OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder is characterized by reduced reward-related striatal activation and dysfunctional reward learning, putatively reflecting decreased dopaminergic signaling. The goal of this study was to test whether a pharmacological challenge designed to facilitate dopaminergic transmission can enhance striatal responses to reward and improve reward learning in depressed individuals. METHOD: In a double-blind placebo-controlled design, 46 unmedicated depressed participants and 43 healthy control participants were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or a single low dose (50 mg) of the D2/D3 receptor antagonist amisulpride, which is believed to increase dopamine signaling through presynaptic autoreceptor blockade. To investigate the effects of increased dopaminergic transmission on reward-related striatal function and behavior, a monetary incentive delay task (in conjunction with functional MRI) and a probabilistic reward learning task were administered at absorption peaks of amisulpride. RESULTS: Depressed participants selected previously rewarded stimuli less frequently than did control participants, indicating reduced reward learning, but this effect was not modulated by amisulpride. Relative to depressed participants receiving placebo (and control participants receiving amisulpride), depressed participants receiving amisulpride exhibited increased striatal activation and potentiated corticostriatal functional connectivity between the nucleus accumbens and the midcingulate cortex in response to monetary rewards. Stronger corticostriatal connectivity in response to rewards predicted better reward learning among depressed individuals receiving amisulpride as well as among control participants receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Acute enhancement of dopaminergic transmission potentiated reward-related striatal activation and corticostriatal functional connectivity in depressed individuals but had no behavioral effects. Taken together, the results suggest that targeted pharmacological treatments may normalize neural correlates of reward processing in depression; despite such acute effects on neural function, behavioral modification may require more chronic exposure. This is consistent with previous reports that antidepressant effects of amisulpride in depression emerged after sustained administration.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Major depressive disorder is characterized by reduced reward-related striatal activation and dysfunctional reward learning, putatively reflecting decreased dopaminergic signaling. The goal of this study was to test whether a pharmacological challenge designed to facilitate dopaminergic transmission can enhance striatal responses to reward and improve reward learning in depressed individuals. METHOD: In a double-blind placebo-controlled design, 46 unmedicated depressedparticipants and 43 healthy control participants were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or a single low dose (50 mg) of the D2/D3 receptor antagonist amisulpride, which is believed to increase dopamine signaling through presynaptic autoreceptor blockade. To investigate the effects of increased dopaminergic transmission on reward-related striatal function and behavior, a monetary incentive delay task (in conjunction with functional MRI) and a probabilistic reward learning task were administered at absorption peaks of amisulpride. RESULTS:Depressedparticipants selected previously rewarded stimuli less frequently than did control participants, indicating reduced reward learning, but this effect was not modulated by amisulpride. Relative to depressedparticipants receiving placebo (and control participants receiving amisulpride), depressedparticipants receiving amisulpride exhibited increased striatal activation and potentiated corticostriatal functional connectivity between the nucleus accumbens and the midcingulate cortex in response to monetary rewards. Stronger corticostriatal connectivity in response to rewards predicted better reward learning among depressed individuals receiving amisulpride as well as among control participants receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Acute enhancement of dopaminergic transmission potentiated reward-related striatal activation and corticostriatal functional connectivity in depressed individuals but had no behavioral effects. Taken together, the results suggest that targeted pharmacological treatments may normalize neural correlates of reward processing in depression; despite such acute effects on neural function, behavioral modification may require more chronic exposure. This is consistent with previous reports that antidepressant effects of amisulpride in depression emerged after sustained administration.
Authors: Roee Admon; Laura M Holsen; Harlyn Aizley; Anne Remington; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Jill M Goldstein; Diego A Pizzagalli Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Diego A Pizzagalli; Avram J Holmes; Daniel G Dillon; Elena L Goetz; Jeffrey L Birk; Ryan Bogdan; Darin D Dougherty; Dan V Iosifescu; Scott L Rauch; Maurizio Fava Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Katharine Dunlop; Sakina J Rizvi; Sidney H Kennedy; Stefanie Hassel; Stephen C Strother; Jacqueline K Harris; Mojdeh Zamyadi; Stephen R Arnott; Andrew D Davis; Farrokh Mansouri; Laura Schulze; Amanda K Ceniti; Raymond W Lam; Roumen Milev; Susan Rotzinger; Jane A Foster; Benicio N Frey; Sagar V Parikh; Claudio N Soares; Rudolf Uher; Gustavo Turecki; Glenda M MacQueen; Jonathan Downar Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Hanna Keren; Georgia O'Callaghan; Pablo Vidal-Ribas; George A Buzzell; Melissa A Brotman; Ellen Leibenluft; Pedro M Pan; Liana Meffert; Ariela Kaiser; Selina Wolke; Daniel S Pine; Argyris Stringaris Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Annabel E L Walsh; Michael Browning; Wayne C Drevets; Maura Furey; Catherine J Harmer Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Andrew M Novick; Mateus L Levandowski; Laura E Laumann; Noah S Philip; Lawrence H Price; Audrey R Tyrka Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Margarita V Alfimova; Nikolay V Kondratyev; Alexander S Tomyshev; Irina S Lebedeva; Tatyana V Lezheiko; Vasiliy G Kaleda; Lilia I Abramova; Vera E Golimbet Journal: J Mol Neurosci Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 3.444
Authors: Minhae Kim; Ishtiaq Mawla; Daniel S Albrecht; Roee Admon; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Courtney Bergan; Ekaterina Protsenko; Poornima Kumar; Robert R Edwards; Atreyi Saha; Vitaly Napadow; Diego A Pizzagalli; Marco L Loggia Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Franklin R Schneier; Mark Slifstein; Alexis E Whitton; Diego A Pizzagalli; Jenna Reinen; Patrick J McGrath; Dan V Iosifescu; Anissa Abi-Dargham Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 13.382