| Literature DB >> 27764786 |
Lujun Chen1,2,3, Quanqin Xie1,2,3, Zhigang Wang1,2,4, Liangrong Shi1,2,5,3, Changping Wu1,2,5,3, Jingting Jiang1,2,3.
Abstract
The co-stimulatory ligands of B7-family have been confirmed to play an important role in negatively regulating the T-cell mediated anti-tumor immunity. In addition, these inhibitory molecules are also aberrantly expressed on various human cancers tissues, and significantly associated with cancer progression and patients' poor prognoses. We have previously reported that B7-H3 and B7-H4 ligands are highly expressed in human esophageal cancer tissues. Herein, we tried to further analyze the value of their combined expression on prognostic prediction for esophageal cancer patients. We found that the combined expression of both B7-H3 and B7-H4 could be used as a valuable risk factor for predicting the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients (P=0.003). Moreover the status of these patients with high expression of both B7-H3 and B7-H4, was positively and significantly associated with the tumor invasion depth (P=0.0414) and TNM stage (P=0.0414). The Cox multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that the tumor size (P=0.007), the TNM stage (P=0.024) and the status of both B7-H3 and B7-H4 high expression (P=0.011), could be used as an independent risk factor for predicting patients' postoperative prognosis, respectively. In conclusion, our data indicated that the combined application of B7-H3 and B7-H4 expression can be effectively used as a prognostic marker in esophageal cancer patients.Entities:
Keywords: B7-H3; B7-H4; immunohistochemistry; prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27764786 PMCID: PMC5363583 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1B7-H3 and B7-H4 immunostaining in human esophageal cancer tissues
The panel A. represented the high expression of both B7-H3 and B7-H4 proteins, while panel B. showed, B7-H3 high and B7-H4 low expression, and panel C. revealed B7-H3 low and B7-H4 high expression. The panel D. represented the low expression of both B7-H3 and B7-H4 proteins. The panel E. represented the weak expression of B7-H3 as well as B7-H4 in adjacent normal esophageal tissues. (Scale bar = 100 μm).
Correlation between the clinical parameters and B7-H3 expression in combination with B7-H4 expression in esophageal cancer tissues
| Clinical parameters | Cases | Combination of B7-H3 and B7-H4 expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Both high (%) | Other patients (%) | ||||
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 75 | 32 (42.67) | 43 (57.33) | 5.176 | |
| Female | 28 | 19 (67.86) | 9 (32.14) | ||
| Age (years) | |||||
| < 60 | 63 | 34 (53.97) | 29 (46.03) | 1.287 | 0.2566 |
| ≥ 60 | 40 | 17 (42.50) | 23 (57.50) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | |||||
| < 3.5 | 38 | 18 (47.37) | 20 (52.63) | 0.1109 | 0.7391 |
| ≥ 3.5 | 65 | 33 (50.77) | 32 (49.23) | ||
| Depth of invasion (T) | |||||
| T1 | 13 | 3 (23.08) | 10 (76.92) | 4.160 | |
| T2+3+4 | 90 | 48 (53.33) | 42 (46.67) | ||
| Nodal metastasis (N) | |||||
| Yes | 49 | 29 (59.18) | 20 (40.82) | 3.496 | 0.0615 |
| No | 54 | 22 (40.74) | 32 (59.26) | ||
| Distant metastasis (M) | |||||
| Yes | 16 | 11 (68.75) | 5 (31.25) | 2.804 | 0.0940 |
| No | 87 | 40 (45.98) | 47 (54.02) | ||
| TNM stage | |||||
| I | 13 | 3 (23.08) | 10 (76.92) | 4.160 | |
| II+III+IV | 90 | 48 (53.33) | 42 (46.67) | ||
Values in bold signify P < 0.05
Figure 2Correlation analysis between different expression of B7-H3 and B7-H4 proteins and overall survival in esophageal cancer patients
Panel A. showed that comparison of the overall survival rate of the patients with B7-H3 high and B7-H4 low vs. patients with both B7-H3 and B7-H4 high expression. Panel B. showed the comparison of the overall survival rate of the patients with both B7-H3 and B7-H4 high expression vs. all the other patients.
Prognostic factors analysis based on Cox's proportional hazards model
| Clinical parameters | Uni-variate | Multi-variate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio | 95% CI | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | |||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male / Female | 0.780 | 0.473-1.286 | 0.329 | 0.898 | 0.553-1.515 | 0.688 |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| ≥ 60 / < 60 | 1.100 | 0.688-1.759 | 0.690 | 1.038 | 0.638-1.689 | 0.880 |
| Tumor size (cm) | ||||||
| ≥ 3.5 / < 3.5 | 2.213 | 1.319-3.711 | 2.101 | 1.228-3.596 | ||
| TNM Stage | ||||||
| SIII+IV / SI+II | 1.886 | 1.168-3.044 | 1.758 | 1.079-2.864 | ||
| B7-H3 and -H4 combined | ||||||
| Both high / others | 2.066 | 1.272-3.355 | 1.876 | 1.155-3.046 | ||
Values in bold signify P < 0.05.