Based on iterative molecular modeling and careful consideration
of theoretical affinity gain and ligand efficiency prediction, we
synthesized compounds 2–6, according
to Scheme (for compound 4 refer to Scheme ). Key steps involved the formation of the boronic acid by ortho lithiation[22] of the 4-benzylbenzonitrile
(step b) followed by a Suzuki–Miyaura coupling and a controlled
hydrolysis (step d) to generate both the amide and carboxylic acid
functions (Scheme ).
Scheme 1
General Synthesis of Compounds 2, 3, 5, and 6
Conditions:
(a) benzylzinc bromide, Pd(Ph3)4, THF, 60 °C.
(b) 1. nBuLi, tetramethylpiperidine; 2. B(OiPr)3, THF −78 °C. (c) Compound 2, 3, 5: 3-bromophenyl carboxylic acid A, PdCl2(dppf), Cs2CO3, DMF, 60–90
°C. Compound 6: Pd(P(Ph3)4, Cs2CO3, DMF 90. (d) Compound 2, 3, 5: n-propanol/H2O (10:1), KOH
(10 equiv), 80–100 °C, or THF, H2SO4. Compound 6: KOH (10 equiv), MeOH/H2O, microwave
130 °C, 20 min.
Scheme 2
General Synthesis
of sPLA2 Inhibitors 4 and 7–9
Conditions: (a) appropriate malonate,
Cs2CO3, DMF, 70 °C, 2 h. (b) NaOH (4 equiv),
H2O/MeOH 3:1 80 °C 2 h. (c) HOAc (3 M), reflux. (d)
HCl, MeOH 60 °C, 2.5 h. (e) (Bpin)2 (1.3 equiv), KOAc
(2.5 equiv), PdCl2(dppf) (6.5 mol %), dioxane, 90 °C.
(f) BnZnBr (1.5 equiv, 0.5 M in THF), Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol %), THF, 60 °C, 2 h. (g) Compound 4: 3-(3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)phenylboronic
acid (commercial), Pd(Ph3)4. Compound 7: PdCl2(dbpf) (5 mol %), C. Cs2CO3, DMF, 90 °C, 1.5 h. (h) n-Propanol/H2O (10:1), KOH (10 equiv), 80–100 °C. (i) B, PdCl2(dppf), Cs2CO3, DMF,
90 °C.
General Synthesis of Compounds 2, 3, 5, and 6
Conditions:
(a) benzylzinc bromide, Pd(Ph3)4, THF, 60 °C.
(b) 1. nBuLi, tetramethylpiperidine; 2. B(OiPr)3, THF −78 °C. (c) Compound 2, 3, 5: 3-bromophenyl carboxylic acid A, PdCl2(dppf), Cs2CO3, DMF, 60–90
°C. Compound 6: Pd(P(Ph3)4, Cs2CO3, DMF 90. (d) Compound 2, 3, 5: n-propanol/H2O (10:1), KOH
(10 equiv), 80–100 °C, or THF, H2SO4. Compound 6: KOH (10 equiv), MeOH/H2O, microwave
130 °C, 20 min.
General Synthesis
of sPLA2 Inhibitors 4 and 7–9
Conditions: (a) appropriate malonate,
Cs2CO3, DMF, 70 °C, 2 h. (b) NaOH (4 equiv),
H2O/MeOH 3:1 80 °C 2 h. (c) HOAc (3 M), reflux. (d)
HCl, MeOH 60 °C, 2.5 h. (e) (Bpin)2 (1.3 equiv), KOAc
(2.5 equiv), PdCl2(dppf) (6.5 mol %), dioxane, 90 °C.
(f) BnZnBr (1.5 equiv, 0.5 M in THF), Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol %), THF, 60 °C, 2 h. (g) Compound 4: 3-(3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)phenylboronic
acid (commercial), Pd(Ph3)4. Compound 7: PdCl2(dbpf) (5 mol %), C. Cs2CO3, DMF, 90 °C, 1.5 h. (h) n-Propanol/H2O (10:1), KOH (10 equiv), 80–100 °C. (i) B, PdCl2(dppf), Cs2CO3, DMF,
90 °C.Introduction of a 3-benzoic acid
moiety at the 2-position of 4-benzylbenzamide 1, albeit
nonoptimal, confirmed the potential for growth at that position (2, Table ).
