Literature DB >> 27752864

Adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines in elderly patients with hospital acquired venous thromboembolism: a case control study.

Jason Suh1, Amishi Desai1, Anish Desai2, Josephine Dela Cruz1, Anusiyanthan Mariampillai1, Alexander Hindenburg3,4.   

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains the number one preventable cause of hospital acquired mortality and morbidity. Each year, more than 12 million patients are at risk for VTE. The delivery of appropriate and timely VTE prophylaxis is still suboptimal in many healthcare institutions and can lead to increased readmissions, morbidity, as well as costs. To clarify this issue further, we performed a retrospective case control study at our institution to determine if poor adherence to the VTE prophylaxis guidelines could lead to an increase in VTE events. This was a retrospective case control study conducted at Winthrop-University Hospital from January 2007 to December 2011. Exclusion criteria were age < 18 and concurrent use of anticoagulant agents. Out of 322 cases of hospital acquired VTE or readmission with VTE within 30 days of discharge, 289 cases were selected for final analysis and paired with age and sex matched controls. Patients with a hospital acquired VTE or a readmission for VTE within 30 days of discharge had a significantly reduced rate of VTE prophylaxis when compared to the control group (54.0 vs. 79.2 %, p < 0.0001). The VTE risk assessment rate was also lower in the VTE group (77.2 vs. 85.5 %, p = 0.035). No difference was noted in the time to prophylaxis administration between the two groups (34.8 vs. 33.1 h, p = 0.34). Lastly, sequential compression device (SCD) documentation rate was not different: 68/116 (58.6 %) vs. 44/87 (50.6 %), p = 0.32, between the two arms. Low adherence to the American College of Chest Physician (ACCP) guidelines for VTE prophylaxis correlated with an increase in hospital acquired VTE. The decreased adherence may be linked to a lower VTE risk assessment rate, and other barriers including incorrect identification of contraindications to pharmacologic prophylaxis, and poor documentation of mechanical prophylaxis. There was no difference in SCD documentation rate and timeliness to administration of initial thromboprophylaxis between the two groups. Future studies are needed to reassess adherence and documentation rates after system-wide improvements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACCP guideline adherence; Thromboprophylaxis; VTE

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27752864     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-016-1432-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  20 in total

1.  Executive summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Elie A Akl; Mark Crowther; David D Gutterman; Holger J Schuünemann
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Low-molecular-weight heparin and mortality in acutely ill medical patients.

Authors:  Ajay K Kakkar; Claudio Cimminiello; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Rajiv Parakh; Chen Wang; Jean-François Bergmann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Multi-screen electronic alerts to augment venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Authors:  K Fiumara; C Piovella; S Hurwitz; G Piazza; C M Niles; J Fanikos; M Paterno; M Labreche; L-A Stevens; S Baroletti; S Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Victor F Tapson; Hervé Decousus; Mario Pini; Beng H Chong; James B Froehlich; Manuel Monreal; Alex C Spyropoulos; Geno J Merli; Rainer B Zotz; Jean-François Bergmann; Ricardo Pavanello; Alexander G G Turpie; Mashio Nakamura; Franco Piovella; Ajay K Kakkar; Frederick A Spencer; Gordon Fitzgerald; Frederick A Anderson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Nils Kucher; Sophia Koo; Rene Quiroz; Joshua M Cooper; Marilyn D Paterno; Boris Soukonnikov; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Computerized decision support for the cardiovascular clinician: applications for venous thromboembolism prevention and beyond.

Authors:  Gregory Piazza; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Authors:  William H Geerts; David Bergqvist; Graham F Pineo; John A Heit; Charles M Samama; Michael R Lassen; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Multicenter evaluation of the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients in Canada.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; Akbar Panju; William Geerts; Graham F Pineo; Louis Desjardins; Alexander G G Turpie; Stanislav Glezer; Lehana Thabane; Rolf J Sebaldt
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 9.  Risk factors for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Frederick A Anderson; Frederick A Spencer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Estimated annual numbers of US acute-care hospital patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Frederick A Anderson; Maxim Zayaruzny; John A Heit; Dogan Fidan; Alexander T Cohen
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 10.047

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prevalence of Risk Factors for Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism in Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Spine Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Erik Wang; Leah Steinmetz; Dennis Vasquez-Montes; Aaron Buckland; John Bendo; Anthony Frempong-Boadu; Thomas Errico
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-29

Review 2.  Evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patient groups: cancer and critically ill.

Authors:  Benjamin Brenner; Russell Hull; Roopen Arya; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; James Douketis; Ismail Elalamy; Davide Imberti; Zhenguo Zhai
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2019-04-15

3.  Acceptance of clinical decision support system to prevent venous thromboembolism among nurses: an extension of the UTAUT model.

Authors:  Huixian Zha; Kouying Liu; Ting Tang; Yue-Heng Yin; Bei Dou; Ling Jiang; Hongyun Yan; Xingyue Tian; Rong Wang; Weiping Xie
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 4.  Evaluation of unmet clinical needs in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in at-risk patient groups: pregnancy, elderly and obese patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Brenner; Roopen Arya; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; James Douketis; Russell Hull; Ismail Elalamy; Davide Imberti; Zhenguo Zhai
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2019-12-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.