Robert E Burke1, Jeffrey L Schnipper, Mark V Williams, Edmondo J Robinson, Eduard E Vasilevskis, Sunil Kripalani, Joshua P Metlay, Grant S Fletcher, Andrew D Auerbach, Jacques D Donzé. 1. *Hospital Medicine and Research Sections, Eastern Colorado Health Care System, DE †Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO ‡BWH Hospitalist Service, Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital §Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA ∥Center for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY ¶Value Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, DE #Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University **VA Tennessee Valley, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) ††Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN ‡‡Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA §§Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA ∥∥Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA ¶¶Division of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: New tools to accurately identify potentially preventable 30-day readmissions are needed. The HOSPITAL score has been internationally validated for medical inpatients, but its performance in select conditions targeted by the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) is unknown. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Six geographically diverse medical centers. PARTICIPANTS/EXPOSURES: All consecutive adult medical patients discharged alive in 2011 with 1 of the 4 medical conditions targeted by the HRRP (acute myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, and heart failure) were included. Potentially preventable 30-day readmissions were identified using the SQLape algorithm. The HOSPITAL score was calculated for all patients. MEASUREMENTS: A multivariable logistic regression model accounting for hospital effects was used to evaluate the accuracy (Brier score), discrimination (c-statistic), and calibration (Pearson goodness-of-fit) of the HOSPITAL score for each 4 medical conditions. RESULTS: Among the 9181 patients included, the overall 30-day potentially preventable readmission rate was 13.6%. Across all 4 diagnoses, the HOSPITAL score had very good accuracy (Brier score of 0.11), good discrimination (c-statistic of 0.68), and excellent calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P=0.77). Within each diagnosis, performance was similar. In sensitivity analyses, performance was similar for all readmissions (not just potentially preventable) and when restricted to patients age 65 and above. CONCLUSIONS: The HOSPITAL score identifies a high-risk cohort for potentially preventable readmissions in a variety of practice settings, including conditions targeted by the HRRP. It may be a valuable tool when included in interventions to reduce readmissions within or across these conditions.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: New tools to accurately identify potentially preventable 30-day readmissions are needed. The HOSPITAL score has been internationally validated for medical inpatients, but its performance in select conditions targeted by the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) is unknown. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Six geographically diverse medical centers. PARTICIPANTS/EXPOSURES: All consecutive adult medical patients discharged alive in 2011 with 1 of the 4 medical conditions targeted by the HRRP (acute myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, and heart failure) were included. Potentially preventable 30-day readmissions were identified using the SQLape algorithm. The HOSPITAL score was calculated for all patients. MEASUREMENTS: A multivariable logistic regression model accounting for hospital effects was used to evaluate the accuracy (Brier score), discrimination (c-statistic), and calibration (Pearson goodness-of-fit) of the HOSPITAL score for each 4 medical conditions. RESULTS: Among the 9181 patients included, the overall 30-day potentially preventable readmission rate was 13.6%. Across all 4 diagnoses, the HOSPITAL score had very good accuracy (Brier score of 0.11), good discrimination (c-statistic of 0.68), and excellent calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P=0.77). Within each diagnosis, performance was similar. In sensitivity analyses, performance was similar for all readmissions (not just potentially preventable) and when restricted to patients age 65 and above. CONCLUSIONS: The HOSPITAL score identifies a high-risk cohort for potentially preventable readmissions in a variety of practice settings, including conditions targeted by the HRRP. It may be a valuable tool when included in interventions to reduce readmissions within or across these conditions.
Authors: Amy J H Kind; Steve Jencks; Jane Brock; Menggang Yu; Christie Bartels; William Ehlenbach; Caprice Greenberg; Maureen Smith Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jacques D Donzé; Mark V Williams; Edmondo J Robinson; Eyal Zimlichman; Drahomir Aujesky; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Sunil Kripalani; Joshua P Metlay; Tamara Wallington; Grant S Fletcher; Andrew D Auerbach; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Joseph G Ouslander; Ilkin Naharci; Gabriella Engstrom; Jill Shutes; David G Wolf; Graig Alpert; Carolina Rojido; Ruth Tappen; David Newman Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Ruben Amarasingham; Parag C Patel; Kathleen Toto; Lauren L Nelson; Timothy S Swanson; Billy J Moore; Bin Xie; Song Zhang; Kristin S Alvarez; Ying Ma; Mark H Drazner; Usha Kollipara; Ethan A Halm Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Norbert I Goldfield; Elizabeth C McCullough; John S Hughes; Ana M Tang; Beth Eastman; Lisa K Rawlins; Richard F Averill Journal: Health Care Financ Rev Date: 2008
Authors: Lauren N Smith; Anil N Makam; Douglas Darden; Helen Mayo; Sandeep R Das; Ethan A Halm; Oanh Kieu Nguyen Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-01
Authors: John A Dodson; Alexandra M Hajduk; Terrence E Murphy; Mary Geda; Harlan M Krumholz; Sui Tsang; Michael G Nanna; Mary E Tinetti; David Goldstein; Daniel E Forman; Karen P Alexander; Thomas M Gill; Sarwat I Chaudhry Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2019-05
Authors: John A Dodson; Alexandra M Hajduk; Terrence E Murphy; Mary Geda; Harlan M Krumholz; Sui Tsang; Michael G Nanna; Mary E Tinetti; Gregory Ouellet; Deborah Sybrant; Thomas M Gill; Sarwat I Chaudhry Journal: Open Heart Date: 2021-01
Authors: Michael E Matheny; Iben Ricket; Christine A Goodrich; Rashmee U Shah; Meagan E Stabler; Amy M Perkins; Chad Dorn; Jason Denton; Bruce E Bray; Ram Gouripeddi; John Higgins; Wendy W Chapman; Todd A MacKenzie; Jeremiah R Brown Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-01-04
Authors: Andrea Lázaro Cebas; José Manuel Caro Teller; Carmen García Muñoz; Carlos González Gómez; José Miguel Ferrari Piquero; Carlos Lumbreras Bermejo; José Antonio Romero Garrido; Juana Benedí González Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: C Beau Hilton; Alex Milinovich; Christina Felix; Nirav Vakharia; Timothy Crone; Chris Donovan; Andrew Proctor; Aziz Nazha Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2020-04-03