| Literature DB >> 27757584 |
Youri van Berkel1, Michael Ludwig2, Joanna A E van Wijk1, Arend Bökenkamp3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dent disease is a rare X-linked recessive proximal tubulopathy caused by mutations in CLCN5 (Dent-1) or OCRL (Dent-2). As a rule, total protein excretion (TPE) is low in tubular proteinuria compared with glomerular disease. Several authors have reported nephrotic-range proteinuria (NP) and glomerulosclerosis in Dent disease. Therefore, we aimed to analyze protein excretion in patients with documented CLCN5 or OCRL mutations in a systematic literature review.Entities:
Keywords: CLCN5; Dent disease; Low-molecular weight proteinuria; Nephrotic syndrome; OCRL; Proteinuria; Systematic review
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27757584 PMCID: PMC5579149 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3499-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Nephrol ISSN: 0931-041X Impact factor: 3.714
Fig. 1Study flow
Proteinuria in Dent-1 and Dent-2 patients
| Total | Dent-1 | Dent-2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dipstick ( |
|
|
| 0.02 |
| 1+ | 18 (27.3 %) | 17 (30.9 %) | 1 (9.1 %) | |
| 2+ | 40 (60.6 %) | 34 (61.8 %) | 6 (54.5 %) | |
| 3+ | 7 (10.6 %) | 3 (5.5 %) | 4 (36.4 %) | |
| 4+ | 1 (1.5 %) | 1 (1.8 %) | 0 (0 %) | |
| P/C (mg/g) |
|
|
|
|
| 2800 (2100–4104) | 2850 (1835–4900) | 2718 (NA) | ||
| TPE (mg/m2/h) |
|
|
| 0.11 |
| 49.0 (38.1–69.1) | 47.0 (37.3–67.4) | 57.5 (41.8–81.1) | ||
| NP ( | 68/148 (45.9 %) | 55/126 (43.7 %) | 13/22 (59.1 %) | 0.25 |
Data presented as number (%) of cases or as median and interquartile range (IQR)
P/C protein–creatinine ratio, TPE timed protein excretion, NP nephrotic-range proteinuria
Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor use
| Author | Patient ID | Mutation | Age (years) | ACE inhibitor | ARB | T = 0 | T = 1 | Treatment duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copelovitch et al. [ | Patient 1 |
| 12 | Yes | No | Proteinuria: 50 mg/kg/day | Proteinuria: 25 mg/kg day | 2 months |
| Frishberg et al. [ | Patient 1 |
| 9 | Yes | Yes | NA | No effect on proteinuria |
|
| Patient 3 |
| 14 | Yes | Yes |
| No effect on proteinuria |
| |
| Lim et al. [ | Case 1 |
| 3 | Yes | No |
| 50 % P/C reduction | 6 months |
| Marsenic et al. [ | Patient 1 |
| 13 | Yes | No |
| Strong rise in serum creatinine |
|
| Okamoto et al. [ | Case 1 |
| 3 | Yes | No | GFR 73 ml/min/1.73 m2 | GFR 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 | 7 years |
| Vaisbich et al. [ | Case 1 |
| 11 | Yes | No | Proteinuria: 51 mg/kg day | Proteinuria: 65 mg/kg day | 3 years 5 months |
| Case 2 |
| 4 | Yes | No | Proteinuria: 65 mg/kg day | Proteinuria: 60 mg/kg day | 4 years |
ARB angiotensin II receptor-blockers, ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, GFR glomerular filtration rate, T = 0 before therapy, T = 1 during therapy
Kidney biopsy results
