Literature DB >> 17786758

Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility.

K Brownell1, J Lockyer, T Collin, J-F Lemay.   

Abstract

The MMI was introduced into the medical admissions process at the University of Calgary (UofC) in 2006. This report outlines the steps which were involved in its development and our evaluation of the process. The MMI allowed us to interview applicants in one weekend, with fewer interviewers and less time required per interviewer compared to our previous interview process. Most importantly, more than 90% of both the applicants and interviewers found the process to be very acceptable. This process allowed us to ensure that the interview process focused on the non-cognitive traits we are looking for in the students we admit to the UofC.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17786758     DOI: 10.1080/01421590701311713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  18 in total

1.  Development and pilot testing of a multiple mini-interview for admission to a pharmacy degree program.

Authors:  Andrea J Cameron; Linda D Mackeigan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Perceptions and Cost-Analysis of a Multiple Mini-Interview in a Pharmacy School Admissions Process.

Authors:  Robin L Corelli; Michael A Muchnik; Ryan J Beechinor; Gary Fong; Eleanor M Vogt; Jennifer M Cocohoba; Candy Tsourounis; Karen Suchanek Hudmon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  The Multiple Mini-Interview as an Admission Tool for a PharmD Program Satellite Campus.

Authors:  David Singer; Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Wendy C Cox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Musculoskeletal education: a curriculum evaluation at one university.

Authors:  Marcia L Clark; Carol R Hutchison; Jocelyn M Lockyer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  "What do they want me to say?" The hidden curriculum at work in the medical school selection process: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jonathan White; Keith Brownell; Jean-Francois Lemay; Jocelyn M Lockyer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yoshimura; Hidetaka Kitazono; Shigeki Fujitani; Junji Machi; Takuya Saiki; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Gominda Ponnamperuma
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  The validity of a behavioural multiple-mini-interview within an assessment centre for selection into specialty training.

Authors:  Chris Roberts; Tyler Clark; Annette Burgess; Michael Frommer; Marcia Grant; Karyn Mossman
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?

Authors:  Allan Pau; Yu Sui Chen; Verna Kar Mun Lee; Chew Fei Sow; Ranjit De Alwis
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-02-11

9.  Quantitative analysis of a Māori and Pacific admission process on first-year health study.

Authors:  Elana Curtis; Erena Wikaire; Yannan Jiang; Louise McMillan; Robert Loto; Papaarangi Reid
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Cutting costs of multiple mini-interviews - changes in reliability and efficiency of the Hamburg medical school admission test between two applications.

Authors:  Johanna C Hissbach; Susanne Sehner; Sigrid Harendza; Wolfgang Hampe
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.