| Literature DB >> 27770215 |
George J Greene1,2, Greg Swann1,2, Angela J Fought3, Alex Carballo-Diéguez4, Thomas J Hope5, Patrick F Kiser6, Brian Mustanski1,2, Richard T D'Aquila7.
Abstract
HIV prevention method preferences were evaluated among 512 U.S. men who have sex with men (MSM; median age: 22 years). Approximately 90 % consistently preferred one option across pairwise comparisons of condoms, daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and long-acting PrEP delivered via either an injectable or one of two types of PrEP implants differing in visibility. Condoms were most frequently preferred (33.8 %), followed by non-visible implants (21.5 %), and oral PrEP (17.0 %); HIV risk was reported by more choosing implants. In a follow-up question comparing the four PrEP options only, daily oral pills and non-visible implants were most frequently preferred (35.5 and 34.3 %, respectively), followed by injections (25.2 %) and visible implants (4.3 %). An inductive, open-coding approach determined that convenience, duration of protection, and privacy were the most commonly cited reasons for a PrEP method choice, and associated with self-report of HIV risk. Tailoring PrEP product development to privacy and other concerns important to those at highest HIV risk may improve HIV prevention.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; Homosexuality; Male; Pre-exposure prophylaxis; Prevention; Sexual behavior
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27770215 PMCID: PMC5380480 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1565-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Behav ISSN: 1090-7165