| Author | Patient ID | Mutation | Age (years) | Sticks (0–4+) | P/C (mg/g creat) | TPE (mg/m2/h) | GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | Glomeruli in biopsy ( | Sclerosis global [ | Sclerosis focal [ | Tubulointerstitial fibrosis | Calcinosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anglani et al. [ | Case 2 |
| 15 |
|
| 23.4 | 140 |
| 0 | 0 | + |
|
| Becker-Cohen et al. [ | Patient 3 |
| 10 |
| 2898 |
| 83 |
| FGS n.o.s. | 0 |
|
|
| Cheong et al. [ | Patient 2 |
| 9 |
|
| 45.5 | 127 |
| 0 | 0 | − | + |
| Copelovitch et al. [ | Patient 1 |
| 12 |
| 1602 | 46.1 | 76 | 37 | 9 (25) | 0 | + |
|
| Patient 2 |
| 9 |
|
| 55.2 | 79 | 6 | 2 (33) | 2 (33) | + |
| |
| Fervenza et al. [ | Case 1 |
| 18 |
|
| 108.4 | 44 | 21 | 4 (19) | 0 | + |
|
| Frishberg et al. [ | Patient 1 |
| 9 |
|
| 42.4 | 131 | 50 | 2 (4) | 0 | − |
|
| Patient 3 |
| 14 |
|
| 32.3 | 122 | 50 | 5 (10) | 1 (2) | − |
| |
| Patient 4 |
| 9 | 4+ | 2151 | 49.1 | 127 | 24 | 2 (8) | 2 (8) | + |
| |
| Hellemans et al. [ | Patient 1 |
| 20 |
|
| 73.3 | 61 |
| 0 | 0 | − |
|
| Hoopes et al. [ | A-4-1 |
| 4 |
|
| 34.0 |
|
| FGS n.o.s. | 0 | + | + |
| Igarashi et al. [ | Family 1.3 |
| 6 | 2+ |
|
| 132 |
| FGS n.o.s. | 0 |
| + |
| Family 3.8 |
| 15 | 2+ |
|
| 175 |
| FGS n.o.s. | 0 | ++ | + | |
| Family 3.9 |
| 13 | 2+ |
|
| 113 |
| FGS n.o.s. | 0 | ++ | + | |
| Family 5.13 |
| 16 | 1+ |
|
| 151 |
| FGS n.o.s. | 0 | ++ |
| |
| Kaneko K et al. [ | Case |
| 4 |
|
| 81.8 | 194 |
| 0 | FSGS n.o.s. | − |
|
| Langlois et al. [ | Case 1 |
| 7 |
|
| 24.4 | 150 |
| FGS n.o.s. | 0 | ++ | + |
| Case 3 |
| 2 |
|
| 39.3 | 84 | 42 | 0 | 2 (5) | ++ |
| |
| Li et al. [ | Patient 1 |
| 11 |
|
| 24.3 | 92 |
| 0 | 0 | − |
|
| Lim et al. [ | Case 1 |
| 3 |
|
| 181.5 | 135 | 19 | 0 | 0 | − |
|
| Matsuyama et al. [ | 3.II.1 |
| 8 | 2+ |
|
| 182 | 53 | 7 (13) | 0 | − | − |
| 1.II.1 |
| 12 | 2+ |
|
| 171 | 45 | Immature | Immature |
| + | |
| Morimoto et al. [ | 2-2-c |
| 21 | 2+ |
|
| 100 |
| 0 | 0 | − | − |
| Okamoto et al. [ | Case 1 |
| 3 | 2+ |
| 59.0 | 97 |
| FGS n.o.s. | 0 | ++ |
|
| Ramos-Trujillo et al. [ | P274 |
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | 0 | − | − |
| Sekine et al. [ | Patient 2 |
| 16 | 3+ |
|
| 102 |
| 0 | 0 | − |
|
| Sheffer-Babila et al. [ | Patient A |
| 8 |
|
| 87.0 | 68 | 18 | 3 (17) | 0 |
|
|
| Patient B |
| 11 |
|
| 49.0 | 101 |
| FGS n.o.s. | 0 |
|
| |
| Takemura et al. [ | Patient 1 |
| 2 | 2+ |
| 69.1 |
|
| 0 | 0 | − |
|
| Patient 2 |
| 3 | 2+ |
| 39.2 |
|
| NA |
| − | + | |
| Tasic et al. [ | Patient 3 |
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| − | − |
| Vaisbich et al. [ | Case 1 |
| 11 |
|
| 61.8 | 75 | 84 | 23 (27) |
| + |
|
| Case 2 |
| 4 |
|
| 65.2 | 193 |
|
|
| − | + | |
| Yanagida et al. [ | Case 1 |
| 2 | 2+ |
| 69.1 |
|
| 0 | 0 | + |
|
| Median (IQR) | 9 (4–13) | 2+ | 2435 | 49.1 (35–69) | 117 (83–148) | 40 (20–50) | 17 % | 6 % |
P/C protein–creatinine ratio, TPE timed protein excretion, GFR glomerular filtration rate, FGS focal global sclerosis, FSGS focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, n.o.s. not otherwise specified, NA not available, − absent, + mild, ++ severe