Progressive elongation at the carboxylic acid position by introduction
of methylene units (3–5) had a parabolic
effect on potency, with the 3-phenylpropionic acid side chain yielding
the most potent and ligand efficient derivative (4, Table ). Replacement of
the benzylic methylene by an ether oxygen or further elongating the
hydrocarbon chain were not tolerated (cf. 5 and 6, Table ),
hinting at a specific conformational requirement for the carboxylic
acid-containing side chain. The cocrystal structure of sPLA2-IIa and 4 confirmed the previously hypothesized ligand-mediated
calcium chelation, as displayed in Figure .
Table 2
sPLA2 Potency
and Ligand Efficiencies for Compounds 2–6a
Results are mean
of at least two experiments. Experimental errors within 20% of value.
Calculated as plasma sPLA2
IC50 (μM) × compound’s unbound fraction
in human plasma (Fu)/100. Fu = 100 – human protein binding(%)
Ligand efficiency, LE (kcal/mol/HAC),
calculated as −RT ln(sPLA2-IIa
IC50)/heavy atom count. Ligand lipophilicity efficiency
(LLE) calculated as pIC50 (sPLA2-IIa) –
logD.
Not active at maximum
tested concentration (25 μM).
Not determined.
Figure 3
Cocrystal
structure of 4 bound to sPLA2-IIa. The calcium
ion is depicted as a purple sphere, and relevant hydrogen bonds are
displayed as dashed lines.
Results are mean
of at least two experiments. Experimental errors within 20% of value.Calculated as plasma sPLA2
IC50 (μM) × compound’s unbound fraction
in human plasma (Fu)/100. Fu = 100 – human protein binding(%)Ligand efficiency, LE (kcal/mol/HAC),
calculated as −RT ln(sPLA2-IIa
IC50)/heavy atom count. Ligand lipophilicity efficiency
(LLE) calculated as pIC50 (sPLA2-IIa) –
logD.Not active at maximum
tested concentration (25 μM).Not determined.Cocrystal
structure of 4 bound to sPLA2-IIa. The calcium
ion is depicted as a purple sphere, and relevant hydrogen bonds are
displayed as dashed lines.The carbonyl oxygen atom of the amide group of 4 provided the first coordination bond to calcium, analogously to 1. The carboxylate moiety established the second coordination
bond to calcium (d = 2.4 Å) and a hydrogen bond
to the backbone amide group of G31, as shown in Figure , while the additional phenyl ring made significant
van der Waals contacts with the side chains of L2, G29, and V30. The
4-benzylbenzamide component of 4 displayed a similar
interaction pattern as in 1, except for the benzamide
ring, which was rotated by ca. 50 degrees. This rotation is induced
by the introduction of the substituent at the 2-position, and in the
case of sPLA2-X, this comes with a penalty. This is exemplified
by 2 and 3, where the affinity gain is very
limited, despite the addition of more lipophilic interactions (Table ). In type IIa, however,
this conformational lock is further stabilized by an edge-to-face
π interaction with F5, which is not available in sPLA2-X. This
is reflected by the steep improvement in affinity when adding the
substituents. For example, 3 despite having a linker
too short to form the additional calcium interaction still gains more
than 300-fold in affinity. This is further improved by the propanoic
acid side chain of 4 where the second calcium coordination
bond is properly established leading to a 2000-fold increase in potency
compared to 1. The active site of sPLA2-IIa is smaller,
F5 (L5 in sPLA2-X) affects the benzamide moiety, and I9
(V9 in sPLA2-X) is located close to the hinge between the
two benzyl groups of 1 (d = 3.7 Å),
thereby slightly altering the angle in which the 4-benzyl enters the
pocket and potentially introducing some strain in the fragment, where
the larger pocket of sPLA2-X offers a less restrained binding
modeThe high ligand efficiency and potency of 4, coupled with its marked plasma sPLA2 inhibition ability
(ICu,50 = 7 nM) triggered a broad characterization campaign
to identify potential shortcomings.As summarized in Table , compound 4 proved to be soluble, highly permeable, and metabolically stable;
characteristics that translated well in vivo with
high bioavailability and low systemic clearance recorded in rat and
dog (Table ). This
provided a significant improvement over varespladib, which required
a methyl ester prodrug approach (i.e., varespladib methyl) to afford
moderate oral absorption (F = 40–55%) in the
same species. Compound 4 did not show any significant
inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes or ion channel activity relevant
to cardiac function. Nevertheless, 4 inhibited the uptake
of pivastatin in HEK293 cells transfected with the human organic anionic
transporter polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) at an estimated IC50 of 2.2 μM, as shown in Table . The OATP1B1 transporter is necessary for statin’s
hypocholesterolemic action as it mediates their access to the liver
compartment where they can then inhibit the function of HMG-CoA reductase.[23−25]
Please
see the Supporting Information for experimental
details.
