Roee Admon1, Laura M Holsen2, Harlyn Aizley3, Anne Remington4, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli5, Jill M Goldstein6, Diego A Pizzagalli7. 1. Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology, Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology, Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology, Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine. 5. Athinoula A. Martinos Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Charlestown, Massachusetts; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology, Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Athinoula A. Martinos Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Charlestown, Massachusetts. 7. Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts; McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Electronic address: dap@mclean.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increased sensitivity to stress and dysfunctional reward processing are two primary characteristics of major depressive disorder (MDD) that may persist after remission. Preclinical work has established the pivotal role of the striatum in mediating both stress and reward responses. Human neuroimaging studies have corroborated these preclinical findings and highlighted striatal dysfunction in MDD in response to reward but have yet to investigate striatal function during stress, in particular in individuals with recurrent depression. METHODS: A validated mild psychological stress task involving viewing of negative stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in 33 remitted individuals with a history of recurrent major depressive disorder (rMDD) and 35 matched healthy control subjects. Cortisol and anxiety levels were assessed throughout scanning. Stress-related activation was investigated in three striatal regions: caudate, nucleus accumbens, and putamen. Psychophysiologic interaction analyses probed connectivity of regions with central structures of the neural stress circuitry, such as the amygdala and hippocampus. RESULTS: The task increased cortisol and anxiety levels, although to a greater extent in rMDD individuals than healthy control subjects. In response to the negative stimuli, rMDD individuals, but not controls, also exhibited significantly potentiated caudate, nucleus accumbens, and putamen activations and increased caudate-amygdala and caudate-hippocampus connectivity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight striatal hypersensitivity in response to a mild psychological stress in rMDD, as manifested by hyperactivation and hyperconnectivity with the amygdala and hippocampus. Striatal hypersensitivity during stress might thus constitute a trait mark of depression, providing a potential neural substrate for the interaction between stress and reward dysfunction in MDD.
BACKGROUND: Increased sensitivity to stress and dysfunctional reward processing are two primary characteristics of major depressive disorder (MDD) that may persist after remission. Preclinical work has established the pivotal role of the striatum in mediating both stress and reward responses. Human neuroimaging studies have corroborated these preclinical findings and highlighted striatal dysfunction in MDD in response to reward but have yet to investigate striatal function during stress, in particular in individuals with recurrent depression. METHODS: A validated mild psychological stress task involving viewing of negative stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in 33 remitted individuals with a history of recurrent major depressive disorder (rMDD) and 35 matched healthy control subjects. Cortisol and anxiety levels were assessed throughout scanning. Stress-related activation was investigated in three striatal regions: caudate, nucleus accumbens, and putamen. Psychophysiologic interaction analyses probed connectivity of regions with central structures of the neural stress circuitry, such as the amygdala and hippocampus. RESULTS: The task increased cortisol and anxiety levels, although to a greater extent in rMDD individuals than healthy control subjects. In response to the negative stimuli, rMDD individuals, but not controls, also exhibited significantly potentiated caudate, nucleus accumbens, and putamen activations and increased caudate-amygdala and caudate-hippocampus connectivity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight striatal hypersensitivity in response to a mild psychological stress in rMDD, as manifested by hyperactivation and hyperconnectivity with the amygdala and hippocampus. Striatal hypersensitivity during stress might thus constitute a trait mark of depression, providing a potential neural substrate for the interaction between stress and reward dysfunction in MDD.
Authors: Romina Mizrahi; Jean Addington; Pablo M Rusjan; Ivonne Suridjan; Alvina Ng; Isabelle Boileau; Jens C Pruessner; Gary Remington; Sylvain Houle; Alan A Wilson Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Nynke A Groenewold; Esther M Opmeer; Peter de Jonge; André Aleman; Sergi G Costafreda Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Jill X O'Reilly; Mark W Woolrich; Timothy E J Behrens; Stephen M Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Anita Harrewijn; Pablo Vidal-Ribas; Katharina Clore-Gronenborn; Sarah M Jackson; Simone Pisano; Daniel S Pine; Argyris Stringaris Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Sophie R DelDonno; Lisanne M Jenkins; Natania A Crane; Robin Nusslock; Kelly A Ryan; Stewart A Shankman; K Luan Phan; Scott A Langenecker Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Amy T Peters; Lisanne M Jenkins; Jonathan P Stange; Katie L Bessette; Kristy A Skerrett; Leah R Kling; Robert C Welsh; Mohammed R Milad; Kinh L Phan; Scott A Langenecker Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Anastacia Y Kudinova; Terrence Deak; Cara M Hueston; John E McGeary; Valerie S Knopik; Rohan H C Palmer; Brandon E Gibb Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2016-04-07
Authors: Amy T Peters; Anna Van Meter; Patrick J Pruitt; Emily M Briceño; Kelly A Ryan; Melissa Hagan; Anne L Weldon; Michelle T Kassel; Aaron Vederman; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Melvin McInnis; Sara L Weisenbach; Scott A Langenecker Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Carmen Andreescu; Olusola Ajilore; Howard J Aizenstein; Kimberly Albert; Meryl A Butters; Bennett A Landman; Helmet T Karim; Robert Krafty; Warren D Taylor Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.105