Literature DB >> 27770072

Formal faculty observation and assessment of bedside skills for 3rd-year neurology clerks.

Robert Thompson Stone1, Christopher Mooney2, Erika Wexler2, Jonathan Mink2, Jennifer Post2, Ralph F Jozefowicz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of instituting a formalized bedside skills evaluation (BSE) for 3rd-year medical students on the neurology clerkship.
METHODS: A neurologic BSE was developed for 3rd-year neurology clerks at the University of Rochester for the 2012-2014 academic years. Faculty directly observed 189 students completing a full history and neurologic examination on real inpatients. Mock grades were calculated utilizing the BSE in the final grade, and number of students with a grade difference was determined when compared to true grade. Correlation was explored between the BSE and clinical scores, National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) scores, case complexity, and true final grades. A survey was administered to students to assess their clinical skills exposure and the usefulness of the BSE.
RESULTS: Faculty completed and submitted a BSE form for 88.3% of students. There was a mock final grade change for 13.2% of students. Correlation coefficients between BSE score and clinical score/NBME score were 0.36 and 0.35, respectively. A statistically significant effect of BSE was found on final clerkship grade (F2,186 = 31.9, p < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between BSE score and differing case complexities.
CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating a formal faculty-observed BSE into the 3rd year neurology clerkship was feasible. Low correlation between BSE score and other evaluations indicated a unique measurement to contribute to student grade. Using real patients with differing case complexity did not alter the grade.
© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27770072      PMCID: PMC5123551          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  8 in total

1.  Faculty and the observation of trainees' clinical skills: problems and opportunities.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Validity and the OSCE.

Authors:  Brian Hodges
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Direct observation of students during clerkship rotations: a multiyear descriptive study.

Authors:  Lisa D Howley; William G Wilson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 4.  Assessment in medical education.

Authors:  Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Evaluation of the assessment and grading of medical students on a neurology clerkship.

Authors:  Jeremy D Schmahmann; Marygrace Neal; Jason MacMore
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  [OSCE in the neurology clerkship. Experiences at the neurological department of the university hospital Erlangen].

Authors:  J G Heckmann; F Knossalla; S Gollwitzer; C Lang; S Schwab
Journal:  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 0.752

7.  Editorial: Are Medical Schools neglecting clinical skills?

Authors:  G L Engel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-08-16       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Student assessment by objective structured examination in a neurology clerkship.

Authors:  Rimas V Lukas; Taiwo Adesoye; Sandy Smith; Angela Blood; James R Brorson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 9.910

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.