Please
see the Supporting Information for experimental
details.Considering that
an eventual sPLA2 inhibitor for the treatment of coronary
artery disease will need to be coadministered with a statin, as an
established standard of care, minimizing the risk for such drug–drug
interaction was required. As OATP1B1 recognizes anionic compounds,
we reasoned that modification of the molecular environment around
the carboxylic acid of 4 might alleviate its interaction
with OATP1B1. More specifically, substituting the carbon atom alpha
to the carboxylic acid was of special interest as (a) it was postulated
to provide a steric impediment to OTAP1B1, (b) it seemed compatible
with the binding pocket of the sPLA2-IIa enzyme, and (c)
it could enhance potency and/or selectivity through conformational
“freezing” of the carboxylic acid side chain via gauche-like
effects. Due to structure-based constraints and in order to minimize
the impact on compound lipophilicity, we targeted small substituents
and synthesized compounds 7–9, following Scheme .According
to Scheme , the appropriate
dimethyl malonate was alkylated using 3-bromobenzyl bromide. The propionic
acid derivative was then obtained by hydrolysis, decarboxylation,
and re-esterification to yield the methyl ester. Boronylation was
accomplished by standard protocols using (Bpin)2 and PdCl2(dppf) to yield the pinacol borane ester, which could be used
in the subsequent Suzuki–Miyaura coupling using the benzylated
chloro benzonitrile. Finally, racemic 7–9 could be obtained by hydrolysis using hydroxide in alcohol/water
mixtures (careful monitoring of the reaction to avoid overhydrolysis
to the corresponding diacid is needed).Addition of a methyl
group (7, Table ) displayed an isoform-specific effect on potency: while it
was neutral at sPLA2-IIa, it enhanced inhibition of sPLA2-V and reduced that of sPLA2-X. Overall, this yielded
excellent plasma sPLA2 inhibition (ICu,50: 0.1
nM). Remarkably, structural manipulation of the carboxylic acid surroundings
by an alpha-methyl group demonstrated the intended effect at a transporter
level, and 7 was devoid of OATP1B1 inhibition at the
maximum tested concentration (25 μM). Ethyl and cyclopropyl
substitutions (8, 9) were not as efficient
and had a deleterious effect on metabolic stability in human hepatocytes
(cf. 8, 9, and 7, Table ). We therefore proceeded
to separate and characterize the two enantiomers of 7. In line with expectations, sPLA2 inhibition was affected
by stereochemistry, and the R enantiomer proved to
be the most active, half-maximally inhibiting sPLA2-IIa,
-V, and -X at 10, 40, and 400 nM, respectively (Table ). As a result, (R)-7 was the most potent plasma sPLA2 inhibitor in
this study (ICu,50 = 0.1 nM) and, based on its minimized
risk for drug–drug interactions with statins, was progressed
to further profiling.
Table 4
sPLA2 Potency
and Optimization Parameters for Compounds 4–9
entry
R
sPLA2-IIa IC50 (μM)a
sPLA2-V IC50 (μM)a
sPLA2-X IC50 (μM)a
plasma ICu,50 (nM)b
HEP Clint (μL/min/10–6 cells)c
OATP1B1
IC50 (μM)d
4
H
0.012
0.36
0.28
7
5.2
2
7
Me
0.011
0.07
0.75
1
9.6
NAe
8
Et
0.021
0.07
0.43
0.8
25
NDf
9
CyPr
0.018
0.25
0.58
0.9
21
NDf
(S)-7
(S)-Me
0.038
1.2
3.8
ND
9.3
NDf
(R)-7
(R)-Me
0.010
0.04
0.4
0.1
12
NAe
Mean of at least
two experiments. Experimental errors within 20% of value.
Calculated as Plasma sPLA2 IC50 (μM) × unbound fraction in human plasma
(Fu)/100.
Intrinsic clearance of test compounds after incubation
with human hepatocytes.
Inhibition of pivastatin uptake to HEK293 cells transfected with
human OATP1B1.
Not active
at maximum tested concentration (25 μM).
Not determined.
