BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral laxity that is greater than normal has been implicated as a causal factor in the development of shoulder pain and dysfunction in elite swimmers; however, quantitative evidence demonstrating greater-than-normal glenohumeral joint laxity in swimmers is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To quantify glenohumeral joint laxity in elite swimmers and nonswimming controls using stress sonography. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Force-displacement measures were performed bilaterally in 42 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I swimmers and 44 age-matched controls. Of the 42 swimmers, 27 (64%) reported a history of unilateral or bilateral shoulder pain resulting from swimming. Ultrasound imaging was used to measure glenohumeral joint displacement under stressed and non-stressed conditions. RESULTS: An analysis of variance revealed no significant difference in glenohumeral joint displacement between swimmers (anterior, 2.82 +/- 1.7 mm; posterior, 5.30 +/- 2.4 mm) and age-matched controls (anterior, 2.74 +/- 1.7 mm; posterior, 4.90 +/- 2.7 mm). No significant difference in glenohumeral joint displacement was found between swimmers with a history of shoulder pain (anterior, 2.90 +/- 1.6 mm; posterior, 5.42 +/- 2.3 mm) versus swimmers without a history of shoulder pain (anterior, 2.74 +/- 1.8 mm; posterior, 5.14 +/- 2.6 mm). Shoulders displayed significantly more glenohumeral joint displacement in the posterior direction compared to the anterior direction (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our instrumented technique was unable to identify significantly greater glenohumeral joint displacement in elite swimmers compared to nonswimming controls, and elite swimmers with a history of shoulder pain were not found to have significantly more glenohumeral joint displacement compared to swimmers without a history of shoulder pain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Objective assessment of glenohumeral joint displacement in athletes participating in overhead-motion sports may be important for injury prevention and management.
BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral laxity that is greater than normal has been implicated as a causal factor in the development of shoulder pain and dysfunction in elite swimmers; however, quantitative evidence demonstrating greater-than-normal glenohumeral joint laxity in swimmers is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To quantify glenohumeral joint laxity in elite swimmers and nonswimming controls using stress sonography. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Force-displacement measures were performed bilaterally in 42 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I swimmers and 44 age-matched controls. Of the 42 swimmers, 27 (64%) reported a history of unilateral or bilateral shoulder pain resulting from swimming. Ultrasound imaging was used to measure glenohumeral joint displacement under stressed and non-stressed conditions. RESULTS: An analysis of variance revealed no significant difference in glenohumeral joint displacement between swimmers (anterior, 2.82 +/- 1.7 mm; posterior, 5.30 +/- 2.4 mm) and age-matched controls (anterior, 2.74 +/- 1.7 mm; posterior, 4.90 +/- 2.7 mm). No significant difference in glenohumeral joint displacement was found between swimmers with a history of shoulder pain (anterior, 2.90 +/- 1.6 mm; posterior, 5.42 +/- 2.3 mm) versus swimmers without a history of shoulder pain (anterior, 2.74 +/- 1.8 mm; posterior, 5.14 +/- 2.6 mm). Shoulders displayed significantly more glenohumeral joint displacement in the posterior direction compared to the anterior direction (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our instrumented technique was unable to identify significantly greater glenohumeral joint displacement in elite swimmers compared to nonswimming controls, and elite swimmers with a history of shoulder pain were not found to have significantly more glenohumeral joint displacement compared to swimmers without a history of shoulder pain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Objective assessment of glenohumeral joint displacement in athletes participating in overhead-motion sports may be important for injury prevention and management.
Authors: Pierre A d'Hemecourt; Dai Sugimoto; Maxwell McKee-Proctor; Rebecca L Zwicker; Sarah S Jackson; Eduardo N Novais; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Andrea Stracciolini Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.176