Literature DB >> 27759599

Aortic and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement During Hepatic-Arterial and Portal Venous Phase Computed Tomography Scanning: Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis Using Age, Sex, Total Body Weight, Height, and Cardiac Output.

Takanori Masuda1, Takeshi Nakaura, Yoshinori Funama, Toru Higaki, Masao Kiguchi, Naoyuki Imada, Tomoyasu Sato, Kazuo Awai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of the age, sex, total body weight (TBW), height (HT) and cardiac output (CO) of patients on aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement during hepatic-arterial phase (HAP) and portal venous phase (PVP) computed tomography (CT) scanning.
METHODS: This prospective study received institutional review board approval; prior informed consent to participate was obtained from all 168 patients. All were examined using our routine protocol; the contrast material was 600 mg/kg iodine. Cardiac output was measured with a portable electrical velocimeter within 5 minutes of starting the CT scan. We calculated contrast enhancement (per gram of iodine: [INCREMENT]HU/gI) of the abdominal aorta during the HAP and of the liver parenchyma during the PVP. We performed univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis between all patient characteristics and the [INCREMENT]HU/gI of aortic- and liver parenchymal enhancement.
RESULTS: Univariate linear regression analysis demonstrated statistically significant correlations between the [INCREMENT]HU/gI and the age, sex, TBW, HT, and CO (all P < 0.001). However, multivariate linear regression analysis showed that only the TBW and CO were of independent predictive value (P < 0.001). Also, only the CO was independently and negatively related to aortic enhancement during HAP and to liver parenchymal enhancement when the contrast material injection protocol was adjusted for the TBW (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: By multivariate linear regression analysis only the TBW and CO were significantly correlated with aortic and liver parenchymal enhancement; the age, sex, and HT were not. The CO was the only independent factor affecting aortic and liver parenchymal enhancement at hepatic CT when the protocol was adjusted for the TBW.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27759599     DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  4 in total

1.  Minimizing individual variations in arterial enhancement on coronary CT angiographs using "contrast enhancement optimizer": a prospective randomized single-center study.

Authors:  Yoriaki Matsumoto; Toru Higaki; Takanori Masuda; Tomoyasu Sato; Yuko Nakamura; Fuminari Tatsugami; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Prospective multicenter study on personalized and optimized MDCT contrast protocols: results on liver enhancement.

Authors:  F Zanca; H G Brat; P Pujadas; D Racine; B Dufour; D Fournier; B Rizk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Contrast enhancement on 100- and 120 kVp hepatic CT scans at thin adults in a retrospective cohort study: Bayesian inference of the optimal enhancement probability.

Authors:  Takanori Masuda; Takeshi Nakaura; Yoshinori Funama; Tomoyasu Sato; Toru Higaki; Yoriaki Matsumoto; Yukari Yamashita; Naoyuki Imada; Masao Kiguchi; Yasutaka Baba; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Effect of Patient Factors on Portal Vein and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement at Computed Tomography Scan With Protocol Combining Fixed Injection Duration and Patients' Body Weight Tailored Dose of Contrast Material.

Authors:  Hui Ye
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.