Purpose: There is inconclusive evidence to suggest the expression of programmed cell death (PD) ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a putative predictor of response to PD-1/PD-L1-targeted therapies in lung cancer. We evaluated the heterogeneity in the expression of PD-1 ligands in isogeneic primary and metastatic LC specimens. Experimental Design: From 12,580 post mortem cases, we identified 214 patients with untreated metastatic LC, of which 98 had adequately preserved tissues to construct a syngeneic primary LC/metastasis tissue microarray. Immunostaining for PD-L1 and 2 was evaluated in paired primary and metastatic lesions and correlated with clinicopathologic features. Results: We included 98 patients with non-small cell (NSCLC, n = 65, 66%), small cell histology (SCLC, n = 29, 30%) and four (4%) atypical carcinoids (AC). In total 8/65 (12%) primary PD-L1 positive NSCLC, had discordant matched metastases (14/17, 82%). PD-L1 negative primaries had universally concordant distant metastases. SCLCs were universally PD-L1 negative across primary and metastatic disease. PD-L2 positive NSCLC (n = 11/65, 17%) had high rate of discordant metastases (n = 24/27, 88%) and four cases (6%) had PD-L2 positive metastases with negative primaries. 2/29 SCLC (7%) and 1/4 AC (25%) were PD-L2 positive with discordance in all the sampled metastatic sites (n = 5). We found no correlation between the expression of PD ligands and clinicopathologic features of LC. Conclusions: Intra-tumoral heterogeneity in the expression of PD ligands is common in NSCLC, while PD-L1 is homogeneously undetectable in primary and metastatic SCLC. This holds implications in the clinical development of immune response biomarkers in LC.
Purpose: There is inconclusive evidence to suggest the expression of programmed cell death (PD) ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a putative predictor of response to PD-1/PD-L1-targeted therapies in lung cancer. We evaluated the heterogeneity in the expression of PD-1 ligands in isogeneic primary and metastatic LC specimens. Experimental Design: From 12,580 post mortem cases, we identified 214 patients with untreated metastatic LC, of which 98 had adequately preserved tissues to construct a syngeneic primary LC/metastasis tissue microarray. Immunostaining for PD-L1 and 2 was evaluated in paired primary and metastatic lesions and correlated with clinicopathologic features. Results: We included 98 patients with non-small cell (NSCLC, n = 65, 66%), small cell histology (SCLC, n = 29, 30%) and four (4%) atypical carcinoids (AC). In total 8/65 (12%) primary PD-L1 positive NSCLC, had discordant matched metastases (14/17, 82%). PD-L1 negative primaries had universally concordant distant metastases. SCLCs were universally PD-L1 negative across primary and metastatic disease. PD-L2 positive NSCLC (n = 11/65, 17%) had high rate of discordant metastases (n = 24/27, 88%) and four cases (6%) had PD-L2 positive metastases with negative primaries. 2/29 SCLC (7%) and 1/4 AC (25%) were PD-L2 positive with discordance in all the sampled metastatic sites (n = 5). We found no correlation between the expression of PD ligands and clinicopathologic features of LC. Conclusions: Intra-tumoral heterogeneity in the expression of PD ligands is common in NSCLC, while PD-L1 is homogeneously undetectable in primary and metastatic SCLC. This holds implications in the clinical development of immune response biomarkers in LC.
Entities:
Keywords:
Heterogeneity; PD-1; PD-L1; PD-L2; lung cancer
Authors: Yanyan Lou; Lixia Diao; Edwin Roger Parra Cuentas; Warren L Denning; Limo Chen; You Hong Fan; Lauren A Byers; Jing Wang; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; Carmen Behrens; Jaime Canales Rodriguez; Patrick Hwu; Ignacio I Wistuba; John V Heymach; Don L Gibbons Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Scott N Gettinger; Leora Horn; Leena Gandhi; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Naiyer A Rizvi; John D Powderly; Rebecca S Heist; Richard D Carvajal; David M Jackman; Lecia V Sequist; David C Smith; Philip Leming; David P Carbone; Mary C Pinder-Schenck; Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Jeffrey A Sosman; Mario Sznol; David F McDermott; Drew M Pardoll; Vindira Sankar; Christoph M Ahlers; Mark Salvati; Jon M Wigginton; Matthew D Hellmann; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok K Gupta; Julie R Brahmer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Julie R Brahmer; Charles G Drake; Ira Wollner; John D Powderly; Joel Picus; William H Sharfman; Elizabeth Stankevich; Alice Pons; Theresa M Salay; Tracee L McMiller; Marta M Gilson; Changyu Wang; Mark Selby; Janis M Taube; Robert Anders; Lieping Chen; Alan J Korman; Drew M Pardoll; Israel Lowy; Suzanne L Topalian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ash A Alizadeh; Victoria Aranda; Alberto Bardelli; Cedric Blanpain; Christoph Bock; Christine Borowski; Carlos Caldas; Andrea Califano; Michael Doherty; Markus Elsner; Manel Esteller; Rebecca Fitzgerald; Jan O Korbel; Peter Lichter; Christopher E Mason; Nicholas Navin; Dana Pe'er; Kornelia Polyak; Charles W M Roberts; Lillian Siu; Alexandra Snyder; Hannah Stower; Charles Swanton; Roel G W Verhaak; Jean C Zenklusen; Johannes Zuber; Jessica Zucman-Rossi Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Nicholas McGranahan; Andrew J S Furness; Rachel Rosenthal; Sofie Ramskov; Rikke Lyngaa; Sunil Kumar Saini; Mariam Jamal-Hanjani; Gareth A Wilson; Nicolai J Birkbak; Crispin T Hiley; Thomas B K Watkins; Seema Shafi; Nirupa Murugaesu; Richard Mitter; Ayse U Akarca; Joseph Linares; Teresa Marafioti; Jake Y Henry; Eliezer M Van Allen; Diana Miao; Bastian Schilling; Dirk Schadendorf; Levi A Garraway; Vladimir Makarov; Naiyer A Rizvi; Alexandra Snyder; Matthew D Hellmann; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Sachet A Shukla; Catherine J Wu; Karl S Peggs; Timothy A Chan; Sine R Hadrup; Sergio A Quezada; Charles Swanton Journal: Science Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Simone B S P Terra; Aaron S Mansfield; Haidong Dong; Tobias Peikert; Anja C Roden Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Salvinia Mletzko; David J Pinato; Rebecca C Robey; Alessia Dalla Pria; Peter Benson; Nesrina Imami; Mark Bower Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Shelby M Knoche; Alaina C Larson; Bailee H Sliker; Brittany J Poelaert; Joyce C Solheim Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 9.237
Authors: A Po; M Silvano; E Miele; C Capalbo; A Eramo; V Salvati; M Todaro; Z M Besharat; G Catanzaro; D Cucchi; S Coni; L Di Marcotullio; G Canettieri; A Vacca; G Stassi; E De Smaele; M Tartaglia; I Screpanti; R De Maria; E Ferretti Journal: Oncogene Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Xinfeng Chen; Liping Wang; Jinyan Liu; Lan Huang; Li Yang; Qun Gao; Xiaojuan Shi; Jieyao Li; Feng Li; Zhen Zhang; Song Zhao; Bin Zhang; Pierre Van der Bruggen; Yi Zhang Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Jinkai Teo; Anja Mirenska; Meihui Tan; Yifang Lee; Janice Oh; Lewis Z Hong; Richard Wnek; Yoon-Sim Yap; Shian-Jiun Shih; Ali Asgar S Bhagat; Chih-Liang Chin; David Ag Skibinski Journal: Future Sci OA Date: 2017-09-04