Literature DB >> 27771862

A protocol for the refinement of NMR structures using simultaneously pseudocontact shift restraints from multiple lanthanide ions.

Davide Sala1, Andrea Giachetti1, Claudio Luchinat2,3, Antonio Rosato4,5.   

Abstract

The binding of paramagnetic metal ions to proteins produces a number of different effects on the NMR spectra of the system. In particular, when the magnetic susceptibility of the metal ion is anisotropic, pseudocontact shifts (PCSs) arise and can be easily measured. They constitute very useful restraints for the solution structure determination of metal-binding proteins. In this context, there has been great interest in the use of lanthanide(III) ions to induce PCSs in diamagnetic proteins, e.g. through the replacement native calcium(II) ions. By preparing multiple samples in each of which a different ion of the lanthanide series is introduced, it is possible to obtain multiple independent PCS datasets that can be used synergistically to generate protein structure ensembles (typically called bundles). For typical NMR-based determination of protein structure, it is necessary to perform an energetic refinement of such initial bundles to obtain final structures whose geometric quality is suitable for deposition in the PDB. This can be conveniently done by using restrained molecular dynamics simulations (rMD) in explicit solvent. However, there are no available protocols for rMD using multiple PCS datasets as part of the restraints. In this work, we extended the PCS module of the AMBER MD package to handle multiple datasets and tuned a previously developed protocol for NMR structure refinement to achieve consistent convergence with PCS restraints. Test calculations with real experimental data show that this new implementation delivers the expected improvement of protein geometry, resulting in final structures that are of suitable quality for deposition. Furthermore, we observe that also initial structures generated only with traditional restraints can be successfully refined using traditional and PCS restraints simultaneously.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lanthanide ion; Metalloprotein; Protein structure; Pseudocontact shift; Structure refinement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27771862     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-016-0065-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  64 in total

1.  Comparison of protein solution structures refined by molecular dynamics simulation in vacuum, with a generalized Born model, and with explicit water.

Authors:  Bin Xia; Vickie Tsui; David A Case; H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA.

Authors:  Torsten Herrmann; Peter Güntert; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Implicit solvation based on generalized Born theory in different dielectric environments.

Authors:  Michael Feig; Wonpil Im; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Using Pseudocontact Shifts and Residual Dipolar Couplings as Exact NMR Restraints for the Determination of Protein Structural Ensembles.

Authors:  Carlo Camilloni; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Quantitative study of the effects of chemical shift tolerances and rates of SA cooling on structure calculation from automatically assigned NOE data.

Authors:  Michele Fossi; Hartmut Oschkinat; Michael Nilges; Linda J Ball
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 6.  Paramagnetic tagging of diamagnetic proteins for solution NMR.

Authors:  Fernando Rodriguez-Castañeda; Peter Haberz; Andrei Leonov; Christian Griesinger
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Andrea Cavalli; Xavier Salvatella; Christopher M Dobson; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Comparisons of NMR spectral quality and success in crystallization demonstrate that NMR and X-ray crystallography are complementary methods for small protein structure determination.

Authors:  David A Snyder; Yang Chen; Natalia G Denissova; Thomas Acton; James M Aramini; Melissa Ciano; Richard Karlin; Jinfeng Liu; Philip Manor; P A Rajan; Paolo Rossi; G V T Swapna; Rong Xiao; Burkhard Rost; John Hunt; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Recommendations of the wwPDB NMR Validation Task Force.

Authors:  Gaetano T Montelione; Michael Nilges; Ad Bax; Peter Güntert; Torsten Herrmann; Jane S Richardson; Charles D Schwieters; Wim F Vranken; Geerten W Vuister; David S Wishart; Helen M Berman; Gerard J Kleywegt; John L Markley
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Structural studies of proteins by paramagnetic solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Christopher P Jaroniec
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Probing conformational dynamics in biomolecules via chemical exchange saturation transfer: a primer.

Authors:  Pramodh Vallurupalli; Ashok Sekhar; Tairan Yuwen; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Long-range paramagnetic NMR data can provide a closer look on metal coordination in metalloproteins.

Authors:  Linda Cerofolini; Tommaso Staderini; Stefano Giuntini; Enrico Ravera; Marco Fragai; Giacomo Parigi; Roberta Pierattelli; Claudio Luchinat
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.358

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.