Literature DB >> 27765677

Blood collection tubes as medical devices: The potential to affect assays and proposed verification and validation processes for the clinical laboratory.

Raffick A R Bowen1, Dorothy M Adcock2.   

Abstract

Blood collection tubes (BCTs) are an often under-recognized variable in the preanalytical phase of clinical laboratory testing. Unfortunately, even the best-designed and manufactured BCTs may not work well in all clinical settings. Clinical laboratories, in collaboration with healthcare providers, should carefully evaluate BCTs prior to putting them into clinical use to determine their limitations and ensure that patients are not placed at risk because of inaccuracies due to poor tube performance. Selection of the best BCTs can be achieved through comparing advertising materials, reviewing the literature, observing the device at a scientific meeting, receiving a demonstration, evaluating the device under simulated conditions, or testing the device with patient samples. Although many publications have discussed method validations, few detail how to perform experiments for tube verification and validation. This article highlights the most common and impactful variables related to BCTs and discusses the validation studies that a typical clinical laboratory should perform when selecting BCTs. We also present a brief review of how in vitro diagnostic devices, particularly BCTs, are regulated in the United States, the European Union, and Canada. The verification and validation of BCTs will help to avoid the economic and human costs associated with incorrect test results, including poor patient care, unnecessary testing, and delays in test results. We urge laboratorians, tube manufacturers, diagnostic companies, and other researchers to take all the necessary steps to protect against the adverse effects of BCT components and their additives on clinical assays. Copyright Â
© 2016 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood; Collection; Preanalytical; Tube; Validation; Verification

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27765677     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the effect of gel used in two different serum separator tubes for thyroid function tests.

Authors:  Müjgan Ercan; Esra Fırat Oğuz; Emiş Deniz Akbulut; Mustafa Yilmaz; Turan Turhan
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Guidance on the critical shortage of sodium citrate coagulation tubes for hemostasis testing.

Authors:  Robert C Gosselin; Annette Bowyer; Emmanuel J Favaloro; Jill M Johnsen; Giuseppe Lippi; Richard A Marlar; Keith Neeves; Marian A Rollins-Raval
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 16.036

Review 3.  The value of cell-free DNA for molecular pathology.

Authors:  Caitlin M Stewart; Prachi D Kothari; Florent Mouliere; Richard Mair; Saira Somnay; Ryma Benayed; Ahmet Zehir; Britta Weigelt; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Maria E Arcila; Michael F Berger; Dana Wy Tsui
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 4.  Review of the Use of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Laboratories: Part II-Operations.

Authors:  Brian A Rappold
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.941

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.