Mean of at least
two experiments. Experimental errors within 20% of value.Calculated as Plasma sPLA2 IC50 (μM) × unbound fraction in human plasma
(Fu)/100.Intrinsic clearance of test compounds after incubation
with human hepatocytes.Inhibition of pivastatin uptake to HEK293 cells transfected with
humanOATP1B1.Not active
at maximum tested concentration (25 μM).Not determined.When incubated with HepG2 cells, (R)-7 effectively inhibited sPLA2 activity
(IC50 < 14 nM) and suppressed production of sPLA2-IIa (IC50 176 ± 28 nM) via a mechanism not
yet elucidated.[7] Importantly, (R)-7 demonstrated significant sPLA2 activity inhibition (IC50 56 ± 10 nM) in atherosclerotic
plaque homogenates, as obtained from carotid endarterectomy of coronary
artery disease patients (N = 7).[26]In vivo PK analysis of (R)-7 showed consistent high bioavailability
and low clearance across different animal species, as summarized in Table .
Table 5
PK Parameters of Compound (R)-7
mouse
rat
dog
cynomolgus
N i.v./p.o.
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
dose i.v./p.o. (μmol/kg)
10/50
2/8
1/3
5/15.8
oral AUC0-inf (μM × h)
69.7
70
284.1
71.3
Cl (mL/min/kg)
9.2
1
0.2
2.8
Vss (L/kg)
2.8
0.21
0.15
1.1
F (%)
76.3
84
91
81
Building
on the observed PK parameters and the in vitro sPLA2 inhibition measured in cynomolgus monkey plasma (ICu,50 1 nM), we resolved to evaluate the in vivo sPLA2 inhibitory effect of (R)-7.A 30 mg dose of (R)-7 was orally
administered to cynomolgus monkeys (N = 2), as shown
in Figure . This generated
a concentration-dependent inhibition of sPLA2 activity
in plasma (ICu,80 = 13 ± 3 nM) that well reflected
the time course of (R)-7’s exposure
profile (Figure ).
Figure 4
Vehicle-corrected
plasma sPLA2 activity inhibition: corresponding PK–PD
relationship (a) and time course (b) following oral administration
of 30 mg (R)-7 to cynomolgus monkeys
(N = 2).
Vehicle-corrected
plasma sPLA2 activity inhibition: corresponding PK–PD
relationship (a) and time course (b) following oral administration
of 30 mg (R)-7 to cynomolgus monkeys
(N = 2).In summary, starting from the original fragment hit 1, two design cycles based on structural information, ligand
efficiency reasoning, physicochemical property control, medicinal
chemistry tactics, and readily available experimental data resulted
in the discovery of (R)-7 (AZD2716),
a novel, potent sPLA2 inhibitor with excellent PK properties, in vivo efficacy, and minimized risk for drug–drug
interactions. Based on the available results and the favorable toxicological
profile in rats, dogs, and cynomolgus monkeys, (R)-7 was selected as a clinical candidate for the treatment
of coronary artery disease.
Authors: Stephen J Nicholls; John J P Kastelein; Gregory G Schwartz; Dianna Bash; Robert S Rosenson; Matthew A Cavender; Danielle M Brennan; Wolfgang Koenig; J Wouter Jukema; Vijay Nambi; R Scott Wright; Venu Menon; A Michael Lincoff; Steven E Nissen Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Fabrizio Giordanetto; Laurent Knerr; Peter Nordberg; Daniel Pettersen; Nidhal Selmi; Hans-Georg Beisel; Hannah de la Motte; Åsa Månsson; Mikael Dahlström; Johan Broddefalk; Gabrielle Saarinen; Fredrik Klingegård; Eva Hurt-Camejo; Birgitta Rosengren; Johannes Wikström; Maria Wågberg; Johan Brengdahl; Mattias Rohman; Jenny Sandmark; Tomas Åkerud; Robert G Roth; Frank Jansen; Marie Ahlqvist Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-06-23 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Akintunde O Akinkuolie; Patrick R Lawler; Audrey Y Chu; Michael Caulfield; Jianying Mu; Bo Ding; Fredrik Nyberg; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker; Eva Hurt-Camejo; Daniel I Chasman; Samia Mora Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Nahed N E El-Sayed; Norah M Almaneai; Abir Ben Bacha; Mohamed K El-Ashrey; Maha I Al-Zaben; Zainab M Almarhoon Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2022-05-23
Authors: Fatmah A S Alasmary; Fatima S Alnahdi; Abir Ben Bacha; Amr M El-Araby; Nadine Moubayed; Ahmed M Alafeefy; Moustafa E El-Araby Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 5.051
Authors: Anella Saviano; Simona De Vita; Maria Giovanna Chini; Noemi Marigliano; Gianluigi Lauro; Gian Marco Casillo; Federica Raucci; Maria Iorizzi; Robert Klaus Hofstetter; Katrin Fischer; Andreas Koeberle; Oliver Werz; Francesco Maione; Giuseppe Bifulco Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2022-01-07