Literature DB >> 27754596

Educational utility of advanced three-dimensional virtual imaging in evaluating the anatomical configuration of the frontal recess.

Abib Agbetoba1, Amber Luong2, Jin Keat Siow3, Brent Senior4, Claudio Callejas5, Kornel Szczygielski6, Martin J Citardi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sinus surgery represents a cornerstone in the professional development of otorhinolaryngology trainees. Mastery of these surgical skills requires an understanding of paranasal sinus and skull-base anatomy. The frontal sinus is associated with a wide range of variation and complex anatomical configuration, and thus represents an important challenge for all trainees performing endoscopic sinus surgery.
METHODS: Forty-five otorhinolaryngology trainees and 20 medical school students from 5 academic institutions were enrolled and randomized into 1 of 2 groups. Each subject underwent learning of frontal recess anatomy with both traditional 2-dimensional (2D) learning methods using a standard Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) viewing software (RadiAnt Dicom Viewer Version 1.9.16) and 3-dimensional (3D) learning utilizing a novel preoperative virtual planning software (Scopis Building Blocks), with one half learning with the 2D method first and the other half learning with the 3D method first. Four questionnaires that included a total of 20 items were scored for subjects' self-assessment on knowledge of frontal recess and frontal sinus drainage pathway anatomy following each learned modality. A 2-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used in the statistical analysis comparing the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Most trainees (89%) believed that the virtual 3D planning software significantly improved their understanding of the spatial orientation of the frontal sinus drainage pathway.
CONCLUSION: Incorporation of virtual 3D planning surgical software may help augment trainees' understanding and spatial orientation of the frontal recess and sinus anatomy. The potential increase in trainee proficiency and comprehension theoretically may translate to improved surgical skill and patient outcomes and in reduced surgical time.
© 2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; endoscopic sinus surgery; residency training in rhinology; simulation training; sinus anatomyzzm321990

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27754596      PMCID: PMC5299043          DOI: 10.1002/alr.21864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  10 in total

1.  3D computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess anatomy in patients without frontal sinusitis.

Authors:  Walter T Lee; Frederick A Kuhn; Martin J Citardi
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 2.  Prevention and management of complications in frontal sinus surgery.

Authors:  Amin R Javer; Talal Alandejani
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 3.  Surgery of the frontal recess and frontal sinus.

Authors:  Peter-John Wormald
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 4.  Virtual reality simulation training in Otolaryngology.

Authors:  Asit Arora; Loretta Y M Lau; Zaid Awad; Ara Darzi; Arvind Singh; Neil Tolley
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  Three-dimensional sinus imaging as an adjunct to two-dimensional imaging to accelerate education and improve spatial orientation.

Authors:  William C Yao; Rachel M Regone; Nancy Huyhn; E Brian Butler; Masayoshi Takashima
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Comparison between three-dimensional and triplanar computed tomography imaging of the frontal recess.

Authors:  Seth J Isaacs; Parul Goyal
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.467

Review 7.  Simulation in ENT medical education.

Authors:  K-E A Abou-Elhamd; A I Al-Sultan; U M Rashad
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  Surgical causes of failure in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  H H Ramadan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  Endoscopic sinus surgery. A review.

Authors:  D W Kennedy; B A Senior
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 10.  The use of image-guided surgery in endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence-based review with recommendations.

Authors:  Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Richard R Orlandi; Martin J Citardi; Timothy L Smith; Marvin P Fried; Todd T Kingdom
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.858

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Does the sternum play a role in the aetiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Preliminary data of a new theory.

Authors:  E Kenanidis; D I Athanasiadis; G Geropoulos; P Kakoulidis; M Potoupnis; E Tsiridis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Usefulness of virtual three-dimensional image analysis in inguinal hernia as an educational tool.

Authors:  Yuma Wada; Masaaki Nishi; Kozo Yoshikawa; Jun Higashijima; Tomohiko Miyatani; Takuya Tokunaga; Chie Takasu; Hideya Kashihara; Daichi Ishikawa; Toshiaki Yoshimoto; Mitsuo Shimada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Does three-dimensional anatomy improve student understanding?

Authors:  Charlotte P R Triepels; Carlijn F A Smeets; Kim J B Notten; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Jurgen J Futterer; Tineke F M Vergeldt; Sander M J Van Kuijk
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 4.  Augmented Realities, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning: Clinical Implications and How Technology Is Shaping the Future of Medicine.

Authors:  Gaby N Moawad; Jad Elkhalil; Jordan S Klebanoff; Sara Rahman; Nassir Habib; Ibrahim Alkatout
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.