Literature DB >> 27757287

ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENTS AND OBJECTIVE FORCES OF GLENOHUMERAL TRANSLATIONS DURING SHOULDER ACCESSORY PASSIVE MOTION TESTING IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS.

Nancy Henderson1, Haley Worst1, Ryan Decarreau1, George Davies1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical examination of caspuloligamentous structures of the glenohumeral joint has historically been subjective in nature, as demonstrated by limited intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility. Musculoskeletal diagnostic ultrasound was utilized to develop a clinically objective measurement technique for glenohumeral inferior and posterolateral translation.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the accessory passive force required to achieve end range glenohumeral posterolateral and inferior accessory translation, as well as, to quantify the amount of translation of the glenohumeral joint caused by the applied force. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive correlational study.
METHODS: Twenty-five asymptomatic subjects between the ages of 18 and 30 were recruited via convenience sampling. Posterolateral and inferior shoulder accessory passive translation was assessed and measured using a GE LOGIQe ultrasound, while concurrently using a hand held dynamometer to quantify the passive force applied during assessment. Normative values for force and translation were described as means and standard deviations.
RESULTS: Mean values for posterolateral translation were 6.5 +/- 4.0 mm on the right shoulder and 6.3 +/- 3.5 mm on the left with an associated mean force of 127.1 +/- 55.6 N and 114.4 +/- 50.7 N, respectively. Mean values for inferior translation were 4.8 +/- 1.7 mm on the right shoulder and 5.4 +/- 1.8 mm on the left with an associated mean force of 84.5 +/- 30.5 N and 76.1 +/- 30.1 N, respectively. There was a significant association between inferior translation and inferior force (r = .51). No significant association was found between posterolateral translation and posterolateral force. Significant differences were found between dominant and non-dominant shoulders for posterolateral translation, posterolateral force to produce translation, and inferior translation values.
CONCLUSIONS: Force data in the posterolateral and inferior direction is consistent with previously reported data for passive accessory motion testing at the shoulder. The results of this study provide data for glenohumeral translations and actual forces applied. Musculoskeletal diagnostic ultrasound can be a clinically relevant way to objectively measure the translation of the glenohumeral joint for assessing accessory passive motion joint translation while performing mobilizations or passive structure testing. This study provides a basis for comparison for healthy shoulder joints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.

Keywords:  Diagnostic ultrasound; glenohumeral joint translation; handheld dynamometry

Year:  2016        PMID: 27757287      PMCID: PMC5046968     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  23 in total

1.  Ultrasonic measurement of the anterior translation in the shoulder joint.

Authors:  A L Krarup; M Court-Payen; B Skjoldbye; G S Lausten
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Characterization of tissue resistance during a dorsally directed translational mobilization of the glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  Ar-Tyan Hsu; Larry Ho; Jia-Hao Chang; Guan-Liang Chang; Tom Hedman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Cadaveric study of glenohumeral translation using electromagnetic sensors.

Authors:  Mark T Reis; James E Tibone; Patrick J McMahon; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Correlation of range of motion and glenohumeral translation in professional baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Paul A Borsa; Kevin E Wilk; Jon A Jacobson; Jason S Scibek; Geoffrey C Dover; Michael M Reinold; James R Andrews
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Sonographic stress measurement of glenohumeral joint laxity in collegiate swimmers and age-matched controls.

Authors:  Paul A Borsa; Jason S Scibek; Jon A Jacobson; Keith Meister
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The application of isokinetics in testing and rehabilitation of the shoulder complex.

Authors:  T S Ellenbecker; G J Davies
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Biomechanical analysis of axial distraction mobilization of the glenohumeral joint--a cadaver study.

Authors:  Ar-Tyan Hsu; Jing-Fang Chiu; Jia Hao Chang
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2008-09-19

Review 8.  Inter-clinician and intra-clinician reliability of force application during joint mobilization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kara S Gorgos; Nicole T Wasylyk; Bonnie L Van Lunen; Matthew C Hoch
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2013-12-24

9.  Patterns of stiffness during clinical examination of the glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  K J McQuade; I Shelley; J Cvitkovic
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  In vivo comparison of changes in glenohumeral translation after arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstructions.

Authors:  David P Magit; James E Tibone; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.